similar to: compiling for the ipad

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:02 AM, jacob navia <jacob at jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote: > Le 18/09/2017 à 21:20, Bruce Hoult a écrit : > >> Weird. The xcode compiler has been llvm for a long time, and A64 has been >> supported since the iPhone 5s came out four years ago. >> >> Perhaps you're asking this because you have an existing project targeting >> A32

Hi Simon, CMake 3.14 add support for crosscompiling iOS, tvOS and watchOS https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.14/manual/cmake-toolchains.7.html#cross-compiling-for-ios-tvos-or-watchos Can you clarify what your patch does? //Marcus cmake-toolchains(7) — CMake 3.14.7 Documentation<https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.14/manual/cmake-toolchains.7.html#cross-compiling-for-ios-tvos-or-watchos> The

Hi Simon, Please create a pull request here: https://github.com/xnorpx/opus/pulls Also please add a buildconfig here that exercise the BUILD_FRAMEWORK option: https://github.com/xnorpx/opus/blob/master/.github/workflows/build.yml [https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/302709?s=400&v=4]<https://github.com/xnorpx/opus/blob/master/.github/workflows/build.yml>

I was working with the rmetrics portfolioBacktesting function and dug into the code to try to find why my formula with 113 items, i.e. A1 thru A113, was being truncated and I only get 85 items, not 113. Is it due to a string length limitation in R or is it a bug in the strsplit or gsub functions, or in my string? I'd very much appreciate any suggestions ============Input script:

Hi, A64 versus A32/T32 code generation is controlled by the -target option which I don’t believe is under discussion here. James On 18 May 2016, at 13:17, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org<mailto:bruce at hoult.org>> wrote: Note that armv8a modifies the A32 and T32 instruction sets, and is therefore an important -march option for 32 bit code. Therefore armv8a can not be used to imply

On 25 June 2014 12:58, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > This is one of the worst parts about the Clang CLI for cross compilation at > the moment. I'd really like, if we're changing the CLI, to allow users to > remove it. For example, if I specify -march=armv7-a, it *shouldn't* need me > to put "-target arm" before it to work! Good lord,

WARNING: This is not compatible with the previous lz4 patchset. If you''re using experimental compression that isn''t in mainline kernels, be prepared to backup and restore or decompress before upgrading, and have backups in case it eats data (which appears not to be a problem any more, but has been during development). These patches add lz4 and lz4hc compression

Hi, On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:25:46AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote: > On 14/07/2024 03:49, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > I have read > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01 > > > > but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to > > "simply do it", and get back a mapped address.

Hi, so here it is, LZ4 compression method inside btrfs. The patchset is based on top of current Chris'' for-linus + Andi''s snappy implementation + the fixes from Li Zefan. Passes xfstests and stresstests. I haven''t measured performance on wide range of hardware or workloads, rather wanted to publish the patches before I get distracted again. I''d like to ask

Hi everyone, I'm a member engineer of linaro's llvm team,coming from Spreadtrum.I am a new person on LLVM.Now I'm writing a Target Parser for AArch64,so options parsing of AArch64 about cpu & arch & fpu can be summary to one place. In the TargetParser,we assume "aarch64" and "arm64" are synonyms of armv8a(as they are only for armv8a,people usually do

Le 25/08/2015 20:39, Renato Golin a écrit : > I'm also interested in knowing what you did. I think most people here > would be glad to know your peril and how you solved it. Stack layout: C++ code calls | | JITted C code, compiled and linked on the fly tha calls | | C++ code that throws The throw must pass through the JITted code to arrive at the catch at the top.

Dear Sir/Madam Our company, 4Js software, has developed an SQL data base software that runs under different operating systems: Windows, Linux, Mac OS X. This software compiles each SQL statement into a C program that is compiled "on the fly" and executed by our JIT, Just In Time compiler. We wanted to port it to Apple's iOS, and spent a lot of time retargetting the JIT for

Linux 3.11 added respective support, so I think we should follow suit. 1: xen: add LZ4 decompression support 2: libxc: add LZ4 decompression support Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Hi Marcus, When building shared libraries for macOS / iOS /tvOS, by default `.dylib` shared libraries will be generated. With this patch `BUILD_FRAMEWORK` is exposed as an option allowing the user to specify that a `.framework` bundle should be built instead of a standalone `.dylib` file. Enabling the option sets the necessary target properties to instruct CMake to do this. The Ogg CMake build

Hi On Mon Jul 27 11:29:44 CDT 2015 I posted a question here about the way llvm implements exceptions in Apple's OS X. Since then I have received ZERO answers. I have solved the problem myself by "disassembling" the messy source code available. I thank everyone for proving me (yet another time) that THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU.

Hi Tim, 2014-06-25 15:26 GMT+08:00 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>: > Hi Kevin, > > I assume you've looked at the GCC documentation in this area, since > your ideas are very similar: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AArch64-Options.html. I actually > think that looks like a rational set of conventions too. > > The main difference appears to be

Hi all, I think it's Gentoo's bug, but I want to know if anyone has the same issue here. I am compiling LLVM trunk on Gentoo (gcc 4.5.2), and I get error message below, --- make[4]: Entering directory `/nfs_home/chenwj/llvm-3.1/svn/build/tools/clang/lib/Frontend' llvm[4]: Compiling InitHeaderSearch.cpp for Release+Asserts build

Hi, consider the following two dataframes: x1=c("232","3454","3455","342","13") x2=c("1","1","1","0","0") data1=data.frame(x1,x2) y1=c("232","232","3454","3454","3455","342","13","13","13","13")

Hello all, The rich history of binary distribution formats based on LLVM [0][1][2][3][4] has proven LLVM's viability as a launchpad for stable platforms. However, issues with compilation time and compiler size have suggested that the translator must do too much, i.e. LLVM IR isn't a low-level enough virtual machine. So we introduce DAGIR ("dagger"), a new portable close to the

1. I'm not sure what you mean by "full vector" here - using the same shift distance for all lanes (as opposed to per-lane distances), or doing a treat-the-vector-as-bag-of-bits shift that doesn't have any internal lane boundaries? If the latter, that doesn't really help you much with implementing a per-lane rotate. I think the most useful generalization of a vector