similar to: investigate & troubleshoot speed bottleneck(s) - how?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "investigate & troubleshoot speed bottleneck(s) - how?"

2011 Aug 01
0
dbench strange results
Hi I'm building new samba server (on Debian 6.0, software RAID10 2TB, Xeon CPU). Generally everything is working fine, so I have decided to run some stress tests. My choice was dbench. Old server is Debian 4.0 (samba 3.0.24, Athlon 3000+, one ATA 160GB disk). So run dbench 16 on both old and new server The results are strange old serwer: about 300MB/sek (dbench 3.0) and below are first
2004 Sep 10
1
AW: AW: Incomplete format description?
Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch- link.de>: >According to the format description, the coding method has to be 0. > >I've been using libFLAC 1.0.4 to encode the stream. I've checked my interpretation against "flac -a" and it seems to read 17 bits for each warmup sample. Here is its output: frame=168 blocksize=4608
2005 Apr 10
0
rice format
hello, I am now develloping an embeded decoding system for flac.I have a problem about the format of the rice coding: the residual begins with : 01 01 08 0C the first two bytes are the warmups, the prediction order is 2. and the 080C is the following: 00 0010 0000 001100 the first two bits mean: residual coding method is partitioned rice the following four bits mean: the partition order is 2 ;
2005 Apr 17
0
rice format
--- CHI Hongliang <hongliang.chi@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: > hello, > > I am now develloping an embeded decoding system for flac.I have a > problem about the format of the rice coding: > > the residual begins with : 01 01 08 0C > > the first two bytes are the warmups, the prediction order is 2. and > the 080C is the following: > 00 0010 0000 001100 > >
2014 Dec 11
0
Two new CVEs against FLAC
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:54:15PM -0800, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > I think I have an alternative fix for the CVE which should not break > > seeking. I'm working on getting an copy of the file with which to test. > > Patch applied and pushed. I think this revives the CVE, at least in some configurations. The patch seems to cover
2005 Feb 20
0
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 7, Issue 260
> From: "James Bean" <james@hdcs.com.au> > Has anyone every setup an external open/close relay, off say a serial > interface, and have an extension trigger the relay? The following will do the trick. Just add a 5vdc solid state relay ('cause you can't sink too much current out of the RS232C port). Substitute "2", "4" or "6" in the
2004 Sep 10
2
Altivec, automake
Here's what I listed in that email. Merging doesn't appear to be necessary. If you have any build problems, let me know. Note that my detection code is Darwin-specific. It's a BSD call (sysctl()), so a change to the platform-detection macros should enable it to work on other BSDs. However, I don't know what that would be, and I couldn't determine any safe way to do the check
2004 Sep 10
3
AW: AW: Incomplete format description?
Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix. inf.upol.cz>: >If input is 16 bit, side channel will be 17 bit (16bit - 16bit is >17bit number). And warmup samples will be (17 - wasted_bits) bit. Voila, this was the source of all my frustration, sync problems and who knows what. My decoder now works correctly for files encoded with the default settings. Are
2004 Sep 10
1
Questions about FLAC format from a java coder...
Thanks Miroslav, for your help - much appreciated. > > RICE PARTITION SIZE: In a zero-partition-order Rice block, the > > documentation says the number of samples in the partition is equal > > to the frame's blocksize. Surely this should be equal to the > > frame's-blocksize-minus-the-predictor-order, since we shouldn't need > > to encode residual for
2006 May 28
2
Upgrade from R1.8.2 to R1.8.4
Hello you all, this is my first time on this forum because I recently started to learn this exciting "new" language and Frame stuff... anyway, I used to have Ruby 1.8.2 installed with Rails and I wrote some warmup applications on these. Yesterday I decided to update my Ruby and Rails... about 4-5 hours later I finished... it wasn''t easy but what is.. right? so I changed
2017 Jul 11
2
getting rid of hp c3180
On 7/11/2017 3:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > I faced the same issue some years ago, and found a low-priced mono > laser that lated me quite a few years. no color, but few thing I > wanted to print actually demanded color. my last two laser printers have been Brother black&white all-in-ones ("MFC"). *VERY* cheap per page printing costs, even if you use Brother brand toner
2014 Jun 30
2
[PATCH] stream_encoder : Improve selection of residual accumulator width
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:27:18AM +0400, lvqcl wrote: > lvqcl wrote: > > FLAC 1.2.1 and 1.3.0 cannot encode snippet6.wav with -7 and -8 encoding modes. > > But they are able to do this with --disable-fixed-subframes option. This > > implies that snippet6.wav triggers a problem somewthere inside > > FLAC__fixed_compute_residual(data[], data_len, order, residual[])
2004 Sep 10
1
Questions about FLAC format from a java coder...
Hi, I'm trying to write a FLAC decoder for my Java audio app. Can I ask a couple of questions to this list about the format? I think there are a couple of things not-quite-mentioned in the official spec. RICE CODING: Which order are Rice-coded numbers stored in? (a) [sign-bit][low-order bits]["k" zeroes][1] (b) [sign-bit]["k" zeroes][1][low-order bits] (c)
2015 May 06
2
[PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead
On 05/05/2015 07:21 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 05/03/2015 10:55 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> I did a small measurement of the pure locking functions on bare metal >> without and with my patches. >> >> spin_lock() for the first time (lock and code not in cache) dropped from >> about 600 to 500 cycles. >> >> spin_unlock() for first time dropped
2015 May 06
2
[PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead
On 05/05/2015 07:21 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 05/03/2015 10:55 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> I did a small measurement of the pure locking functions on bare metal >> without and with my patches. >> >> spin_lock() for the first time (lock and code not in cache) dropped from >> about 600 to 500 cycles. >> >> spin_unlock() for first time dropped
2015 Aug 14
2
Clunky Xorg with latest 6.7 upgrade?
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 23:51 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > Top shows > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java > > Well, what's process
2009 Feb 17
1
[LLVMdev] ARM backend playing with alternative jump table implementations
Hi list: I have been trying to get my feet wet with the ARM backend. As a warmup exercise I wanted to be able to move jumptables especially large ones out of the code section. Currently the idiom for jump tables loooks like this // .set PCRELV0, (.LJTI9_0_0-(.LPCRELL0+8)) // .LPCRELL0: // add r3, pc, #PCRELV0 // ldr pc, [r3, +r0, lsl #2] // .LJTI9_0_0: //
2015 May 17
0
[PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead
* Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> wrote: > On 05/05/2015 07:21 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >On 05/03/2015 10:55 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>I did a small measurement of the pure locking functions on bare metal > >>without and with my patches. > >> > >>spin_lock() for the first time (lock and code not in cache) dropped from >
2017 Jul 12
0
getting rid of hp c3180
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 04:09:15PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/11/2017 3:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >I faced the same issue some years ago, and found a low-priced mono > >laser that lated me quite a few years. no color, but few thing I > >wanted to print actually demanded color. > > my last two laser printers have been Brother black&white all-in-ones >
2004 Sep 10
0
AW: AW: Incomplete format description?
Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev "Tor-Einar Jarnbjo" <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch- link.de>: >- My implementation seems to decode fixed subframes now, but the lpc >subframes contains nothing but noise, and the bitstream is out of sync after >reading one. The source code I'm using for decoding the lpc subframe is >available here: