similar to: throughput question

I have setup a distributed glusterfs volume with 3 servers. the network is 1GbE, i get filebench test with a client. refer to this link: https://s3.amazonaws.com/aws001/guided_trek/Performance_in_a_Gluster_Systemv6F.pdf the more server for gluster, more throughput should gain. I have tested the network, the bandwidth is 117 MB/s, so when i have 3 servers i should gain about 300 MB/s (3*117

I got 1920x1200 at 59.95Hz via DVI and 3840x2160 at 60.00Hz via HDMI at the same time with the proprietary nvidia driver. I get flickering on the 1920x1200 at 59.95 with the nouveau driver (it doesn't flicker if I lower it to 1920x1080 at 59.96). Any idea why? proprietary: $ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 5760 x 2160, maximum 32767 x 32767 DVI-D-0 connected primary 1920x1200+0+0

Buenas noches estimados colegas: Adjunto la matriz,de la que quiero obtener, los promedios de cada elemento de los vectores que la componen. Me explico, el primer vector, tiene como primer elemento 23 y la suma de todos los elementos es 134; por lo tanto el promedio será 0.1716, el segundo elemento de dicho vector es 20, entonces el promedio sería 0.1492, del tercero el promedio es 0.1343 y así

Hi, we are having a problem with NFS using RDMA protocol over our FDR10 Infiniband network. I previously wrote to NFS mailing list about this, so you may find our discussion there. I have taken some load off the server which was using NFS for backups, and converted it to use SSH, but we are still having critical problems with NFS clients losing connection to the server, causing the clients

I have a system that I'm vetting as a NAS server. It has a 2.0TB XFS filesystem mounted on /storage and I'm doing benchmarks using nfs3, nfs4, and samba. I'm testing via iozone by mounting the filesystem from my "nas client" box and then running iozone on the mounted filesystem. NFS seems pretty fast - ie, several orders of magnitude faster than samba, and I'm

Hello, I have an Intel NUC7PJYH running CentOS 6.8. This is a NUC with standard USB, 1GbE and 2*HDMI. Installation was no problem providing acpi=off. The problem is that by default the two displays are mirrored and I can?t seem to separate them. I can only see one HDMI port from CentOS. I need to see both HDMI ports discreetly. Can you please help. Regards, Mark Woolfson MW Consultancy Ltd

To continue this topic: sometimes SCEV's behavior is rather controversial : for loops with i changing as i \=2 for example, he can't figure what the type of expressions is, but surprisingly can determine max trip count. Shouldn't it be able to detect or not detect these parameters at the same time? 2017-08-11 15:56 GMT+02:00 Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya < anastasiya.ruzhanskaya at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167 Bug ID: 1167 Summary: Hacked By KingSkrupellos Cyberizm.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Product: bugzilla Version: other Hardware: sparc64 OS: RedFlag Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

Hi John, why not try something newer than CentOS 6.8 ? Maybe not the latest 8.1 but 7.7 is quite recent and stable. Your (integrated) video card is : Intel? HD Graphics 605 (NUC7PJYH) Intel NUC7PJYH seems to be able to pilot Dual 4K display : " ...The NUC7PJYH kit also comes with dual Ultra HD 4K display support via two full-sized HDMI* ports, consumer infrared, and a TOSLINK audio jack,

(adding virtualization mailing list) On Thursday 19 May 2011, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 5/19/2011 9:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> /proc/tile/hvconfig > >> Detailed configuration description of the hypervisor config > > I'm concerned about moving this one out of /proc, since it's just (copious) > free text. An "hvconfig" (hypervisor config)

(adding virtualization mailing list) On Thursday 19 May 2011, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 5/19/2011 9:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> /proc/tile/hvconfig > >> Detailed configuration description of the hypervisor config > > I'm concerned about moving this one out of /proc, since it's just (copious) > free text. An "hvconfig" (hypervisor config)

Looking at the project site the latest Windows Binary is a few back - 2.6.5.6 Has any one built a more recent version that they can upload and update the Project site ? Looking for Windows 7 / Windows 8, not running Windows 10 on any of my tool Laptops and I need to check some battery packs and overall status on a series of UPS units in shelters, The build 2.6.5.6 gives my grirf in a number of

Hi every one, I am using the package 'drc' to model root elongation using dose response data. I don't know which model I should use. Though I don't know which model I should use, I tried the following codes given below. But it produced the error messages.Can any one tell me the code in 'drc' package to find out the EC (Effective Concentration) values and Confidence

Exactly what it says in the subject really. Looking for a way to prioritise the netlogon requests on the network above the file share transfers. We have a few desktops that are used for design files and are connected by 1Gbe along with a fleet of WiFi (802.11g generally) enabled laptops. Trying to logon while the desktops are transferring large files can cause some nasty issues. Thinking about

hi all, after i upgraded a physical server (SUN FIRE X4170) from CentOS 6.8 to 7.2 i am not able to get the same iSCSI read performance. the server is connected to HP P2000 Storage via 2 x 1GbE Ethernet. CentOS 6.8 gives me full read performance on raw iSCSI devices /dev/sdxx at 115MB/s. CentOS 7.2 allows only 90-100MB/s, read performance varies and is not stable like for 6.8 the multipath

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:53 AM Mark (Netbook) <mrw at mwcltd.co.uk> wrote: > I have an Intel NUC7PJYH running CentOS 6.8. This is a NUC with standard > USB, 1GbE and 2*HDMI. FWIW, that has a Pentium Silver J2005, which has Intel? UHD Graphics 605 thats fairly new stuff, and centos 6 is pretty old now. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102192 Bug ID: 102192 Summary: Dell XPS 15 9560: PU: 1 PID: 58 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/gf100.c:190 gf100_vm_flush+0x1b3/0x1c0 [nouveau] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All)

Hello Folks, Very new to R so bear with me, running 5.2 on XP. Trying to do a zero-inflated negative binomial regression on placental scar data as dependent. Lactation, location, number of tick larvae present and mass of mouse are independents. Dataframe and attributes below: Location Lac Scars Lar Mass Lacfac 1 Tullychurry 0 0 15 13.87 0 2 Somerset 0 0 0

I'm seeing some really poor performance out of my FreeNAS (ver 9.10) machine, running Samba "4.3.6-GIT-UNKNOWN". I'm using IOMeter to benchmark sequential reads, and getting around 35-40 MB/sec, which seems unusual. Mostly, I'm hoping someone can point me in the direction of a decent tuning guide for a SOHO machine running Samba, but if you're inclined, I'll delve

Instrumentation based Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) is a compiler technique that leverages important program runtime information, such as precise edge counts and frequent value information, to make frequently executed code run faster. It's proven to be one of the most effective ways to improve program performance. An important design point of PGO is to decide where to place the