similar to: Register Allocation Graph Coloring algorithm and Others

> On Jun 14, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On 15 Jun 2017, at 6:50 AM, Louis Gerbarg <lgerbarg at apple.com <mailto:lgerbarg at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at

On 11 May 2017 at 18:30, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I note that on your bug that you have stated that the branch is faster than > the conditional move. Faster code is a side effect of the fix in this > particular case. On the contrary: the faster code is pretty much the only reason this can happen before the rest of the FENV support lands.

Hi I tried to install the sem package and it was succsessful but I keep getting the following message Paket 'sem' erfolgreich ausgepackt und MD5 Summen abgeglichen Die heruntergeladenen Pakete sind in C:\Users\Dean\AppData\Local\Temp\RtmpVRxlLZ\downloaded_packages aktualisiere HTML Paketbeschreibungen Warning message: In file.create(f.tg) : kann Datei

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I’m working on a port of musl libc to macos (arch triple is “x86_64-xnu-musl”) to solve some irreconcilable issues I’m having with libSystem.dylib. I don’t want to use glibc for various reasons, mainly because I want to static link. I have static PIE + ASLR working

I have a problem with winbind resolving global groups on a trusted NT Domain. I want to use SQUID and NTLM Authentification and therefore the external authentification helper needs to check if a user belongs to a given group. When I do 'windbind -r DOMAIN+USER GROUP', only groups of the local domain are listed. It seems as if winbind couldn't find a domain controller for the trusted

Hello. Could you please tell me how can I implement best a live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions, which is already available in http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/LiveIntervalAnalysis_8cpp_source.html)? I need to analyze the standard LLVM IR (list of Instruction *) and decide for each SSA variable what is it's live(ness) interval. My problem is that I

Hi all, I am having the same issue that is described in an older thread here: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-February/213656.html The problem I am facing is that the machine accounts are not trusted in the domain (this is true for all Win 10 Systems). The issue with the computer is from my pov: Folgende herausgefilterte Gruppenrichtlinien werden nicht angewendet.

You can use: http://www.rw.cdl.uni-saarland.de/~grund/papers/cgo08-liveness.pdf -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Alex Susu via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 9:39 PM To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions) Hello. Could you

Dear all When trying to install my package on Windows XP on my Mac, I get the following error: ---------- Making package xps ------------ ... ... xpsDict.cxx "C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin/link" /dll /def:xps.def /out:xps.dll fp10.obj -opt:noref -nologo -include:_G__cpp_setupG__Hist -include:_G__cpp_setupG__Graf1 -include:_G__cpp_setupG__G3D

Hi everyone, I?m currently trying to use opus on a ST ARM (STM32F407) without any OS (bare metal). The aim of my project is to transmit voice over CAN bus. The main issue I have is that opus fail to allocate memory, the ALLOC macro always return a NULL pointer. I have sure that I have enough free space to allocate buffers. Is there anyone who already try this or have meet this issue ? Thanks

Hey Greg, On 08-09-2020 22:07, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Greg Thelen dixit: > >> This doesn't work with older versions of make. ?make 4.2.1 seems common >> now and does not support $(shell command). >> >> $ cat Makefile >> $(info take1: $(shell command -v ls)) >> $(info take2: $(shell bash -c 'type -p ls')) >> >> all: >>

On 11/08/2013 09:12 AM, Steve Capper wrote: > + > +/* > + * x19-x28 are callee saved, also save fp, lr, sp. > + * d8-d15 are also callee saved. > + */ > + > +struct __jmp_buf { > + uint64_t __gregs[13]; > + uint64_t __fpregs[8]; > +}; > + Since the index of these arrays have no connection with what is stored in them, they should be named fields in the structure,

Hi Ben, >Thorsten: I've attached a patch which I tested briefly in QEMU. Let me >know if this works for you. sorry for the delay. I was able to test this on eller today. To reproduce the issue, this was needed, because the value read was a nanosecond field and so the test didn?t always fail: (sid_mips64el-dchroot)tg at eller:~$ while sleep 0.1; do :>b; ./mksh -c 'test a -nt

Hi Rowland, On 20.10.19 19:16, Rowland penny wrote: > On 20/10/2019 16:52, Martin Tessun via samba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am having the same issue that is described in an older thread here: >> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-February/213656.html >> >> The problem I am facing is that the machine accounts are not trusted >> in the domain

Hello. Thank you very much for the research paper. I will try to make use of the algorithms it presents. I just want to add that I found a 3rd party project doing dataflow analysis for LLVM IR at https://github.com/rohitjha/cse231-proj2. As written at http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~r1jha/#five , the project's description is: "Dataflow Analysis Framework for LLVM This is an

The Cray and tru64 patches I have, have been applied. Unless there is any major "oh my god it does not work". I believe 3.6 should now be ready for release soon. I'd like to thank everyone for providing feedback on the status of their their platform. Hopefully, we have not missed any platform that is commonly used. - Ben

On 2020-07-27 19:20, hpa at zytor.com wrote: > > I'm not so sure they have dealt with it in the sense of having it work on all architectures. *Most* of the problems are related to the shifting the arguments by one, which can cause a bunch of problems, especially if it means the arguments spill to memory. However, I have absolutely no idea how to correctly implement syscall(3) on s390

On 12/14/2017 10:18 PM, Leslie Zhai wrote: > Hi GCC and LLVM developers, > > I am learning Register Allocation algorithms and I am clear that: > > * Unlimited VirtReg (pseudo) -> limited or fixed or alias[1] PhysReg > (hard) > > * Memory (20 - 100 cycles) is expensive than Register (1 cycle), but > it has to spill code when PhysReg is unavailable > It might be

.Call("compute_values_cpp") Also, if you were passing arguments to the C++ function you would need to declare the function differently. Do a search on "Rcpp calling C++ functions from R" HTH, Eric On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Martin M?ller Skarbiniks Pedersen < traxplayer at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have written a small C++ function and compile it.

--- configure.ac | 2 +- golang/Makefile.am | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 4e2bc65..9abec95 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1530,7 +1530,7 @@ AS_IF([test "x$enable_golang" != "xno"],[ AC_CHECK_PROG([GOLANG],[go],[go],[no]) AS_IF([test "x$GOLANG" !=