similar to: target porting : objdump is not giving proper registers.

Sorry if this is a duplicate: I tried to send it last night and it didn't go through. I'm trimming some text to see if it helps. I have a simple program that fails on the Microblaze: int main() { unsigned long long x, y; x = 100; y = 0x8000000000000000ULL; return !(x > y); } As you can see, the test case compares two unsigned long long values. To try to track

Hello All, I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. When I try to link this object file with microblaze GCC linker I am getting below errors and debug symbols are missing in it. mb-objdump: DWARF error: found dwarf version '15877', this reader only handles version 2, 3, 4 and 5 information

On Saturday, April 18, 2020, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:02 AM Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to >> generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. >>

Hi James, Thanks for reply. When I looked in to the generated debug dump from the object file I found that DW_AT_name is always (indirect string, offset: 0x0): clang version 8.0.1, instead of variable names. Below is a sample output of the debug dump. Compilation Unit @ offset 0x0: Length: 0x6a (32-bit) Version: 4 Abbrev Offset: 0x0 Pointer Size: 4

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:11 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, not sure - you mention the linker produces errors, but the errors you showed looked like objdump errors? Were those errors from trying to dump the linked executable, and not errors that were produced by the linker itself? Yes, as mentioned earlier I was able to generate final executable but it

Hi, i'm working on a microblaze port extremely similar to microblaze that only has data hazards. The advice given to look at PPC and ARM is poor because neither of them check for data dependencies and are entirely complicated and different. The port has a 5 stage pipeline where the result of instruction can only be used at stage 3 and 5 only whereas load and store instructions require 4

Hi everyone I'm fairly new with LLVM and I've been searching around but couldn't find info on this subject. I started working on a target for a new cpu and I realizing my initial simple understanding of instruction itineraries may be completely off. I'm trying to model a CPU that has a latency of 2 cycles for multiplications fully pipelined (so it can start a new one after one

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Miguel G <miguel at esenciatech.com> wrote: > Hi everyone > I'm fairly new with LLVM and I've been searching around but couldn't find > info on this subject. > I started working on a target for a new cpu and I realizing my initial > simple understanding of instruction itineraries may be completely off. > I'm trying to model a

Hello, this is a very dump question, I hope to do more valuable question soon, but for now I'm just trying to run a simple hello world in C for clang and llvm to the target mblaze, but is not working. ( I need to change the compiler in the next stage) I past all the weekend tried to run this, and I was unable, I did the build of llVM/clang, but no bin was generate, only silly folder that I

Thanks Eli. Somehow I was assuming the scheduler would insert NOPs to enforce latencies The CPU I'm dealing with doesn't automatically stall, i.e. latency must be ensured by the program. As an alternative to a pass, is it feasible to modify the scheduler to do so (optionally) or it would be too complicated. If possible, what would be the right place to look ? Thanks so much Miguel On

Hi, maybe ist a general Problem. i have the following question. Wheni create manually a DNS record with RSAT Tools there is no problem. The following steps i try to get automatically updates. The following steps i have done. - Remove the Computer from AD - Remove DNS Record (checked also with ldbsearch for the principal, nothing found) - Join the Computer back to

While trying to fix a bug where llvm-objdump isn't printing relocations retained with ld -emit-relocs in shared object or executables, it seems like there isn't a way to split printing dynamic relocations from non-dynamic relocations as with GNU objdump -r and -R. I was thinking of adding a function RelocationRef::isDynamic() and filtering them this way when printing. Since RelocationRef

Hi, i have the following problem. I use the remote administration tools. I added a forward lookupzone A Record and would automtically add the suitable PTR Record. A Record was added but i miss the PTR Record. I have a foreward and reverse lookup zone. I use 4.1.6 and use now 4.1.11. Before it worked. I read at the wiki out that the sam.ldb.d and dns/sam.ldb.d are hard links. I checked that

Hello i see that the address of specific symbol are not the same between llvm-objdump and objdump. The code: --- #include <stdio.h> int machin = 42; int main () { printf("Hello : %d\n", machin); return 0; } ---- compile command: clang hello1.c -o hello1 And the address of the symbol of the global variable "machin": [ Fri Mar 08 - 22:58:36 ][ wwolff at hostname

Hi, i have two DCs and they are replicate find. No errors. I use rsync to replicate the sysvol folder. If I have a Windows 7 Machine over time it both DCs are used to load the GPOs. When the Second DCs is used I get a GPO error. I found that the folders and files are not with the correct xattr acls. I user rsync with -X to sync xattr acls. I sed getfacl to compare the uids. I use sernet 4.1.9 but

Hi, how can i get work Samba 4 Sernet 4.1.7 correctly with NIS. Ist provisioned with rfc2307. When i query a User withi get the following. getent passwd testswi SWI\testswi:*:10000:100:testswi:/home/SWI/testswi:/bin/false I want to change /bin/false to a other value /bin/bash I tried many things to change the value. 1. ldbedit -e vim -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb samaccountname=testswi

Hello LLVM, Previously, some folks wanted llvm-objdump to behave more like GNU objdump. This could encompass both command line options and output format. Such a change helps developers already familiar with GNU tools and allows re-use of Perl scripts or other automation expecting to see GNU style dumps. Is moving llvm-objdump toward GNU objdump the general preference? And what about otools

That works. Thanks. One more followup question though. Once i run opt on bitcode, there is not useful output/transform on bitcode. this rpt files are extra. I am hoping to do something like this, ; RUN: FileCheck --input-file=a.rpt.gold --check-prefix=CHECK-A < a.rpt ; RUN: FileCheck --input-file=b.rpt.gold --check-prefix=CHECK-B < b.rpt i did not find much examples in tests hence

Hi all, I have n no. of extensions in my dialer. from 456 to 556 extensions. I was created 2 other extensions 667 and 668 I need to allow only STD calls to go from this extensions. These all extensions are same context . I need to define the STD dialplan for only this 2 extensions. how I can ? Best Regards, Mahesh Katta *BUZZ**WORKS* Business Services Private Limited BANGALORE | CHENNAI |

Hi, I'm trying to make a attended transfer through AMI. I though i could use Atxfer, and it seems ok, but nothing happens. And I can't find any how-to or description on how to do this. What more do I have to do to make this work? In Asterisk Call Manager: Action: Atxfer Channel: SIP/36-xxxxxx Exten: 33 Priority: 1 Context: Phone Response: Success Message: Atxfer successfully queued