similar to: [Phabricator] Top-posting reply over email is working again!

Hi, If you use an Apple email address, you may have noticed that you were now receiving emails from Phab again. The issue was before that Apple email addresses got blacklisted by Phab because our server bounced emails sent by Phab. The email admins have diagnosed the cause for the bounce. Apple servers reject emails that are originated from Apple email addresses that are not properly

Would it make sense to officially have phabricator ignore all replies to the email thread, and instead require that all comments are done through phabricator itself? -Krzysztof On 5/25/2016 10:20 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring > replies. This one seems to be a different issue. > > In the thread

It seems emails to me were not sent out due to them being held back by sendgrid spam protection. In case somebody else has this problem, this might be something to look into. Best, Tobias On Fri, Jul 14, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev wrote: > Phab was down during the night, should be back up now. When phab is down, > emails don't get sent out (all emails get sent out

Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring replies. This one seems to be a different issue. In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s does have a way to carry the location.". Except

On 19 May 2016 at 19:59, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually > they make it through, but sometimes not. Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do: https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358 https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181 cheers, --renato

Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually they make it through, but sometimes not. For example, a recent email from Rafael (which I got through the llvm-commits list) seems to be addressed to the proper thing @ reviews.llvm.org, yet seems to have never made it onto the website. Not having not seen that response (because I was looking on the website), I ended up

> Dropping replies from the web interface or the mail interface? > Also: does "dropping replies" mean that an email reply doesn't show up in the phab interface? > (that's currently "working as intended", until we find enough time to write a parser for inline > comment replies in mails) I mean that email replies don't always appear in the web interface.

GAH! Sigh.... :( That is indeed what it does. See stripQuotedText in src/applications/metamta/parser/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParser.php if anyone's interested in hacking on php code, it looks like it might be fairly straightforward to have it strip only the lines starting with ">" after the "On ... wrote:" line. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Tim Northover

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:10, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you point to examples of that - where Phab links have been used to express non-mechanically-dependent patches? Not at the top of my head, but since that's not what we're talking about, I'll go to the next point. > Approval order isn't commit order - I'm more than happy to approve a

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:32 AM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 02:26, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > It's worth mentioning that Phabricator can read strings of the format > 'Depends on D1234' from commit messages and create those relationships for > you. >

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 13:43, Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It's worth pointing out that GitHub is not able to do this properly, > either. The problem on GitHub's side is that while a pull request can > contain multiple commits, one cannot properly review those commits > individually, and it is not at all possible to approve individual

On 11/12/2013 17:01, Manuel Klimek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Sanders > <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com <mailto:Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > I'm not getting the error email you mention, but I have noticed it > silently dropping replies (including my own on occasion). I > haven't spotted anything the missing replies

> On 2014-Jun-27, at 11:48, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I know you worked hard to make sure that updating a revision doesn't send email unless there is text typed into one of the boxes Manuel, but I think we should by default put some text into a box (and send the

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:31 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Jun 23, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Philip Reames via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 6/22/20 2:34 AM, Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:45 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > I'll go ahead and file one though - more and more people are using phab > for llvm, so the problems with it are coming up more and more often. https://secure.phabricator.com/T8269

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:17 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> writes: > > >> I can see how having multiple patches up at once for review might speed > >> things up. But what if a very first patch in a series needs major > >> changes and that affects every single following patch? The

Bruce et al. I'm posting a new thread with the "Top Posting" subject so I won't draw complaints about "hijacking" the 4-port thread. Top Posting refers to the practice of sending a message with a reply at the top and including the entire thread below the reply. I prefer this. If I'm actively following a thread, the most-recent information appears at the top

Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> writes: > Hi Manuel, > > I like Phabricator for code review much much more than emails. Let me know how > I can help (I’m not afraid of PHP). Chandler updated the llvm phabricator doc to point at what we're deploying: http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#status That'll lead you here: https://github.com/r4nt/llvm-reviews

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:12 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > Mehdi, Fangrui: are you willing to take on maintenance? > Sure, let's work out a transition plan offline! > > Otherwise, Shoaib, the cost is currently: > ~$300-350 / mo for sendgrid (300-350k emails / month) > ~$2k / mo for cloud (we currently run on 1 machine O.O, plus storage & >

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>wrote: > I'm not getting the error email you mention, but I have noticed it > silently dropping replies (including my own on occasion). I haven't spotted > anything the missing replies have in common. > Dropping replies from the web interface or the mail interface? Also: does "dropping