similar to: CentOS 4.4 on Thinkpad T30

Trying to boot my Thinkpad T30 with Solaris snv_81 xVM it get the error message This version of Solaris xVM does not support this hardware The output of "echo ::interrupts | mdb -k" while booted without xVM is bash-3.2# echo ::interrupts | mdb -k IRQ Vector IPL(lo/hi) Bus Share ISR(s) 0 0x20 14/14 - 1 cbe_fire 1 0x21 5/5 ISA 1 i8042_intr 3 0x23

I have an IBM-refurbished T30, which has handled Fedora well, up through F18. But it never took to F19. I'm in process of trying to downgrade, but that seems to be a monumental job. I have other computers, including a T43 and a System76 tablet; the T30's chief virtue is that it has a serial port. My GPSs and proprietary software still use the serial port, and none of the various

I have 30 identical Lenovo desktop systems running CentOS 5.1. On one of those systems the clock is running slow (5+ minutes from yesterday to this morning and another minute since this morning) despite the fact that NTP is running on all of them and they all have the exact same /etc/ntp.conf file (I compared the MD5 sums of that file on all the systems). Here is the output of

Hi, all. I'm getting a lot of [Feb 3 13:56:36] WARNING[3721] /usr/src/asterisk/spandsp/agx-ast-addons/app_rxfax.c: Channel T30 DONE < 0. in my log file, and incomplete fax reception. Any idea what might be going on? I've googled a fair bit, but haven't seen anything leap out at me. Thanks, -Ken

I've installed 6.4 on an old T30 ThinkPad, and I'm in the midst of setting it up. I can't seem to get an rpm of Pan for it, nor even to do yum update. Mousing around fedoraproject eventually got me to http:// rpmfusion.org/Configuration/ and from there to downloads for the free, nonfree, and epel packages (along with a caveat that tells you -- *after* you've gotten rpmfusion

Just wondering if anyone else has managed to successfully compile spandsp-0.0.2pre6... I'm assuming it is working for most people, else it probably wouldn't have been released, and/or, other people would have had more to say about it... In any case, these are the errors I am getting while doing a make: if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I -g -O2 -MT

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this >> Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? > yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm And samba-*-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at

I've got a CentOS 6 machine that's slated to go into production providing some web and development-repository services. Part of the environment is gitweb, which works as expected with one glitch: SELinux doesn't allow gitweb.cgi to query sssd to display who owns the repositories. The audit log entries are pretty straightforward, e.g., type=AVC msg=audit(XXXXXXXXXXXX): avc:

On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I might actually be able to have a workable answer: > > alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs' /usr/bin/df \ -x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \ -x devpts -x devtmpfs -x efivarfs -x hugetlbfs -x mqueue \ -x nfsd -x proc -x pstore -x rpc_pipefs -x securityfs \ -x selinuxfs -x sysfs -x tmpfs :-) --

Followups set, hesitantly, to gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general I thought I had posted this to both these groups, but my newsreader doesn't show it in either. I have three Garmin GPSs (an Etrex Vista and two Rino 120s), which I want to use under Fedora 11 Linux with four PCs, and two IBM- reconditioned Thinkpads, T30 & T42. Garmin software suites (Metroguide USA and Topo US 2008)

Hi community, In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and plv8 projects) Thanks

I have installed two 4-port serial cards (http://www.startech.com/ Product/ItemDetail.aspx?productid=PCI4S550&c=US) on a CentOS 4.4 system. The hardware appears to be recognized correctly, as kudzu added 2 entries to /etc/sysconfig/hwconf and lscpi shows both cards (output of lspci -vv for both cards included at the end of this email): # lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation

Hello all! I'm brand new to the mailing list, and I've encountered an issue with the microcode_ctl package version 2.1-16 being installed during the CentOS 7.3 upgrade. It causes my servers to hard stop and they need to be forcibly powered off and back on again with the power button to continue. This RedHat thread https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398698 details the issue,

Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no smart host stuff_). I've got Sendmail 8.14 installed on a CentOS 7.3

On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > > information on this matter, and have found information that is > anywhere from > > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more > up to

hope thus comes under the remit of this mailking list... We use puppet, and Im trying to come up with "code" that will create two user accounts with a shared groiup ID eg? user1 with UID 1000user 2 with UID 1001 but I would like them BOTH to share the GID of 2000 I've tried the following accounts::groups:? ? jointgroup:? ? ? ? gid: '2000' accounts::users: ? ? user1:? ? ? ?

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Alexandru Lazarev wrote: > Hi community, > In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL > repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. > > How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it > (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and > plv8 projects) Do you mean the

For those of you who are either part of the secret cabal, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the cryptex is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.

Hello, does it in any respect (throughput/performance, cpu load, I/O load, resilience, ...) matter, if one mounts subdirectories of an NFS (v3) export into separate directories or if one just mounts the parent directory? I.e. like this: server:/export/base/a -> /mnt/a server:/export/base/b -> /mnt/b server:/export/base/c -> /mnt/c server:/export/base/d -> /mnt/d

Hi, I am user of CentOS 8. When can we expect an image on AWS? I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that. thanks --- Lee