similar to: I/O error for one folder within the mountpoint

On 07/07/2017 01:23 PM, Florian Leleu wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > first time on the ML so excuse me if I'm not following well the rules, > I'll improve if I get comments. > > We got one volume "applicatif" on three nodes (2 and 1 arbiter), each > following command was made on node ipvr8.xxx: > > # gluster volume info applicatif > > Volume

Hi Ravi, thanks for your answer, sure there you go: # gluster volume heal applicatif info Brick ipvr7.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick <gfid:e3b5ef36-a635-4e0e-bd97-d204a1f8e7ed> <gfid:f8030467-b7a3-4744-a945-ff0b532e9401> <gfid:def47b0b-b77e-4f0e-a402-b83c0f2d354b> <gfid:46f76502-b1d5-43af-8c42-3d833e86eb44> <gfid:d27a71d2-6d53-413d-b88c-33edea202cc2>

I guess you're right aboug gfid, I got that: [2017-07-07 07:35:15.197003] W [MSGID: 108008] [afr-self-heal-name.c:354:afr_selfheal_name_gfid_mismatch_check] 0-applicatif-replicate-0: GFID mismatch for <gfid:3fa785b5-4242-4816-a452-97da1a5e45c6>/snooper b9222041-72dd-43a3-b0ab-4169dbd9a87f on applicatif-client-1 and 60056f98-20f8-4949-a4ae-81cc1a139147 on applicatif-client-0 Can you

What does the mount log say when you get the EIO error on snooper? Check if there is a gfid mismatch on snooper directory or the files under it for all 3 bricks. In any case the mount log or the glustershd.log of the 3 nodes for the gfids you listed below should give you some idea on why the files aren't healed. Thanks. On 07/07/2017 03:10 PM, Florian Leleu wrote: > > Hi Ravi, >

On 07/07/2017 03:39 PM, Florian Leleu wrote: > > I guess you're right aboug gfid, I got that: > > [2017-07-07 07:35:15.197003] W [MSGID: 108008] > [afr-self-heal-name.c:354:afr_selfheal_name_gfid_mismatch_check] > 0-applicatif-replicate-0: GFID mismatch for > <gfid:3fa785b5-4242-4816-a452-97da1a5e45c6>/snooper > b9222041-72dd-43a3-b0ab-4169dbd9a87f on

I''m try to insert a snooping/modifying application in a network without changing the network. That is, I want to take a linux box with two ethernet ports and put it between two existing systems without changing the original IPs. So, I want to change (for example) this: host(192.168.253.1) | | target(192.168.253.2) to: host(192.168.253.1) | |

Hello R gurus, I just spent my first weekend wrestling with R, but so far have come up empty handed. I have a dataset that represents file downloads; it has 4 dimensions: date, filename, email, and country. (sample data below) My first goal is to get an idea of the frequency of repeated downloads. Let me explain that. Some people tend to download multiple times, e.g. if the download fails

Hello, Although I've been using samba for years at my customers office, I recently moved one on a HP E60 server running RedHat 6.2. The samba version is 2.0.6, untouched from the distribution. They use a (weird) accounting software built on the top of FoxPro, requiring a *huge* amount of open files. I accordingly raised the values for files-nr and inode-nr and the stats seem ok. They have

Here''s a neat trick for a machine running kerneld: not_root@machine$ /sbin/ifconfig isofs loads ''/lib/modules/(kernel version here)/fs/isofs.o''. /sbin/ifconfig when run as non-root queries a network interface for its configuration. However, if the interface is unknown it also tries to load the module that implements that interface using the name of the interface as

hi, as far as i have seen rsyncd only support plain passwords on .secrets file. there is any trick/patch to let it support other htpasswd encrytion methods? crypt,md5,sha1? Thanks in advance, Alejandro Mery

Today October 28, they are giving their software for free. Yes. Interest is go great they had to take their main site offline! Downloads can be done from the subsitute web page. So ... is their's really better than Wine on Debian Sid or Experimental? I have no need for MS-office. OO is more than good enought. However ... the question remains :-) They also offer a games package.

Hi, I'm not trying to rock any boats or make noise and I'm not interested in discussing politics either, but I just wanted to get a general feel for what the rest of the tinc community felt in regards to how the EU looks like it wants to completely break encryption and make tools like tinc unfeasible. Both Germany and France want this to happen and in the UK the snoopers charter has

Hello, I m working towards backend. Here i need to define vector load and stores for 64 i32 elements. so in x86instrinfo.td i wrote; def VMOV_256B_RM : I<0x6F, MRMSrcMem, (outs VR2048:$dst), (ins i32mem:$src), "vmov_256B_rm\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", [(set VR2048:$dst, (v64i32 (scalar_to_vector (loadi32 addr:$src))))],

Did anything special happen on these two bricks? It can't happen in the I/O path: posix_removexattr() has: 0 if (!strcmp (GFID_XATTR_KEY, name)) { 1 gf_msg (this->name, GF_LOG_WARNING, 0, P_MSG_XATTR_NOT_REMOVED, 2 "Remove xattr called on gfid for file %s", real_path); 3 op_ret = -1; 4 goto

GlusterFS WORM hard links will not be created OS is CentOS7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170707/aaea8dfc/attachment.html>

Hi, I was wondering what would be the best way to lower a select operation two predicated movs. I looked through the ARM, MIPS, and NVPTX backends and they all seem to lower a select to some sort of conditional move or native select operation. Ex. select t3, cond, t2, t1 Becomes cond mov t3, t2 !cond mov t3, t1 -Dilan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi, ​ The link ​ ​ on the Github pa ge (https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm) to LLVM git ​ ​ redirects to 404 page. Can someone please fix it? https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm Thanks, Mahdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170707/304e5323/attachment.html>

Ohh, that makes sense. And is the reason the first instruction doesn't get deleted because the ExpandPseudoInstructions pass occurs after Register Allocation and machine dead code elimination? -Dilan On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:37 PM Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 7/7/2017 12:10 PM, Dilan Manatunga wrote: > > My bad for not looking further. I'm still

My bad for not looking further. I'm still somewhat confused though. MOVCCr gets expanded in the ARMExpandPseudoInsts pass, and it still seems only a case of one instruction replacing the other. My worry of emitting two instructions, is that a dead code pass will eliminate the first instruction cause it thinks the second instruction is defining the same register. -Dilan On Fri, Jul 7, 2017

Hi, We faced an issue in the production today. We had to stop the volume and reboot all the servers in the cluster. Once the servers rebooted starting of the volume failed because the following extended attributes were not present on all the bricks on 2 servers. 1) trusted.gfid 2) trusted.glusterfs.volume-id We had to manually set these extended attributes to start the volume.