similar to: using randomForest() with matrix() as input results to an Error: protect(): protection stack overflow

Dear Researches, I am using RF (in regression way) for analize several metrics extract from image. I am tuning RF setting a loop using different range of mtry, tree and nodesize using the lower value of MSE-OOB mtry from 1 to 5 nodesize from1 to 10 tree from 1 to 500 using this paper as refery Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007). Random Forest Models

Hi, I would like to use a random Forest model to get an idea about which variables from a dataset may have some prognostic significance in a smallish study. The default for the number of trees seems to be 500. I tried changing the default to ntree=2000 or ntree=200 and the results appear identical. Have changed mtry from mtry=5 to mtry=6 successfully. Have seen same problem on both a Windows

When mtry is equal to total number of features, you just get regular bagging (in the R package -- Breiman & Cutler's Fortran code samples variable with replacement, so you can't do bagging with that). There are cases when bagging will do better than random feature selection (i.e., RF), even in simulated data, but I'd say not very often. HTH, Andy From: Arne.Muller at

The `1' and `2' columns are the error rates within those classes. E.g., the last row of the `1' column should correspond to the class.error for "-", and the last row of the `2' column to the class.error for "+". (I would have thought that that should be fairly obvious, but I guess not. It mimics what Breiman and Cutler's Fortran code does.) I suspect

Dear R-users, While making a prediction using the randomForest function (package randomForest) I'm getting the following error message: "Error in predict.randomForest(model, newdata = CV) : No forest component in the object" Here's my complete code. For reproducing this task, please find my 2 data sets attached ( http://www.nabble.com/file/p17855119/data.rar data.rar ).

Dear list, I am trying to do a benchmark study for my case study. It is a regression problem. Among other models I use randomForest. Using the following code the result is around 0.628, and this make sense comparing with other methods. The Theil function implements Theil's U statistic. I do not present the definition of some variables because it is not important to understand my problem.

Just curious if anyone else has got this error before, and if so, would know what I could do (if anything) to get past it: > mtry <- tuneRF(training, trainingdata$class, ntreeTry = 500, stepFactor = 2, improve = 0.05, trace = TRUE, plot = TRUE, doBest = FALSE) mtry = 13 OOB error = 0.62% Searching left ... mtry = 7 OOB error = 1.38% -1.222222 0.05 Searching right ... mtry = 26

Dear All, For a data mining project, I am relying heavily on the RandomForest and Party packages. Due to the large size of the data set, I have often memory problems (in particular with the Party package; RandomForest seems to use less memory). I really have two questions at this point 1) Please see how I am using the Party and RandomForest packages. Any comment is welcome and useful.

Dear R users, I've just released a new version of randomForest (available on CRAN now). This version contained quite a number of new features and bug fixes, compared to version prior to 4.0-x (and few more since 4.0-1). For those not familiar with randomForest, it's an ensemble classifier/regression tool. Please see http://www.math.usu.edu/~adele/forests/ for more detailed information,

Dear R users, I've just released a new version of randomForest (available on CRAN now). This version contained quite a number of new features and bug fixes, compared to version prior to 4.0-x (and few more since 4.0-1). For those not familiar with randomForest, it's an ensemble classifier/regression tool. Please see http://www.math.usu.edu/~adele/forests/ for more detailed information,

Dear R-users, I have a problem with randomForest{outlier}. After running the following code ( that produces a silly data set and builds a model with randomForest ): ####################### library(randomForest) set.seed(0) ## build data set X <- rbind( matrix( runif(n=400,min=-1,max=1), ncol = 10 ) , rep(1,times= 10 ) ) Y <- matrix( nrow = nrow(X), ncol = 1) for( i in (1:nrow(X))){

hello, I want to use randomForest to classify a matrix which is 331030?42,the last column is class signal.I use ? Memebers.rf<-randomForest(class~.,data=Memebers,proximity=TRUE,mtry=6,ntree=200) which told me" the error is matrix(0,n,n) set too elements" then I use: Memebers.rf<-randomForest(class~.,data=Memebers,importance=TRUE,proximity=TRUE) which told me"the error is

I used the following command to train a randomForest model train.rf <- randomForest(grp ~ ., data=tr, ntree=100, mtry=50) My question is how to save the trained model so that it can be loaded later for testing new samples? Thanks, Luk --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I'm trying to find out the optimal number of splits (mtry parameter) for a randomForest classification. The classification is binary and there are 32 explanatory variables (mostly factors with each up to 4 levels but also some numeric variables) and 575 cases. I've seen that although there are only 32 explanatory variables the best classification performance is reached when

Lately R has been behaving strange on my Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) machine, with occasional segfaults. Today something else and reproducible happened: If I type the code below (meant for calibrating data), I get the error message that "the C stack usage is too close to the limit". calcurve <- cbind(1:2e4, 1:2e4, 1:2e3); #dummy curve, real one is more complex caldist <-

I'm attempting to pass a string argument into the function randomForest but I get an error: state <- paste(list("fruit ~", "apples+oranges+blueberries", "data=fruits.data, mtry=2, do.trace=100, na.action=na.omit, keep.forest=TRUE"), sep= " ", collapse="") model.rf <- randomForest(state) Error in if (n==0) stop ("data(x) has 0

Here is a snippet to show what i'm trying to do. library(randomForest) library(ROCR) library(caret) data(iris) iris <- iris[(iris$Species != "setosa"),] fit <- randomForest(factor(Species) ~ ., data=iris, ntree=50) train.predict <- predict(fit,iris,type="prob")[,2]

The link from http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES.html#randomForest seems to be broken. To get the file try http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/randomForest_3.3-4.tar.gz instead. > -----Original Message----- > From: Liaw, Andy [mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:08 PM > To: 'r-announce at stat.math.ethz.ch' > Subject:

Hi, There is an excellent article at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/307 by Stroble, et al. describing variable importance in random forests. Does anyone have any suggestions (besides imputation or removal of cases) for how to deal with data that *have* missing data for predictor variables? Below is an excerpt of some code referenced in the article. I have commented out one line and

I received this error Error in randomForest.default(m, y, ...) : Can not handle categorical predictors with more than 32 categories. using below code library(randomForest) library(MASS) memory.limit(size=12999) x <- read.csv("D:/train_store_title_view.csv", header=TRUE) x <- na.omit(x) set.seed(131) sales.rf <- randomForest(sales ~ ., data=x, mtry=3, importance=TRUE) My