similar to: Gluster deamon fails to start

glusterd failed to resolve addresses of the bricks. This could happen either because of glusterd was trying to resolve the address of the brick before the N/W interface was up or a change in the IP? If it's the latter then a point to note is that it's recommended that cluster should be formed using hostname otherwise if the server goes through IP change we have to change the configuration

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 at 17:40, Langley, Robert <Robert.Langley at ventura.org> > wrote: > >> Thank you for your response. There has been no change of IP addresses. >> And I have tried restarting the glusterd service multiple times. >> I am using fully qualified names with a

Thank you for your response. There has been no change of IP addresses. And I have tried restarting the glusterd service multiple times. I am using fully qualified names with a DNS server that has forward and reverse setup. Something I had noticed is that, with oVirt, communication is being attempted over the VM network, rather than storage network. Which is not how the bricks are defined. Not sure

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Langley, Robert <Robert.Langley at ventura.org > wrote: > As far as the peer status (and I now remember seeing this earlier) the > issue appears to be that the host name for gsaov07 is attempting to resolve > over the wrong network for gluster "ent...." and not "stor.local". > So, it may be as simple as removing gsaov07 as a

As far as the peer status (and I now remember seeing this earlier) the issue appears to be that the host name for gsaov07 is attempting to resolve over the wrong network for gluster "ent...." and not "stor.local". So, it may be as simple as removing gsaov07 as a peer, then probing over the correct network. I'll follow up with the Engine log. Sent using OWA for iPhone

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 at 17:40, Langley, Robert <Robert.Langley at ventura.org> wrote: > Thank you for your response. There has been no change of IP addresses. And > I have tried restarting the glusterd service multiple times. > I am using fully qualified names with a DNS server that has forward and > reverse setup. > Something I had noticed is that, with oVirt, communication

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hello, I''m trying to build a replica volume, on two servers. The servers are: blade6 and blade7. (another blade1 in the peer, but with no volumes) The volume seems ok, but I cannot mount it from NFS. Here are some logs: [root@blade6 stor1]# df -h /dev/mapper/gluster_stor1 882G 200M 837G 1% /gluster/stor1 [root@blade7 stor1]# df -h /dev/mapper/gluster_fast

Hello all, Please forgive me if this sounds a little (or a lot) ignorant as I am very new to asterisk. Right now I have two pc's connected back to back through an E100 card running asterisk. I have openh323 running as well and I am able to route calls through the E1 line. Next up I would like to be able to register asterisk with a gatekeeper. On another computer is running openGK. Using

Here's the state of my search: BatteriesPlus is... odd. The corporate site, and after a phone call, tell me they don't do GSA, but some of their franchises do. I called the local one, and they do. However, the only RBC 43 they offer, I might as well buy direct from APC, at well over $300 for the set. Battery Sharks, and Apex, don't do GSA... but they *do* offer replacements for about

Is anyone using the subject phone without the proprietary call setup equipment? How do you configure this phone to use the * pbx? I am hoping to go out and buy a couple of phones but the dealer here says I need to spend another $15K or so for the call manager equipment. Regards, Sean Langley, P.Eng Firmware Engineer General Dynamics Canada (403)730-1482 sean.langley@gdcanada.com

Dear list, I have gene expression measurements obtained by PCR on 11 genes, tabulated as a data matrix. I'm attempting to use GSA package to distinguish any significant changes in these genes as a pathway. My response variable is binary, 0=no disease, 1=disease. I have read the PCR data into R as follows: data <-

Dear R-helpers, I'm not a speciallist in writing complex functions, and the function still very rusty (any kind of suggestions are very welcome). I want to implement Gale-Shapley algorithm for R Language. It is based on http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2312726 Gale and Shapley (1962) , and it has evolved to