similar to: override with native, builtin

I want to know will builtin dll always call other builtin dll or it depends on winecfg setting just like other dll? Is it reliable that these dll mixed togther? For example, the builtin gdiplus depend on and call ole dll, does the builtin gdiplus designed to work with both builtin and native ole dll? Will there be any incompatibilities, like different memory allocator? regards,

I notice that there are some proxy dll inside system32 eg. comctl32.dll, What is the correct procedure to override it? Is that OK that just to copy my native comctl32.dll to overwrite that dll and then run winecfg to set the override tab? And if that proxy dll was overwritten, how to restore to use built-in version? regards,

hi, running of some application reports the error "fixme:menu:TrackPopupMenuEx not fully implemented". i guess i should copy some native Dll's into the 'windows' directory to fix this error, ain't i right? if so, what Dll i should exactlly copy? and, i also want to know if i hope wine works better, what's the collection of Dlls's you guys often copy native

Yes I know this is stupid, but I do not understand the difference between Native and Builtin, in that Native is the original Windows dll Builtin is the Wine version OK, but what is in the drive_C/windows/system32 folder? are these the Builtin dlls? or are they just stubs needed to fool the programs into thinking that the dll exists? If they are just stubs and I want to use a Native dll for just

I'm studing wine for my thesis but I've an question: if I can use native dll for an application because are there many builtin dll in usr/lib/wine? I understand for system dll like kernel32.dll, user32.dll etc Thanks.

just done git-pull , during compilation, it said make[2]: Entering directory `/home/bill/wine-git/dlls/qedit/tests' ../../../tools/makedep -C. -S../../.. -T../../.. mediadet.c qedit.rc sound_test.avi: No such file or directory sound_test.avi was first included from qedit.rc:25 make[2]: [Makefile] Error 1 (ignored) ../../../tools/makedep -C. -S../../.. -T../../.. mediadet.c qedit.rc

Perhaps the msxml3: Added support for SAXXMLReader causes compilation failure on my ubuntu gutsy amd64 libxml/SAX2.h: No such file or directory libxml/SAX2.h was first included from saxreader.c:41 make[2]: [Makefile] Error 1 (ignored) ../../tools/makedep -C. -S../.. -T../.. -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 attribute.c cdata.c comment.c docfrag.c domdoc.c domimpl.c element.c

Is there a terminal command that can be used in a Bash script that will reset the loading of all DLLs to "builtin, then native" and vice-versa? I've looked at WINEDLLOVERRIDES but the instructions for it do not explain whether wildcards or some "all" like command can be used.

Hi, I want to replace some of the builtin libraries of Wine with native ones to improve performance in some games. The wine documentation refers to a '~/.wine/config' that doesn't exist. From what I've gathered from this mailing list, I should simply move the native dlls I want into the fake c drive (.wine/drive_c/windows) and Wine will use them instead. Is this right or am I

More and more poor clueless users getting to nowhere installing that stuff according to some howtos. Who are writing those? And why are they directing people to install it in the first place? The only person I've found who created that howto everyone links to - Tom Wickline states EXPLICITLY THAT THIS IS FOR TESTING PURPOSES ONLY!!! AND NOT TO BE USED WITH ANY REAL LIFE APPLICATION! Are

the winecfg confused me about DLL overriding. In the 'libraries' tab, if i specified a Dll file name and click 'Add', how does Wine know where to load the native file when need? does it mean i also have to copy the native file into the "c:\windows\system[32]" directory? if so, why i have to bother with the winecfg, why not directlly copy files into the

When I try to load winelib dll I get an error message: "err:module:MODULE_LoadLibraryExA Loading of native DLL <dllname> failed (error 193), check this file." The error message is printed for call: DllHandle = LoadLibrary(DllName); This happens even when I try to load standard Wine dlls, like dlls/msisys.ocx.so Did I miss something obvious? Thanks, Andriy Palamarchuk

I am checking an old bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9637 which happens to affect several games. Before arriving to the bug in question, one has to workaround another bug relate to shdocvw.dll. It is recommended to override a set of libraries which I believe should be put in system32. However, at least some of the dlls are already there. Are these the wine builtins or rather proxies as

I have been trying to get money2003 installed and running under wine. The error: fixme:msi:ACTION_HandleStandardAction unhandled standard action L"RemoveDuplicateFiles" fixme:msi:ACTION_HandleStandardAction unhandled standard action L"RemoveFolders" err:msi:ACTION_InstallFiles compressed file wasn't extracted (L"c:\\Program Files\\Microsoft

I've been trying to get a game running that is sooo close, but just not there, and I see from the Office 2007 thread that other people are pretty much shooting in the dark about which dll overrides are useful for different things too. I was wondering if we could gather the different overrides that work for different apps and put them in one place, maybe make it sticky? Maybe we need one

This just an FYI. Yesterday I updated to top of trunk wine and rebuilt and installed. I have a Ford Service CD (for 1999 models) and wine on the exe does not work (on an old Windows ME laptop it all works). The startup.exe sort of seems to work AFAICT, but when it's done and the app exe started the app exe ( installed on disk) cannot seem to find the cd (the app needs the CD, the install

What really matters is not whether Wine has a Windows drive and filesystem to sit on top of, but whether or not Wine can use native Windows DLLs instead of its builtin ones. Some DLLs in Wine are so perfect that they can be used in Windows - no benefit will be gained from running an app that uses these natively. Some of Wine's DLLs are buggy or incomplete - using stock native Windows ones

Going to install .47 to replace .46. Should I delete ~/.wine and reinstall all my apps, to make sure I catch any possible regression ? Cheers, Ron. -- When you are in it up to your ears, keep your mouth shut. -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org --

I'm runiing wine-20031212 on a dual boot machine. I have both win98 and w2k installed. Other posts have suggested these be copied. Is the the right - complete? -set? advapi32.dll comctl32.dll ddraw.dll gdi32.dll kernel32.dll mfc42.dll msvcrt.dll ole32.dll rpcrt4.dll shell32.dll shlwapi.dll user32.dll sean

Hi, I know wine looks into c:\windows\system and in the current dir '.' for native dlls. What is the order? system dir ou current dir first? is there another place it looks for it? The reason is that I want to move dlls that some apps uses (like mfc) to the applications dir and avoid dll versioning problems. However it would be usesless if wine checks c:\windows\system first for it