similar to: ETA for 3.10.12 (was "Planned for the 30th of Mar, 2018")

On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number > of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the > 30th of Apr instead. > > Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? > Hi, yes, it's this: https://review.gluster.org/19730

On 09/04/2018 21:36, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: >> On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >>> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >>> 30th of Apr instead.

On 04/09/2018 04:48 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > On 06/04/2018 19:33, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number >> of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the >> 30th of Apr instead. >> >> Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release?

Hi, We postponed this and I did not announce this to the lists. The number of bugs fixed against 3.10.12 is low, and I decided to move this to the 30th of Apr instead. Is there a specific fix that you are looking for in the release? Thanks, Shyam On 04/06/2018 11:47 AM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani wrote: > Hi, > are there any news for 3.10.12 release? > > Regards, >

Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Marco Lorenzo Crociani < marcoc at prismatelecomtesting.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 > on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs

Hi, I'm hitting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442983 on glusterfs 3.10.11 and oVirt 4.1.9 (and before on glusterfs 3.8.14) The bug report says fixed in glusterfs-3.12.2-1 Is there a plan to backport the fix to 3.10.x releases or the only way to fix is upgrade to 3.12? Regards, -- Marco Crociani

Hi, this patch it's already available in the community version of gluster 3.12? In which version? If not, there is plan to backport it? Greetings, ??? Paolo Il 16/03/2018 13:24, Atin Mukherjee ha scritto: > Have sent a backport request https://review.gluster.org/19730 at > release-3.10 branch. Hopefully this fix will be picked up in next update. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at

Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all

Fix that when scrub tries to repair an I/O or checksum error and one of the devices containing the mirror is missing, it crashes in bio_add_page because the bdev is a NULL pointer for missing devices. Reported-by: Marco L. Crociani <marco.crociani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Hi, RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on its way. We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to test the same and return some feedback. We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the final release to happen, so shout out in case you face any blockers. The RC1 packages should land here:

Meeting date: 05/02/2018 (May 02nd, 2018), 19:30 IST, 14:00 UTC, 10:00 EDT BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/205933580 * Download: <TBD> Attendance * Raghavendra M (Raghavendra Bhat), Kaleb, Atin, Amar, Nithya, Rafi, Shyam Agenda * Commitment (GPLv2 Cure) * Email and Patch * [amarts] 20+ people already have done +1. Will wait another

Gluster Users, This is to inform you that from the 4.0 release onward, packages for CentOS 6 will not be built by the gluster community. This also means that the CentOS SIG will not receive updates for 4.0 gluster packages. Gluster release 3.12 and its predecessors will receive CentOS 6 updates till Release 4.3 of gluster (which is slated around Dec, 2018). The decision is due to the following,

Currently running 3.8.12, planning to rolling upgrade it to 3.8.15 this weekend. * debian 8 * 3 nodes * Replica 3 * Sharded * VM Hosting only The release notes strongly recommend upgrading to 3.10 * Is there any downside to staying on 3.8.15 for a while longer? * I didn't see anything I had to have in 3.10, but ongoing updates are always good :( This mildly concerned me:

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 >>

On 08/25/2017 09:17 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > Currently running 3.8.12, planning to rolling upgrade it to 3.8.15 this > weekend. > > * debian 8 > * 3 nodes > * Replica 3 > * Sharded > * VM Hosting only > > The release notes strongly recommend upgrading to 3.10 > > * Is there any downside to staying on 3.8.15 for a while longer? 3.8 will

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.0/4.0.1/ [2] Release notes: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/v4.0.1/doc/release-notes/4.0.1.md

Hi Shyam, 2018-03-01 22:08 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>: > On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: >> This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm >> >> # yum install -y >>

On 02/28/2018 07:25 AM, Javier Romero wrote: > This one fails http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1548/311548/centos-release-gluster40-0.9-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > # yum install -y > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0/glusterfs-4.0.0-0.1.rc1.el7.x86_64.rpm Thanks Javier. Isn't this what you intended though? yum upgrade

Hi, Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads. With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s I did not change any volume options in both configs. Any thoughts? Serkan

Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the CentOS Storage SIG. On 03/27/2018 08:53 PM, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 > please? > > On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com >