similar to: LLVM Release Schedules: 5.0.2, 6.0.1

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "LLVM Release Schedules: 5.0.2, 6.0.1"

2018 Mar 14
0
[Release-testers] LLVM Release Schedules: 5.0.2, 6.0.1
Le 14/03/2018 à 00:29, Tom Stellard via Release-testers a écrit : > Hi, > > We don't normally do X.Y.2 releases, but there has been some interest in > getting a 5.0.2 release out with the Spectre mitigations included, so I > am proposing the following schedule for a 5.0.2 release: > > LLVM 5.0.2 > -rc1 Mon Mar 19 > -final Mon Mar 26 > > To keep things
2018 Mar 30
4
LLVM 5.0.2-rc2 has been tagged
Hi, I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can begin testing. -Tom
2018 Apr 20
0
[Release-testers] LLVM 5.0.2-rc2 has been tagged
On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can > begin testing. > So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers. I am guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't normally do X.Y.2 releases. If you would like to test this release
2018 Mar 28
2
5.0.2-rc1 tagged
Hi, I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin. -Tom
2018 Mar 28
0
[Release-testers] 5.0.2-rc1 tagged
On 28/03/2018 07:19, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've tagged 5.0.2-rc1, so testing can begin. LLVM_VERSION_PATCH is set to "1". Is that normal? (I was expecting "2"). http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_502/rc1/CMakeLists.txt?revision=328512&view=markup#29 Thanks Sylvestre
2018 Apr 26
0
6.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
Will the PR's marked as blockers of PR36649 be merged in or do we need to do something specific? On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tagged the 6.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may begin testing and > uploading > binaries. Also, any tester who has not tested 5.0.2-rc1 and would like to >
2018 Apr 26
7
6.0.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged the 6.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may begin testing and uploading binaries. Also, any tester who has not tested 5.0.2-rc1 and would like to do so please try to do this before Friday, because I would like to tag 5.0.2-final then. As a reminder to users and developers, May 18 is the deadline for submitting merge requests for 6.0.1, so there is still time to get bug fixes
2018 May 03
3
5.0.2-final has been tagged
Hi, 5.0.2-final has been tagged. Testers may begin uploading binaries. Thanks, Tom
2018 Jun 15
7
6.0.1-rc3 has been tagged
Hi, I've tagged 6.0.1-rc3, which should be the last rc release. If every thing goes well, 6.0.1-final will be next Thursday. Testers please test 6.0.1-rc3 and upload the results. -Tom
2018 May 04
0
[Release-testers] 5.0.2-final has been tagged
Uploaded SLES11 and ubuntu 14.04. I can work on ubuntu 16.04 next. Is there any demand for ubuntu 17.10 releases? 4a0cb3e0ee573fb94e6c4f6be6c06eb661960471 clang+llvm-5.0.2-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz 90430f7f0058100265352b1b2a2cd57e55558f92 clang+llvm-5.0.2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-testers at
2016 Jun 10
5
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi, I had a quick look at that link and it seems to be a linker internal error. Presumably we're triggering a bug in the system toolchain. FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently running the tests. Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link: cd
2017 Jun 14
5
LLVM 4.0.1 -rc3 has been tagged
Hi, I just tagged LLVM 4.0.1-rc3, and it's ready for testing. If all goes well, we will do the final release on Monday. -Tom
2015 Dec 10
9
[3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
Hi, I've tagged the final version of 3.7.1. There is no difference from 3.7.1-rc2, so testers just need to build the packages no testing is required. -Tom
2018 Jun 07
2
[Release-testers] 6.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
On 06/05/2018 10:47 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 4 Jun 2018, at 18:01, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and >> reporting results. > > Built for FreeBSD 10, tested and uploaded: > > SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz)
2016 Jun 12
2
[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
> Test suite is green but I'm seeing two libc++ test failures when running check-all. What tests are failing? On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nikola Smiljanic via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Test suite is green but I'm seeing > two libc++ test failures when running check-all. I'm pretty sure these were >
2016 Jun 08
9
3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged
Hi, I've tagged 3.8.1-rc1, testers can begin testing. -Tom
2019 Aug 02
3
LLVM 8.0.1 Release
LLVM 8.0.1 is now available! Download it now, or read the release notes. This release contains bug-fixes for the LLVM 8.0.0 release. This release is API and ABI compatible with 8.0.0. LLVM 8.0.1 would not be possible without the help of our volunteer release team! Thanks to all the release testers: Dimitry Andric, Hans Wennborg, Yvan Roux, Sylvestre Ledru, Michał Górny, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer,
2019 Aug 02
3
LLVM 8.0.1 Release
LLVM 8.0.1 is now available! Download it now, or read the release notes. This release contains bug-fixes for the LLVM 8.0.0 release. This release is API and ABI compatible with 8.0.0. LLVM 8.0.1 would not be possible without the help of our volunteer release team! Thanks to all the release testers: Dimitry Andric, Hans Wennborg, Yvan Roux, Sylvestre Ledru, Michał Górny, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer,
2014 Apr 11
16
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4.1 - Testing Phase
Hi, I have just tagged the first release candidate for the 3.4.1 release, so testers may begin testing. Please refer to http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html for information on how to validate a release. If you have any questions or need something clarified, just email the list. For the 3.4.1 release we want to compare test results against 3.4-final. I have added support to the
2015 May 20
9
[LLVMdev] 3.6.1 -final has been tagged
Hi, The only regression in 3.6.1 -rc1 was on MIPS and it has been confirmed fixed, so I have now tagged 3.6.1 -final. Testers can start building and uploading the final binaries. Thanks, Tom