similar to: Yield-to-Maturity problem

This list has a no homework policy. Also, please read the posting guidebelow to learn what sorts of posts are legitimate and how to post. Note: plain text , not html, which often gets mangked by the server. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom

This isn't all that likely to be homework, Bert.... However, Alexander, you may find that not many readers are familiar with YTM concepts. There's a chapter with R examples in Ruppert+Matteson's book (if you have SpringerLink, you may be able to download for free). Otherwise you could try searching CRAN, but be warned that you may get considerably more than you wished for. Some

Dear R helpers   I am calculating the 'Yield to Maturity' for the Bond with following characteristics.   Its a $1000 face value, 3 year bond with 10% annual coupon and is priced at 101. The yield to maturity can be calculated after solving the equation -   1010 = [100 / (1+ytm)]  + [100 / (1+ytm)^2] + [ 1100 / (1 + ytm)^3]   This can be solved by trial and error method s.t. ytm = 9.601%.

Dear R helpers,     Yesterday I had raised following query which was addressed by Mr Ellison. The query and the wonderful solution as provided by Mr. Ellison are as given below.    ## PROBLEM   I am calculating the 'Yield to Maturity' for the Bond with following characteristics.    Its a $1000 face value, 3 year bond with 10% annual coupon and is priced at 101. The yield to maturity can be

Hello. I wonder if someone here performe such large scale tinc-vpn tests.. There are platforms like Imunes or CORE to do generic Ethernet and IP testing and routing, but I found that at least on Imunes it is problematic to start TAP iface on vimage on FreeBSD (at least 4.11 with I use). To fix that, I think about coding in BSD NetGraph support to tinc. But first I need to do testing if actualy

Hi I am giving Solr another try. Using Solr 7.5 (from Archlinux AUR), I do not see anymore the"solr/conf/schema.xml" neither the "managed-schema" folder. (as per https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr) Maybe some things have moved ? Thank you so much -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have a strange problem with my samba domain servers, they do no longer show the domain or local groups. I run three debian sarge machines as samba domain controllers (samba version is 3.0.23c) with an ldap backend in master/slave configuration. getent group shows all the groups, net groupmap list shows all the groups but net rpc info outputs: Domain Name: GOTTINGER Domain SID:

On Jul 26, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:52 PMPDT, Jochen Wilhelmy wrote: >>> Currently we don't do any unsafe-math opts in InstCombine. Not >>> sure if this is policy or if it's just that nobody's implemented it. >>> >> perhaps in can be implemented using the existing flag -enable-unsafe- >> fp-math. >>

Well, "break-imap-search" option prevent dovecot from starting. I used solr on one server since yesterday. First feedback is that * BODY search is not working * FTS is not really working in headers : For instance, if you search "kliinik" but you type "kliini" (missing one k), the search does not return anything , whereas it shall return more results (as the

also, the value "break-imap-search" is not supported in fts_solr parameter, contrary to the wiki and not sure then how to enable full text search in BODY On 2018-12-04 19:40, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote: > In the Wiki, ( https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr ), it would nice to stipulate to the reader to type the command : > > sudo -u solr /opt/solr/bin/solr create

Hi, I am contemplating migrating from maildir to dbox. However, I wonder about the maturity of the dbox code, as it appears to not be widely used. Does anybody have some success stories? My primary driver is to have non-changing file names, and thus smaller backup deltas. Are there other advantages that I should pursue? I read in the wiki that the migration is straightforward, but I did not

Hello, it would be nice to know in the community as it is the maturity of the fourth samba at putting in a production environment. It would be wise to put the Samba 4 in a production environment, or would play the most recommended solution samba + openldap? Att, Victor -- ?Encarada do ponto de vista da juventude, a vida parece um futuro indefinidamente longo, ao passo que, na velhice, ela

Hello, I can definately confirm that it's working. My basic setup is: 1) Samba 4.7.6 AD DC (2 of them), compiled from source, on centos 7 2) Freeradius 3.0.13 + samba 4.6.2 as domain member, packages straight from centos repo. // I  tested also on freeradius 3.0.14 and samba 4.7.x smb.conf on the DC is pretty basic, most important is obviously in [globall]:         ntlm auth =

Paul Melis wrote: > Just checked: yup, there's plenty of assert()'s in the headers, so > -D_DEBUG will keep those alive. > > Interestingly, when configuring with --enable-optimized and > --disable-assertions the resulting compilation calls itself a > "Release-Asserts build" while all asserts are thrown away, hmmm :) Yeah, that's "Release-Asserts"

Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at wxs.nl> writes: > Paul Melis wrote: >> Just checked: yup, there's plenty of assert()'s in the headers, so >> -D_DEBUG will keep those alive. >> >> Interestingly, when configuring with --enable-optimized and >> --disable-assertions the resulting compilation calls itself a >> "Release-Asserts build" while

Hi, > Committed a change for the cmake build that implements the option > LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTS. Defaults to ON if and only if CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is > Release. Thanks! I think it might be nice to make this a bit more consistent with Makefile.config. I'd suggest... - use LLVM_DISABLE_ASSERTIONS instead of LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTS - have it default to OFF (so assertions are enabled) always -

Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> writes: >> Committed a change for the cmake build that implements the option >> LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTS. Defaults to ON if and only if CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is >> Release. > > Thanks! I think it might be nice to make this a bit more consistent > with Makefile.config. I'd suggest... > > - use LLVM_DISABLE_ASSERTIONS instead of

>> Thanks! I think it might be nice to make this a bit more consistent >> with Makefile.config. I'd suggest... >> >> - use LLVM_DISABLE_ASSERTIONS instead of LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTS > > Okay. I meant ...DISABLE... instead of ...ENABLE...! >> I don't think -UNDEBUG has any effect, because NDEBUG won't have been >> defined in the first place >

Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> writes: >>> Thanks! I think it might be nice to make this a bit more consistent >>> with Makefile.config. I'd suggest... >>> >>> - use LLVM_DISABLE_ASSERTIONS instead of LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTS >> >> Okay. > > I meant ...DISABLE... instead of ...ENABLE...! The `configure' script accepts --enable-x

Thanks in advance, Are all of the ARM instruction sets that can be specified with -mattr stable? I'm specifically interested in -mattr=+v5te. I'm attempting to build a cross-compiling llvm-gcc to build for Android. The Android native toolchain builds for ARMv5te. --Robb