similar to: Web python framework under GlusterFS

Hello, We have a cluster with two nodes, "sg" and "br", which were running GlusterFS 9.1, installed via the Ubuntu package manager. We updated the Ubuntu packages on "sg" to version 9.6, and now have big problems. The "br" node is still on version 9.1. Running "gluster volume status" on either host gives "Error : Request timed out". On

Hi David, It seems like a network issue to me, As it's unable to connect the other node and getting timeout. Few things you can check- * Check the /etc/hosts file on both the servers and make sure it has the correct IP of the other node. * Are you binding gluster on any specific IP, which is changed after your update. * Check if you can access port 24007 from the other host. If

Hello, I guess this has nothing to do with GlusterFS per se however any tips would be greatly appreciated. The issue is that executing 'gluster volume status' under FreeBSD 11.1 results in no data although functionality wise everything is working fine: # gluster volume status Status of volume: gvol0 Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I compiled R 2.3.1 on two SuSE systems. With SuSE 8.2 I got an error which I had not on SuSE 10: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/3.3/../../../../i486-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lRlapack On both system libRlapack.so is made, but the size is verz different: SuSE 8.2: -rwxr-x--- 1 wf sys

R gurus: I'm trying to get another round of rconifers out and I need some advice/help crushing differences in the examples test. I'm trying to make sure the max sdi values are being respected. I've added a tests/rconifers-Ex.Rout.save (from windows i386-pc-mingw32) and when I ran R CMD check (both R-2.13.0), I got the following results: * using log directory

Hi Max, > The Glasgow Haskell Compiler LLVM backend is generating a lot of code which > appears to be optimised by LLVM quite poorly. The problem is demonstrated by > this C source code: if I run this at -O3 under llvm-gcc from top-of-tree on x86-64 linux then (1) it computes that g(5) is equal to 95, and main is transformed to just print 95. (2) g is transformed into code with no

Hello, I am trying to create a plot often seen in hydrodynamic work than includes a contour plot representing the water speed with arrows pointing in the direction of flow. Does anyone have any idea how I might add arrows based on wf$angle (in the example below) to the plot below? Thanks in advance! Sam library(lattice) speed <- runif(100, 0, 20) wf <- data.frame(speed) wf$width <-

Hi, The Glasgow Haskell Compiler LLVM backend is generating a lot of code which appears to be optimised by LLVM quite poorly. The problem is demonstrated by this C source code: int wf(int sp[]) { if (sp[0] == 0) { return sp[2] + sp[3]; } else { sp[3] = sp[3] + (sp[1] * 5); sp[2] = (sp[2] + sp[0]) + 1; sp[1] = sp[1] - 1; sp[0] = sp[0] - 1;

Below you will find the output from a failed multi-level model run. I am trying to estimate the following model: Pr(PLFP=1)= logistic regression -> B1_j * bm + B2_j * wm + B3_j bf + B4_j wf + B5 yrsed+ B6 age+ B7 age^2+e_ij B1_j = G01 + G11 bmxd + d1 B2_j = G02 + G12 wmxd + d2 B3_j = G03 + G13 bfxd + d3 B4_j = G04 + G14 wfxd + d4 d1-d4 freely correlated Note that there is no

Hi, I have a dataframe wf existing of a header with different labels and beneath the values of those labels : wf: label1 label2 ... 0,45 0,21 0,10 0,45 .... .... I have a list fl <- c("label2","label3",..) Isn't possible to use the list elements in the list in order to subtract values from the dataframe? like : wf$fl[[1]] When I do in R I get :NULL

Trying to get cpu temps from lm_sensors for a Tyan s4985 motherboard, just installed centos 5.4. Tyan release some lm_sensors conf files and other information which I have done, but I am not getting any cpu temps. I was wondering if anyone out there was running this board and if you have gotten temps working for your cpu, here is my output...Thanks in advance. w83627hf-isa-0c00 Adapter: ISA

With a recent stable FreeBSD freebie.xs4all.nl 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Aug 31 14:17:04 CEST 2003 root@freebie.xs4all.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBIE i386 and a recent mbmon build: xmbmon-203 I'm now getting interesting results: wkb@freebie ~: mbmon Temp.= 255.0, 240.0, 255.0; Rot.= 11250, 270000, 225000 Vcore = 1.52, 3.15; Volt. = 3.20, 5.08, 15.50,

Having done my fresh 5.0 install a couple months ago I'm slowly getting things back in to working condition. Decided last night to try setting up lmsensors. Got it all set up (modules, etc taken care of) and it runs and reports values, but some of 'em a clearly wrong with the default sensors.conf Trying to use the old sensors.conf I used on Centos 4 produces even more whacked-out results,

I am seeing the wf loop get optimized just fine with llvm 2.8 (and almost as good with head). I'm running on Mac OS X 10.6. I have an apple supplied llvm-gcc and a self compiled llvm 2.8. When I run $ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S M.c $ opt -O2 M.s | llvm-dis I see that: 1. Tail recursion has been eliminated from wf 2. The accesses to sp have been promoted to registers 3. The loop has

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "wf" == lartc-request <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl> writes: wf> The ip route how-to describes the following for setting up wf> source routing wf> #echo 501 uras.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables wf> Error: argument "uras.out" is wrong: invalid table ID I''m

<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp<head> &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp<meta charset="UTF-8">

David Peixotto <dmp <at> rice.edu> writes: > I am seeing the wf loop get optimized just fine with llvm 2.8 (and almost as good with head). I rechecked this and am I actually seeing the same results as you. I think I must have made a stupid mistake in my tests before - sorry for the noise. However, I found that we have a phase ordering problem which is preventing us getting as much

Hello, me again. I have a data frame that looks like this (actual dput output at bottom): > head(tencor) date lot wf.id s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 1 08.05.2012 W0X3H0 9 1238 1263 1244 1200 1183 2 08.05.2012 W0X3H0 10 1367 1396 1371 1325 1311 3 08.05.2012 W0X3H0 11 1383 1417 1393 1346 1328 I'd like to add a column to this that gives, for each row, the averages of the

Do you have a bounced email, we can look at for clues? > On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Ok, apple addresses still bounce without a reason - the sendgrid folks say this is completely controlled by apple.com <http://apple.com/>'s mail servers - do you have somebody you can ask? > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM Manuel