similar to: Release 4.0: RC1 tagged

On 02/26/2018 02:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on > its way. > > We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to > test the same and return some feedback. > > We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the > final release to happen, so

Hi all, Have tested on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) with Kernel 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 This package works ok http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm # yum install http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm # yum install glusterfs-server # systemctl

On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: > This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > # yum install -y > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0/glusterfs-4.0.0-0.1.rc1.el7.x86_64.rpm Thanks Javier. Isn't this what you intended though? yum upgrade

I found the following memory leak present in 3.13, 4.0 and master: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550078 I will clone/port to 4.0 as soon as the patch is merged. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Javier Romero <xavinux at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Have tested on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) with Kernel > 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 > > This

Hi Shyam, 2018-03-01 22:08 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>: > On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm >> >> # yum install -y >>

Hi, We have tagged and created RC0 packages for the 4.0 release of Gluster. Details of the packages are given below. We request community feedback from the RC stages, so that the end release can be better, towards this please test and direct any feedback to the lists for us to take a look at. CentOS packages: CentOS7: # yum install

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while > to find a 4.0 version at, > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage The announcement for Gluster 4.0 in CentOS should contain all the details that you need as well:

On 03/05/2018 09:05 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> I am about halfway through my own upgrade testing (using centOS7 >> containers), and it is patterned around this [1], in case that helps. > Taking a look at this. > > Thanks for confirming the install of the bits. On the upgrade front, I did find some issues that are since fixed. We are in the process for rolling out the GA

On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number > of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the > 30th of Apr instead. > > Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? > Hi, yes, it's this: https://review.gluster.org/19730

Gluster Users, This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates till Release 4.3 of gluster (which is slated around Dec, 2018). The decision is due to the following,

On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >>> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >>> 30th of Apr instead.

On 11/01/2018 18:32, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Gluster Users, > > This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for > CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means > that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. > > Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates > till Release 4.3

On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >> 30th of Apr instead. >> >> Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release?

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 >>

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.0/4.0.1/ [2] Release notes: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/v4.0.1/doc/release-notes/4.0.1.md

Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the CentOS Storage SIG. On 03/27/2018 08:53 PM, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 > please? > > On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com >

Hi Niels, FYI - tested the install of the 3.13.0-1.el7 packages and all seems well with the install under CentOS 7. yum install -y https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/centos-release-gluster313/1.0/1.el7.centos/noarch/centos-release-gluster313-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm

On 09/05/2017 02:07 PM, Serkan ?oban wrote: > For rpm packages you can use [1], just installed without any problems. > It is taking time packages to land in Centos storage SIG repo... Thank you for reporting this. The SIG does take a while to get updated with the latest bits. We are looking at ways to improve that in the future. > > [1]

Currently running 3.8.12, planning to rolling upgrade it to 3.8.15 this weekend. * debian 8 * 3 nodes * Replica 3 * Sharded * VM Hosting only The release notes strongly recommend upgrading to 3.10 * Is there any downside to staying on 3.8.15 for a while longer? * I didn't see anything I had to have in 3.10, but ongoing updates are always good :( This mildly concerned me:

On 08/25/2017 09:17 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > Currently running 3.8.12, planning to rolling upgrade it to 3.8.15 this > weekend. > > * debian 8 > * 3 nodes > * Replica 3 > * Sharded > * VM Hosting only > > The release notes strongly recommend upgrading to 3.10 > > * Is there any downside to staying on 3.8.15 for a while longer? 3.8 will