Gluster users - Oct 2017 - [Gluster-Maintainers] Rqelease 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

+1

Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release
cycle.

On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at
redhat.com> wrote:

On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
>
>> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/
>>
>>     [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506
>>     <https://review.gluster.org/18506>
>>
>> Hi,
>
> Both issues looks like a regression. Master patch [2] got merged in master
> but [1] is still pending.
> @Rafi : Can you get the reviews done ASAP and merge it on master.
> I hope both can be make it in 3.12 before the time deadline. If not please
> let me know.
>
Yes, both issues are a regression, but the release deadline is past, it can
always land in the next release or in an async release (3.12.2-2) if there
is a need from users to absolutely have these fixes earlier in the builds.
Further these have existed since 3.12.0 (If I read this right).

I suggest the release train continue on schedule and not wait in the
future. Think about what we would have done if we found these issues an
hour after release tagging (or the release announcement for that matter).

Thanks,
Shyam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171012/78ff1297/attachment.html>

http://risovach.ru/kartinka/7844170


?


:-D



12.10.2017 20:40, Amar Tumballi ?????:
> +1
>
> Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop 
> release cycle.
>
> On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at
redhat.com
> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
>
>
>             [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/
>             <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/>
>
>             ? ? [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506
>             <https://review.gluster.org/18506>
>             ? ? <https://review.gluster.org/18506
>             <https://review.gluster.org/18506>>
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Both issues looks like a regression. Master patch [2] got
>         merged in master but [1] is still pending.
>         @Rafi : Can you get the reviews done ASAP and merge it on master.
>         I hope both can be make it in 3.12 before the time deadline.
>         If not please let me know.
>
>
>     Yes, both issues are a regression, but the release deadline is
>     past, it can always land in the next release or in an async
>     release (3.12.2-2) if there is a need from users to absolutely
>     have these fixes earlier in the builds. Further these have existed
>     since 3.12.0 (If I read this right).
>
>     I suggest the release train continue on schedule and not wait in
>     the future. Think about what we would have done if we found these
>     issues an hour after release tagging (or the release announcement
>     for that matter).
>
>     Thanks,
>     Shyam
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171012/ce60425d/attachment.html>