similar to: Ip based peer probe volume create error

Hi, Could you please send me the glusterd.logs and cmd-history logs from all the nodes. Thanks Gaurav On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Ercan Aydo?an <ercan.aydogan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > i have dedicated 3.11.3 version glusterfs 3 nodes. i can create volumes if > peer probe with hostname. > > But ip based probe it?s not working. > > What?s the correct

Hi, i attached logs. node3_cmd_history.log is empty because i did not run any command on node3. At logs i saw node 1 peer status contains ip addresses as peer. But other nodes node1 visible at it?s name . node 1 peer status is root at pri:/var/log/glusterfs# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 2 Hostname: 51.15.90.60 Uuid: eed0d6c6-90ef-4705-b3f9-0b028d769df3 State: Peer in Cluster

>From glusterd.logs, It looks like address resolution issue in "glusterd_brickinfo_new_from_brick" functon call. After seeing command history, I could see that you have 3 nodes, and firstly you are peer probing 51.15.90.60 and 163.172.151.120 from 51.15.77.14 So here itself you have 3 node cluster, after all this you are going on node 2 and again peer probing 51.15.77.14. Ideally

I changed /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 pri.ostechnix.lan pri 51.15.90.60 sec.ostechnix.lan sec 163.172.151.120 third.ostechnix.lan third on every node matching hostname to 127.0.0.1 then root at pri:~# apt-get purge glusterfs-server root at pri:~# rm -rf /var/lib/glusterd/ root at pri:~# rm -rf /var/log/glusterfs/ root at pri:~# apt-get install glusterfs-server root at pri:~#

Hello, i installed glusterfs 3.11.3 version 3 nodes ubuntu 16.04 machine. All machines have same /etc/hosts. node1 hostname pri.ostechnix.lan node2 hostname sec.ostechnix.lan node2 hostname third.ostechnix.lan 51.15.77.14 pri.ostechnix.lan pri 51.15.90.60 sec.ostechnix.lan sec 163.172.151.120 third.ostechnix.lan third volume create command is root at

I'm guessing there's something wrong w.r.t address resolution on node 1. >From the logs it's quite clear to me that node 1 is unable to resolve the address configured in /etc/hosts where as the other nodes do. Could you paste the gluster peer status output from all the nodes? Also can you please check if you're able to ping "pri.ostechnix.lan" from node1 only? Does

Did you do gluster peer probe? Check out the documentation: http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Storage%20Pools/ On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Ercan Aydo?an <ercan.aydogan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > i installed glusterfs 3.11.3 version 3 nodes ubuntu 16.04 machine. All > machines have same /etc/hosts. > > node1 hostname > pri.ostechnix.lan

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080701/3140c7d2/attachment.htm

Hello Gluster users: sorry for long post, I have run out of ideas here, kindly let me know if i am looking at right places for logs and any suggested actions.....thanks a sudden power loss casued hard reboot - now the volume does not start Glusterfs- 3.3.1 on Centos 6.1 transport: TCP sharing volume over NFS for VM storage - VHD Files Type: distributed - only 1 node (brick) XFS (LVM)

Hi all, I think this problem is well known, but I cannot say the same for the solution.. A similar issue was discussed in this mailing list: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2008-08/msg01039.html There are also two bug reports about it, which are marked as resolved, somehow... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426861

Hello all, I am trying to run a simulation. the simulation presented below. > rep=5 > sr=.10 # selection ratio > pmin=.10 # minority ratio > nap=1000 # total number of applicant > nsle=sr*nap # number of ee selected > nb=nap*pmin # number of minority > nw=nap-nb # number of majority > mb=100 # mean minority > sb=15 # sd minority > mw=100 # mean majority > sw=15 #

I'm using Syslinux 6.03. I'm using FONT command. I have converted cp857.08, cp857.14 and cp857.16 these are KBD Project fonts to PSF file format. My isolinux.cfg file's encoding is CP857 (Turkish VGA/DOS Font Encoding). But FONT command doesn't work. My isolinux.cfg file's content is below: FONT cp857.psf SAY ??i????????? But these characters (??i?????????) don't

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080613/fe8f10a8/attachment.htm

Hi everyone, I generated my own DomU guest using opensuse''s yast dirinstall and stored it on a seperate iscsi target. I created it as a DomU on my Domain0 (2.6.25.16-0.1-xen kernel) successfully, using the following configuration: name = "vm01-opensuse11-base-LAMP" memory = 256 kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-xen" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-xen" root =

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:56 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 22:08 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > So, I was waiting to hear a definitive response on whether using aliases > is hard, and didn't see one here, which is why I haven't responded further. > > However, a colleauge pointed me at an LKML thread where it seems

From: Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> Without this, configure will always enable erlang, no matter what argument are passed. Now, we can disable it, even if configure still need the erlang compiler for some obscure reason. --- configure.ac | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 337a3ed..e0bed2f 100644 ---

Quick response to a detail, I'll respond to more of this when i have more time. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang in > 32-bit mode? __x86_indirect_thunk __x86_indirect_thunk_eax __x86_indirect_thunk_ecx __x86_indirect_thunk_edx > I've added

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:16 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:56 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> > wrote: > >> At this point, what we really want is for identical thunks to have >> identical names — just like we do for builtins and other stuff, to avoid >> having differences between clang and GCC

On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 00:26 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:16 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com > > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:56 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org > > > wrote: > > > At this point, what we really want is for identical thunks to > > > have identical names — just like we do for

Hi, Is there any up to date info on the state of lld in darwin mode? I realize it's not being updated much, but does it work for all darwin targets? Are there things that don't work?