similar to: Another way to count TRUE

To get the number of TRUE in logical vector 'x', tabulate(x, 1) can be used. Actually, it gives count of 1, but TRUE as integer is 1. Since R 3.4.0, it gives a correct answer, too, when the count is 2^31 or more.

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <suharto_anggono at yahoo.com> >>>>> on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:51:11 +0000 writes: > By "an argument named 'use.names' is included for concatenation", I meant something like this, that someone might try. >> c(as.Date("2016-01-01"), use.names=FALSE) > use.names >

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono >>>>> on Thu, 30 May 2019 14:45:22 +0000 writes: >>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono >>>>> on Thu, 30 May 2019 14:45:22 +0000 writes: > Here is a patch to function 'stopifnot' that adds 'evaluated' argument and makes 'exprs' argument in 'stopifnot'

useNA <- if (missing(useNA) && !missing(exclude) && !(NA %in% exclude)) "ifany" An example where it change 'table' result for non-factor input, from https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2005-April/069053.html : x <- c(1,2,3,3,NA) table(as.integer(x), exclude=NaN) I bring the example up, in case that the change in result is not intended.

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Thu, 18 May 2017 16:27:09 +0000 writes: >> From an example in >> http://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV.BennoSueselbeck/s-html/helpfiles/nargs.html >> , number of arguments in '...' can be obtained by > (function(...)nargs())(...) .

I am trying once again. By just changing f <- match(xlevs[f], nlevs) to f <- match(xlevs, nlevs)[f] , function 'factor' in R devel could be made more consistent and back-compatible. Why not picking it? -------------------------------------------- On Sat, 25/11/17, Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <suharto_anggono at yahoo.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [Rd] Function

Removal of ans[nas] <- NA from the code of function 'ifelse' in R is not committed (yet). Why? -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 28/11/16, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: Subject: Re: [Rd] ifelse() woes ... can we agree on a ifelse2() ? Cc: R-devel at r-project.org, maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch Date: Monday, 28 November, 2016, 10:00

While you are fiddling with stopifnot(), please consider changing the form of the error thrown so that it includes the caller's call. The change would be from something like stop( <<the message>> ) to stop(simpleError( <<the message>>, sys.call(-1))) For the following code f <- function(x, y) { stopifnot(x > y) x - y } g <- function(x,

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono >>>>> on Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:29:20 +0000 writes: > Another possible shortcut definition: > assert <- function(exprs) > do.call("stopifnot", list(exprs = substitute(exprs), local = parent.frame())) Thank you. I think this is mostly a matter of taste, but I liked your version using eval()

Yes, they work now. I mentioned them partly because the commit description said overflow for large n and partly to be considered for regression tests. -------------------------------------------- On Sat, 19/8/17, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c Cc: r-devel at r-project.org Date: Saturday, 19 August, 2017,

In R devel r72789, the added part in 'factor' documentation (factor.Rd) is the following. Undocumentedly for a long time, \code{factor(x)} loses all \code{\link{attributes}(x)} but \code{"names"}, and resets \code{"levels"} and \code{"class"}. In the code of function 'factor', names(x) is copied to the result. As I mentioned before, names(x) is _not_

>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:07:43 +0200 writes: >>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <suharto_anggono at yahoo.com> >>>>> on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 03:42:08 +0000 writes: >> useNA <- if (missing(useNA) && !missing(exclude) && !(NA %in%

By "an argument named 'use.names' is included for concatenation", I meant something like this, that someone might try. > c(as.Date("2016-01-01"), use.names=FALSE) use.names "2016-01-01" "1970-01-01" See, 'use.names' is in the output. That's precisely because 'c.Date' doesn't have 'use.names', so

>From an example in http://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV.BennoSueselbeck/s-html/helpfiles/nargs.html , number of arguments in '...' can be obtained by (function(...)nargs())(...) . I now realize that sys.call() doesn't expand '...' when the function is called with '...'. It just returns the call as is. If 'stopifnot' uses sys.call() instead of match.call() , the

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <suharto_anggono at yahoo.com> >>>>> on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 03:42:08 +0000 writes: > useNA <- if (missing(useNA) && !missing(exclude) && !(NA %in% exclude)) "ifany" > An example where it change 'table' result for non-factor input, from

> On 16 May 2017, at 18:37 , Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote: > > switch(i, ...) > extracts 'i'-th argument in '...'. It is like > eval(as.name(paste0("..", i))) . Hey, that's pretty neat! -pd > > Just mentioning other things: > - For 'n', > n <- nargs() > can be used.

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:19:49 +0000 writes: > I stand corrected. The part "If set to 'NULL', it implies > 'useNA="always"'." is even in the documentation in R > 2.8.0. It was my fault not to check carefully. I wonder,

I am raising this again. As as.character(list(c(one = "1"))) is still "1" in R 3.5.0 alpha, could as.character(list(c(one = 1))) be "1" , too, as before? The case here is the list component is atomic with length 1. -------------------------------------------- On Sat, 16/12/17, Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <suharto_anggono at yahoo.com> wrote: Subject:

Another possible shortcut definition: assert <- function(exprs) do.call("stopifnot", list(exprs = substitute(exprs), local = parent.frame())) After thinking again, I propose to use ??? ? ? stop(simpleError(msg, call = if(p <- sys.parent()) sys.call(p))) - It seems that the call is the call of the frame where stopifnot(...) is evaluated. Because that is the correct context, I

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:11:06 +0000 writes: >>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:11:06 +0000 writes: > See