similar to: Announcing Gluster release 4.0.1 (Short Term Maintenance)

Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the CentOS Storage SIG. On 03/27/2018 08:53 PM, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 > please? > > On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com >

Hi, Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 please? On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster > 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). > > Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. > > Thanks, > Gluster community > > [1]

Hi, Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while to find a 4.0 version at, https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage On 28 March 2018 at 14:37, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > > Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS > Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while > to find a 4.0 version at, > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage The announcement for Gluster 4.0 in CentOS should contain all the details that you need as well:

I think we are missing 3.12.7 in CentOS releases. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while >> to find a 4.0 version at, >> >>

On 09/05/2017 02:07 PM, Serkan ?oban wrote: > For rpm packages you can use [1], just installed without any problems. > It is taking time packages to land in Centos storage SIG repo... Thank you for reporting this. The SIG does take a while to get updated with the latest bits. We are looking at ways to improve that in the future. > > [1]

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.7 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause file corruption - Sharded volumes are typically used for VM

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 >>

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.9 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages:

The Gluster community celebrates 13 years of development with this latest release, Gluster 4.0. This release enables improved integration with containers, an enhanced user experience, and a next-generation management framework. The 4.0 release helps cloud-native app developers choose Gluster as the default scale-out distributed file system. We?re highlighting some of the announcements, major

Hi, RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on its way. We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to test the same and return some feedback. We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the final release to happen, so shout out in case you face any blockers. The RC1 packages should land here:

Hi Shyam, 2018-03-01 22:08 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>: > On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm >> >> # yum install -y >>

It is sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with 3.11.3 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. >> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.

On 03/05/2018 09:05 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> I am about halfway through my own upgrade testing (using centOS7 >> containers), and it is patterned around this [1], in case that helps. > Taking a look at this. > > Thanks for confirming the install of the bits. On the upgrade front, I did find some issues that are since fixed. We are in the process for rolling out the GA

Hi, Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads. With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s I did not change any volume options in both configs. Any thoughts? Serkan

On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: > This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > # yum install -y > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0/glusterfs-4.0.0-0.1.rc1.el7.x86_64.rpm Thanks Javier. Isn't this what you intended though? yum upgrade

On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote: > Hi, > > Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. > 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads. > With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s > With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s > I did not change any volume

On 10/31/2017 08:36 PM, Ben Turner wrote: >> * Erasure coded volumes with sharding - seen as a good fit for VM disk >> storage > I am working on this with a customer, we have been able to do 400-500 MB / sec writes! Normally things max out at ~150-250. The trick is to use multiple files, create the lvm stack and use native LVM striping. We have found that 4-6 files seems to give

Meeting date: 05/02/2018 (May 02nd, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 * Download: <TBD> Attendance * Raghavendra M (Raghavendra Bhat), Kaleb, Atin, Amar, Nithya, Rafi, Shyam Agenda * Commitment (GPLv2 Cure) * Email and Patch * [amarts] 20+ people already have done +1. Will wait another

On 01/04/2018 12:58 PM, WK wrote: > I'm reading that the new kernel will slow down context switches. That is > of course a big deal with FUSE mounts. > > Has anybody installed the new kernels yet and observed any performance > degradation? We are in the process of testing the same out. Hopefully later next week we would be able to post the numbers that we observe. Other