similar to: Announcing GlusterFS release 3.12.0 (Long Term Maintenance)

This is a major Gluster release that includes, features and bug fixes. Notable feature highlights are, * Ability to mount sub-directories using the Gluster native protocol (FUSE) * Brick multiplexing enhancements that help scale to larger brick counts per node * Enhancements to gluster get-state CLI enabling better understanding of various bricks and nodes participation/roles

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.0/4.0.1/ [2] Release notes: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/v4.0.1/doc/release-notes/4.0.1.md

It is sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with 3.11.3 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. >> 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads.

Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the CentOS Storage SIG. On 03/27/2018 08:53 PM, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 > please? > > On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com >

Hi, Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 please? On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster > 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). > > Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. > > Thanks, > Gluster community > > [1]

Hi, Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while to find a 4.0 version at, https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage On 28 March 2018 at 14:37, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > > Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS > Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.9 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages:

I think we are missing 3.12.7 in CentOS releases. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while >> to find a 4.0 version at, >> >>

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while > to find a 4.0 version at, > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage The announcement for Gluster 4.0 in CentOS should contain all the details that you need as well:

Hi, Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads. With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s I did not change any volume options in both configs. Any thoughts? Serkan

+1 Agree with Shyam. We can make more releases, but let's not stop release cycle. On 12-Oct-2017 8:32 PM, "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: On 10/12/2017 08:09 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > >> [2] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18489/ >> >> [1] : https://review.gluster.org/18506 >>

On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan ?oban wrote: > Hi, > > Just do some ingestion tests to 40 node 16+4EC 19PB single volume. > 100 clients are writing each has 5 threads total 500 threads. > With 3.10.5 each server has 800MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 32GB/s > With 3.12.0 each server has 200MB/s network traffic, cluster total is 8GB/s > I did not change any volume

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.7 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause file corruption - Sharded volumes are typically used for VM

Any idea when these packages will be in the CentOS mirrors? there is no sign of them on download.gluster.org. On 13 October 2017 at 08:45, Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan at redhat.com> wrote: > The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.2 > (packages available at [1,2,3]). > > Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. > > We still

The Gluster community celebrates 13 years of development with this latest release, Gluster 4.0. This release enables improved integration with containers, an enhanced user experience, and a next-generation management framework. The 4.0 release helps cloud-native app developers choose Gluster as the default scale-out distributed file system. We?re highlighting some of the announcements, major

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.2 (packages available at [1,2,3]). Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. We still carry following major issues that is reported in the release-notes as follows, 1.) - Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause file corruption Sharded volumes are typically used for VM images, if such volumes

Neil I don;t know if this is adequate but I did run a simple smoke test today on the 3.12.3-1 bits. I installed the 3.12.3-1 but on 3 fresh install Centos 7 VMs created a 2G image files and wrote a xfs files system on them on each system mount each under /export/brick1, and created /export/birck1/test on each node. probes the two other systems from one node (a). abd created a replica 3

Here are my results: Summary: I am not able to reproduce the problem, IOW I get relatively equivalent numbers for sequential IO when going against 3.10.5 or 3.12.0 Next steps: - Could you pass along your volfile (both for a brick and also the client vol file (from /var/lib/glusterd/vols/<yourvolname>/patchy.tcp-fuse.vol and a brick vol file from the same place) - I want to check

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.8 (packages available at [1,2,3]). Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.12/3.12.8/ [2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.12 [3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs [4]

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.6 (packages available at [1,2,3]). Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. We still carry following major issue that is reported in the release-notes as follows, 1.) - Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause file corruption ??? Sharded volumes are typically used for VM images, if such volumes