Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "How to install packages from GitHubb"
2017 May 18
0
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 14:51, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 13:47 , Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not recalculated whereas POSIXct is. Reason for that is the different way values are stored (hours, minutes, seconds as opposed to minutes
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 14:58 , Martyn Plummer <plummerM at iarc.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 14:51, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 18 May 2017, at 13:47 , Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not recalculated
2018 Feb 02
0
Updating Rcpp package when it is claimed by dplyr
On Fri, 02-Feb-2018 at 10:25AM +0100, peter dalgaard wrote:
|> Or, to avoid accusing you of lying. what you think is "vanilla"
|> probably isn't. What exactly did you do? On Unix-likes, I would do
|> something like this
|> echo 'options(repos=list(CRAN="cran.r-project.org"));install.packages("Rcpp")' | R --vanilla
|>
|> (or maybe
2018 Feb 14
2
Using gutenbergr with a firewall
I can use the gutenberg_download() function in the gutenbergr package
on a computer that doeson't use a firewall, but on an almost identical
installation that is behind a firewall, nothing happens, not even a
time-out.
Has anyone succeeded in using gutenberg_download() successfully with a
firewall? I tried raising an issue at
https://github.com/ropenscilabs/gutenbergr/issues/17 with no
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 13:47 , Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not recalculated whereas POSIXct is. Reason for that is the different way values are stored (hours, minutes, seconds as opposed to minutes from origin, as explained in my previous mail)
>
I would suspect that there is something more subtle
2018 Feb 02
0
Updating Rcpp package when it is claimed by dplyr
Your last statement is extremely unlikely to be true. The dplyr package should not be present in a vanilla environment, so there should be no such conflict.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On February 1, 2018 11:00:01 PM PST, Patrick Connolly <p_connolly at slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>When i tried to install the hunspell package, I got this error
>message:
>
2011 Nov 21
1
Comments disappearing from local functions (R 2.14.0)
I've installed R-2.14.0 from source on CentOS and on Kubuntu and in
both cases, I see something I've never seen before. Comments in
locally written functions disappear. I put comments there for a
purpose and I'd like to keep them. I can still use older versions of
R without that happening. Nothing I noticed in the NEWS file seems to
indicate a change that could be related to that
2017 May 18
0
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 11:00 , Patrick Connolly <p_connolly at slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17-May-2017 at 01:21PM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>
> |>
> |> Anyways, you might want to
> |>
> |> a) move the discussion to R-devel
> |> b) include your platform (hardware, OS) and time zone info
>
> System: Host: MTA-V1-427894 Kernel:
2017 May 19
1
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
On Thu, 18-May-2017 at 05:46PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
|>
.....
|>
|> Being pretty "stretched" time wise currently, I'm happy for
|> timezone-portable propositions to change the test.
Meantime, anyone who lives where DST happpens in December who wants to
get through the remaining tests can avoid this one by changing the line
> stopifnot(length(fd) == 10,
2018 Feb 02
2
Updating Rcpp package when it is claimed by dplyr
Or, to avoid accusing you of lying. what you think is "vanilla" probably isn't. What exactly did you do? On Unix-likes, I would do something like this
echo 'options(repos=list(CRAN="cran.r-project.org"));install.packages("Rcpp")' | R --vanilla
(or maybe https://cloud.r-project.org is better...)
-pd
> On 2 Feb 2018, at 08:15 , Jeff Newmiller
2018 Feb 02
2
Updating Rcpp package when it is claimed by dplyr
When i tried to install the hunspell package, I got this error message:
Error: package ?Rcpp? 0.12.3 was found, but >= 0.12.12 is required by ?hunspell?
So I set about installing a new version of Rcpp but I get this message:
Error in unloadNamespace(pkg_name) :
namespace ?Rcpp? is imported by ?dplyr? so cannot be unloaded
How does one get around that? I tried installing Rcpp in a
2013 Jan 22
4
Simple use of dcast (reshape2 package)
Suppose I have a small dataframe
> aa
Target Eaten ID
50 TPP 0 1
51 TPP 1 2
52 TPP 3 3
53 TPP 1 4
54 TPP 2 5
50.1 GPA 9 1
51.1 GPA 11 2
52.1 GPA 8 3
53.1 GPA 8 4
54.1 GPA 10 5
And I want to reshape it into
ID TPP GPA
1 1 0 9
2 2 1 11
3 3 3 8
4 4 1 8
5 5 2 10
I realise that
2017 May 18
0
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not
recalculated whereas POSIXct is. Reason for that is the different way
values are stored (hours, minutes, seconds as opposed to minutes from
origin, as explained in my previous mail)
CHeers
Joris
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote:
> This has to do with your own timezone. If I run
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
On Wed, 17-May-2017 at 01:21PM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
|>
|> Anyways, you might want to
|>
|> a) move the discussion to R-devel
|> b) include your platform (hardware, OS) and time zone info
System: Host: MTA-V1-427894 Kernel: 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 4.8.2)
Desktop: KDE Plasma 4.14.2 (Qt 4.8.6) Distro: Linux Mint 17.3 Rosa
Machine: System:
2016 Apr 13
0
R 3.2.4-revised is released
My CRAN mirror still says this:
The latest release (Thursday 2016-03-10, Very Secure Dishes)
R-3.2.4.tar.gz, read what's new in the latest version.
Should that not be updated? Anyone who has not seen that post won't
know to look further.
On Wed, 16-Mar-2016 at 08:39PM +0000, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
|> The 3.2.4 release had two annoyances which we would rather not have
|> in
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
This has to do with your own timezone. If I run that code on my computer,
both formats are correct. If I do this after
Sys.setenv(TZ = "UTC")
Then:
> cbind(format(dlt), format(dct))
[,1] [,2]
[1,] "2016-12-06 21:45:41" "2016-12-06 20:45:41"
[2,] "2016-12-06 21:45:42" "2016-12-06 20:45:42"
The reason for that, is that
2005 Mar 10
1
contrast matrix for aov
How do we specify a contrast interaction matrix for an ANOVA model?
We have a two-factor, repeated measures design, with
Cue Direction (2) x Brain Hemisphere(2)
Each of these has 2 levels, 'left' and 'right', so it's a simple 2x2 design
matrix. We have 8 subjects in each cell (a balanced design) and we want to
specify the interaction contrast so that:
CueLeft>CueRght
2003 Dec 17
1
repeated measures aov problem
Hi all,
I have a strange problem and rigth now I can't figure out a
solution.
Trying to calculate an ANOVA with one between subject factor (group)
and one within (hemisphere). My dependent variable is source
localization (data). My N = 25.
My data.frame looks like this:
> ML.dist.stack
subj group hemisphere data
1 1 tin left 0.7460840
2 2 tin left
2006 Feb 08
1
ERROR: no applicable method for "TukeyHSD"
Why do I see this error?
> library(stats)
> require(stats)
[1] TRUE
>
> tHSD <- TukeyHSD(aov)
Error in TukeyHSD(aov) : no applicable method for "TukeyHSD"
In case it helps:
> aov
Call:
aov(formula = roi ~ (Cue * Hemisphere) + Error(Subject/(Cue *
Hemisphere)), data = roiDataframe)
Grand Mean: 8.195069
Stratum 1: Subject
Terms:
Residuals
Sum
2017 Dec 14
0
Distributions for gbm models
On page 409 of "Applied Predictive Modeling" by Max Kuhn, it states
that the gbm function can accomodate only two class problems when
referring to the distribution parameter.
>From gbm help re: the distribution parameter:
Currently available options are "gaussian" (squared error),
"laplace" (absolute loss), "tdist" (t-distribution