similar to: Changing performance.parallel-readdir to on causes CPU soft lockup and very high load all glusterd nodes

Hi, We're using a 3-node setup where GlusterFS is running as both a client and a server with a fuse mount-point. We tried to change the performance.parallel-readdir setting to on for a volume, but after that the load on all 3 nodes skyrocketed due to the glusterd process and we saw CPU soft lockup errors in the console. I had to completely bring down/reboot all 3 nodes and disable the

By chance... it's not 3 replica, 1 arbiter is it? See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512371> -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Niels Hendriks <niels at nuvini.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a 3-node gluster setup where gluster is both the server and the > client. > Every few days we have some $random file or directory that does not exist > according to the FUSE mountpoint. When we try to access the file (stat, > cat, etc...) the filesystem reports that the

On 16 April 2018 at 14:07, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Niels Hendriks <niels at nuvini.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have a 3-node gluster setup where gluster is both the server and the >> client. >> Every few days we have some $random file or directory that does not exist

Hi, We have a 3-node gluster setup where gluster is both the server and the client. Every few days we have some $random file or directory that does not exist according to the FUSE mountpoint. When we try to access the file (stat, cat, etc...) the filesystem reports that the file/directory does not exist, even though it does. When we try to create the file/directory we receive the following error

All, After two days of googling, reading, swearing and cursing, I am finally admitting I cannot solve this one. I have three production FreeBSD servers running various network utilities (DHCP, bacula, zabix, syslog, rsync). These have been running fine for several years. As a primary Windows domain (accounting firm. Not much choice), I like to centralize all logins into AD which is currently

i have the next question i like to authenticate users only by user ant not by user at domain i'm using pam for authentication the users are stored bij first lette for name then back name J.Hendriks???? so no domain included. bu i want them to login as J.Hendriks at domain? so i kan use the same user for more domains in diverent mail folders b.v. mail_folder= home/%d/%u but now pam is

Hello all. I use dovecot in combination with postfix, postfixadmin for virtual users. Deliver to the mailbox now is done by postfix Now i want to enable quota's and therefor i need dovecot deliver. Can i just switch to dovecot deliver? Or must i first do some prrperations in the mailboxes. regards -- _______________________ *Johan Hendriks* *Schavemaker Transport* Tel: +31 (0)251 229098

Hello all I am trying to get quota working with dict and mysql but i get an error. This is my dovecot.conf file ( relevant part ) i hope ;-) ###################### protocol imap { listen = *:143 imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail outlook-idle netscape-eoh tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_max_line_length = 65536 mail_plugins = quota imap_quota } protocol pop3 { listen = *:110

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4979 Summary: readdir() failure results in remote deletes Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: PPC OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: joe07734@gmail.com

with performance.readdir-ahead on on the volume maked folders on mounts invisible to ls command but it will show files fine it shows folders fine with ls on bricks what am I missing? maybe some settings are incompatible guess over-tuning happened vm1:/t1 /home/t1 glusterfs

Guess it is same as [Gluster-users] A Problem of readdir-optimize http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-January/033170.html but on 3.13

All, A github issue on this (tracking mostly DHT stuff) at: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/117 Slides of the talk on the same topic presented at Vault 2017: https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/Gluster_DirPerf_Vault2017_0.pdf regards, Raghavendra

It would be all good if any of this would work not just on pdf see raddir-ahead issues http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-January/033170.html http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-January/033179.html

Check if fs_ops->readdir is available before calling it. At least PXELINUX doesn't implement it. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt at gmx.de> diff --git a/core/fs/readdir.c b/core/fs/readdir.c index d2b112b..d20fc33 100644 --- a/core/fs/readdir.c +++ b/core/fs/readdir.c @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ struct dirent *readdir(DIR *dir) struct file *dd_dir = (struct file *)dir;

--- daemon/devsparts.c | 8 +++++--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/devsparts.c b/daemon/devsparts.c index b89682c..e9c5e8f 100644 --- a/daemon/devsparts.c +++ b/daemon/devsparts.c @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ foreach_block_device (block_dev_func_t func) int size = 0, alloc = 0; DIR *dir; - struct dirent *d; int err = 0; dir = opendir

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:28:39PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > If "strdup (d->d_name)" fails with "i" > 0, then both "p" and > "ret->guestfs_int_dirent_list_val" are non-null pointers, but the latter > is no more valid (since "p" is the new realloc'ed buffer). Hence, trying > to free both will access to invalid memory.

There's a bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674392) and it's almost a year since it has been reported. Is there any plans/suggestions on its fixing? Didn't find any commits regarding this issue but maybe I'm just blind.

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Sergey Ivanov wrote: > There's a bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674392) and > it's almost a year since it has been reported. Is there any > plans/suggestions on its fixing? Didn't find any commits regarding this > issue but maybe I'm just blind. It's open source, we don't have a guarantee of fixing

I'm using libsmbclient with smbc contexts. If I do an smbc_readdir() of a directory X then I get a bunch of (correct) dirents. I then smbc_rmdir() a subdirectory X/Y, which succeeds. A subsequent smbc_readdir(), using the same smbc context, still gives a dirent for X/Y. I've observed this with libsmbclient from Samba 3.2.4, 3.2.7 and 3.3.0, talking to Samba and Win2K3 servers. Two