similar to: Problem updating monorepo on Windows

The monorepo prototype at https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 is currently 9 hours behind. I forget who’s responsible for the script(s) updating the monorepo(s), and it would be great if we can inform them of the state of the monorepo. Cheers -- Dean

Hi, I got a forced update when pulling today. If I merge master to a local branch, I get a bunch of add/add conflicts. This same commit exists under several hashes: https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/commit/687841777ef505 https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/commit/74725885552 Did someone push -f to the monorepo after doing branch surgery? Maybe there was a

On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 at 11:42, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > A few months ago I switched from using SVN for the LLVM project to using the GIT mono-repo, but I am still not particularly good at using GIT. How can I use the GIT command-line interface to select to the exact same set of sources used for the v7.0.0 branch, Do you mean the commit

I dont see anything hfsplus in the modules area??? > uname -r > > 3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64 > > [root at nuc5i3 ~]# find /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/ |grep hfs > /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs > /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/squashfs.ko >

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 12:07 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I have done just now. 5 repos added including debuginfo-tests. > ATM, it includes 17 repos total. > > - Created the new repo; https://github.com/llvm- > project/llvm-project-20170507.git > Branches will come later. > - The previous repository has a merge commit that

Hi A friend has a disk with an hfs filesystem on it; we'd like to move it to a Debian (etch 2.6.18-6) box and share it via samba 3.0.24. I can mount the hfs disk and see the files on the linux box : good I can share a normal (xfs/etx3) fs via samba to the Mac : good Although I can share the hfs fs via samba, the extended attributes are not visible; so the existing files on the hfs

I followed the instructions (I thought) for hfsplus on C7. Installed elrepo Then installed hfsplus hfsplus-tools and kmod-hfsplus kmod-hfs rpm -qa | grep hfs clearly shows the items kmod-hfsplus-0.0-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64 hfsplus-tools-540.1.linux3-4.el7.x86_64 kmod-hfs-0.0-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64 When I do my mount command mount -t hfsplus -o loop Mac.dmg /mnt/mac mount: unknown filesystem type

Has anyone used the hfsutils package? I tried the following and get an error: hfs mount ../vlc-1.1.3-intel.dmg hfsutils version 3.2.6 - Copyright (C) 1996-1998 Robert Leslie This is free software but comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. Type `license' for details. expected integer but got "../vlc-1.1.3-intel.dmg" while executing "hfs mount $path $partno"

That doesn’t work too. :-( Last login: Mon Mar 19 19:18:16 on console iMac:~ andre$ mount /dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse) map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse) map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse) /dev/disk2 on /Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3 (hfs, local, nodev, nosuid, journaled, noowners) iMac:~ andre$

While trying to dodge issues with case-sensitivity, I stumbled on a somewhat effective solution: the old Mac OS Hierarchical File System (HFS). HFS is case insensitive and supports symlinks, making it very useful for Wine. The drawbacks are that it's slow compared to modern file systems, the max file size is 2GB and filenames are limited to 31 bytes. It will likely have problems running

Hi list-members can anybody tell me why > pairwise.t.test(val, fac) produces an empty p-table. As shown below: Pairwise comparisons using t tests with pooled SD data: val and fac AS AT Fhh Fm Fmk Fmu GBS Gf HFS Hn jAL Kol R_Fill AT - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fhh - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fm - - - - - - -

Possibly unrelated but since someone asked, I wonder why we don’t have monorepo for releases? For example a .tar.s containing all LLVM6.0 components placed at correct location Zhang > 在 2018年8月30日，18:16，Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> 写道： > > Thanks! >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:31 PM NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote:

Is this intended to be the monorepo that eventually becomes the official repo, because if so I strongly object to putting libunwind, libc++ and libc++abi in it. I have recently been working on bring-up for libc++ and libunwind on a new platform and the integration of libunwind with the LLVM build system is already annoying (you can’t build it unless you have a working C++ standard library

I am planing to add projects into https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project in near future, possibly this week. Before doing that, I would like to ask users of it. 1st option is my preference in each paragraph. Let me know if you have other suggestions. * What is added? I will add; libunwind, llgo, openmp and parallel-libs. May I also add debuginfo-tests? * Will inactive projects be

I ran into a problem that I couldn't resolve straight away, but would like to solve for sometime in the future. We have a Thecus storage server (similar to a Buffalo TeraByte, if that helps?) that has a Mac filesystem on it. The mother board was failing, but the drives are still OK. A new box has been added, so the urgency is sort of gone. I was going to try and back up the data to a new

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

On 13 March 2018 at 16:51, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > On 7 February 2018 at 01:20, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I've landed the patch in r324449. > > To confirm, this change *did not* make it into 6.0.0, correct? I'm > looking at adding the external thunk for FreeBSD now, and we have > 6.0.0 in

Thanks for writing this up. I think it's a really important point which deserves discussion. Ultimately, I think it is a question as to whether to prioritize the easy switchover for existing out of tree forks, or to prioritize having the best conversion we can make. I feel very strongly that the latter should be the priority for the official repository conversion, and that, therefore, we

I am running a CentOS 3 server with a kernel version -2.4.21-40. I typically use Webmin to accomplish mounting varied filesystems, but this one has me buffaloed. We have a Thecus N5400 that was mounted on a Mac and a ton of data was written to it. All of the data was placed in yearly folders with content-related folders below the yearly folders. When I mount this through Webmin as an smbfs

hi will the official rsync version in future maybe support HFS(+) filesystem, like rsyncx does right now? i ask because the rsyncx version dosen't run on my linuxbox and the feature is only supported if all systems use rsyncx. regards sam