similar to: IMP: Release 4.0: CentOS 6 packages will not be made available

On 11/01/2018 18:32, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Gluster Users, > > This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for > CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means > that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. > > Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates > till Release 4.3

Forwarding to the devel and users groups as well. We have tagged 4.0.0 branch as GA, and are in the process of building packages. It would a good time to run final install/upgrade tests if you get a chance on these packages (I am running off to do the same now). Thanks, Shyam -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.0.0 released

>From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13 Should we have a Gluster Community slack team? I'm interested in everyone's thoughts on this. - amye -- Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead

Awesome! You're on the list. Anyone else want to present? - amye On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote: > I propose a talk > > "Life of a gluster client process" > > We will have a look at one complete life cycle of a client process > which includes: > * mount script and parsing of args > * contacting glusterd

We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective on what things we as a community should stop, what we should start, and what we should continue. With last week's release, here's our quick form for 3.11 https://goo.gl/forms/OkhNZDFspYqdN00g2 We'll keep this open until June 15th to give everyone time to give us feedback. Thanks! -- Amye Scavarda | amye at

Hi all! Based on the popularity of wanting more lightning talks at Gluster Summit, we'll be trying something new: Gluster Developer Conversations. This will be a one hour meeting on November 28th at UTC 15:00, with five 5 minute lightning talks and time for discussion in between. The meeting will be recorded, and I'll be posting the individual talks separately in our community channels.

Resolved! Try it again. - amye On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Amye, > > The form is not accessible, it says > > Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release > The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting > responses. > Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. > > >

I propose a talk "Life of a gluster client process" We will have a look at one complete life cycle of a client process which includes: * mount script and parsing of args * contacting glusterd and fetching volfile * loading and initializing the xlators * how glusterd sends updates of volume options * brick disconnection/reconnection * glusterd disconnection/reconnection * termination of

Hi Amye, The form is not accessible, it says Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting responses. Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. Regards Rafi KC On 06/05/2017 01:25 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective > on what things we as a

Hey all! In the spirit of trying something new with the Community Meeting, this next one is changing a bit. I'm calling it 'Gluster Global Meetup' for lack of a better name (names welcomed) - and we're putting it on a video call. Same time as the community meeting, but a little different on the format. Here's a video call link for this that I'll add to the community

It's great idea! :) But think about creating Slack for all RedHat provided opensource projects. For example one Slack workspace with separated Gluster, Ceph, Fedora etc. channels. I can't wait for it! Bartosz On 08.11.2017 22:22, Amye Scavarda wrote: > From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: > https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com> wrote: > Le vendredi 01 septembre 2017 ? 14:02 +0100, Michael Scherer a ?crit : >> Le mercredi 30 ao?t 2017 ? 12:11 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit : >> > Hello, >> > >> > To reduce confusion, we've setup docs.gluster.org pointing to >> > gluster.readthedocs.org. Both URLs will

On 08/17/2016 09:56 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > I propose to present on one or more of the following topics: > > * NFS-Ganesha Architecture, Roadmap, and Status,Jiffin Thotton copresenter. > * Architecture of the High Availability Solution for Ganesha and Samba > - detailed walk through and demo of current implementation > - difference between the current and storhaug

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Amye Scavarda wrote: > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com> wrote: > > Le vendredi 01 septembre 2017 ? 14:02 +0100, Michael Scherer a ?crit : > >> Le mercredi 30 ao?t 2017 ? 12:11 +0530, Nigel Babu a ?crit : > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > To reduce confusion,

@Amye +1 for this great Idea, I am 100% for it. @Vijay for archiving purposes maybe it will be possible to use free service as https://slackarchive.io/ <https://slackarchive.io/> BR, Martin > On 9 Nov 2017, at 00:09, Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com <mailto:amye at

> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com <mailto:amye at redhat.com>> wrote: > From today's community meeting, we had an item from the issue queue: > https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13 <https://github.com/gluster/community/issues/13> > > Should we have a Gluster Community slack team? I'm interested in >

The archival process of the mailing list makes searching for past issues possible. Slack, and irc in general, is a more closed garden than a public archived mailing list. That said, irc/slack is good for immediate interaction between people, say, gluster user with a nightmare and a knowledgeable developer with deep understanding and willingness to assist. If there's a way to make a

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote: > The archival process of the mailing list makes searching for past issues > possible. Slack, and irc in general, is a more closed garden than a public > archived mailing list. > > That said, irc/slack is good for immediate interaction between people, say, > gluster user with a nightmare and a

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:21:08PM +1000, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > > > > This feature (and the patent) is from facebook folks. > > > > > Does that mean its not a problem? Facebook contributed the patches for this feature, so I don't think there is a problem. Niels (not a lawyer)

On 07/12/2017 13:47, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Out of curiosity,? did you write it or you found those > commands somewhere else? I wrote it, using what little experience of pcs I have so far - haven't actually been able to find any documented steps/instructions. :( Although this blog - http://www.tomvernon.co.uk/blog/2015/01/gluster-activepassive-cluster/ - suggested I was on the right