similar to: DataControl and DCARContControl functions

A new version, 0.65-1, of glmmML is now on CRAN. It is a major rewrite of the inner structures, so frequent updates (bug fixes) may be expected for some time. News: * The Laplace and adaptive Gauss-Hermite approximations to the log likelihood function are fully implemented. The Laplace method is made the default. It should give results you can compare to the results from 'lmer' (for the

A new version, 0.65-1, of glmmML is now on CRAN. It is a major rewrite of the inner structures, so frequent updates (bug fixes) may be expected for some time. News: * The Laplace and adaptive Gauss-Hermite approximations to the log likelihood function are fully implemented. The Laplace method is made the default. It should give results you can compare to the results from 'lmer' (for the

Hi, A. In a nutshell: The training error, obtained as "error (ret)", from the return value of a ksvm () call for a eps-svr model is (likely) being computed wrongly. "nu-svr" and "eps-bsvr" suffer from this as well. I am attaching three files: (1) ksvm.R from the the kernlab package, un-edited, (2) ksvm_eps-svr.txt: (for easier reading) containing only eps-svr

This continues the message "data.frame within a function (PR#9294)" that was posted on 2006/10/12. Duncan Murdoch kindly replied. I'm using the current version R 2.4.0, but the same issue exists. Just copy and paste the following code under R, and compare the output of f1() and f2() and the output of f3() and f4(). Does anybody have any idea? Thanks.

Dear All, For function: rmvnorm{mvtnorm} in (library mvtnorm, not splus2R), if I generate 2 bivariate normal samples as follows: > rmvnorm(2,mean=rep(0,2),sigma=diag(2)) [,1] [,2] [1,] 2.0749459 1.4932752 [2,] -0.9886333 0.3832266 Where is the first sample, it is stored in the first row or the first column? Does this function store samples row-wise or column-wise? Thank

Hi, I am trying to do run the following model saved in "C:/bugs/sus.bug" model { for (i in 1:n){ y[i] ~ dpois(lamdba[i]) log(lambda[i]) <- mu+bmale[male[i]]+bschn[schn[i]]+epsilon[i] # epsilon[i] ~ dnorm(0,tau.epsilon) } mu ~ dnorm(0,.0001) bmale ~ dnorm(0,.0001) tau.epsilon <- pow(sigma.epsilon, -2) sigma.epsilon ~ dunif(0,100) for (j in

Dear List: I'm working to construct a very large sparse matrix and have found relief using the SparseM package. I have encountered an issue that is confusing to me and wonder if anyone may be able to suggest a smarter solution. The matrix I'm creating is a covariance matrix for a larger research problem that is subsequently used in a simulation. Below is the latex form of the matrix if

Dear List, I am trying to estimate a 3 dimensional density through the DPpackage. For example # model sigma <- matrix(c(0.1,0.05,0.05,0.05,0.1,0.05,0.05,0.05,0.1), ncol=3) rnormm<- rmvnorm(n=100, mean=c(5,100,150), sigma=sigma) sigma2 <- matrix(c(10,0.05,0.05,0.05,10,0.05,0.05,0.05,10), ncol=3) rnormm2<- rmvnorm(n=100, mean=c(20,1,110), sigma=sigma) rnormm<-rbind(rnormm,rnormm2)

Do Users of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models Know Whether Their Software Really Works? Lesaffre et. al. (Appl. Statist. (2001) 50, Part3, pp 325-335) analyzed some simple clinical trials data using a logistic random effects model. Several packages and methods MIXOR, SAS NLMIXED were employed. They reported obtaining very different parameter estimates and P

Full_Name: Jörg Polzehl Version: 1.5.1 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (193.175.148.198) When calculating MLE's in a variance component model using constrained optimization, i.e. optim(...,method="L-BFGS-B",...) I observed an inproper behaviour in cases where the likelihood function was evalueted at the constraint. Parameters and value of the function at the constraint

Hi, I am trying to recreate the right graph on page 524 of Gelman's 2006 paper "Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models" in Bayesian Analysis, 3, 515-533. I am only interested, however, in recreating the portion of the graph for the overlain prior density for the half-Cauchy with scale 25 and not the posterior distribution. However, when I try:

> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:05:21 +0100 (CET) > From: Adriane Leal <loparic at student.fsa.ucl.ac.be> > To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: [R] Problems creating a random sample > > Hi! > > I'm supposed to create a random sample bivariate normal variates of size > equal to 250 with mean vector (-1,1) and cov matrix (1,0.95,0.95,1) > > In S

I have question (curiosity) regarding returned values of R's qcauchy () function, for nonexceedance probability (F). It seems the ideal returned range of cauchy distribution should be [-Inf,Inf]. For F=0 > qcauchy(0) [1] -Inf but for F=1 > qcauchy(1) [1] 8.16562e+15 It seems to me that the proper return value should be Inf??? For default (location=0,scale=1) quantile function of

Hi, My R version is 2.4.1 and I installed the the packages MASS and run command library("MASS"), however when I type ?rmvnorm, no help topic found, it worked before. I tried to ype ?rinvgamma from "MCMCpack" which works great. Anybody have idea? I also reinstalled MASS package, but when I try to type rmvnorm(), no functions found. Pat

Hi I'm using R(2.9.0) and gstat package under Windows to plot sample variograms. When I want to fit them, I don't have the possibility to choose Cauchy functions. Under Mathematica for example, we have it and it seems to be the best one to fit the variograms I have I tested the others functions, they can fit but I would,if possible, use the Cauchy one. If anybody knows something about

Hi all, I am using the function COV.WT to estimate the estimators (location and scale) of a bivariate cauchy distribution. My doubt is about the option WT (weight), cause at the R-help shows that the weight is uniform according to the number of observations. But, checking the theory, for example, the mean is given by mean_estimator=mean(u(s)x)/mean(u(s)), where x=my data (bivariate)

I am more than 'a little disappointed' that you expect a detailed explanation of the problems with your 'bug' report, especially as you did not provide any explanation yourself as to your reasoning (nor did you provide any credentials nor references). Note that 1) Your report did not make clear that this was only relevant to prediction intervals, which are not commonly used.

I am trying to make the following Kalman filter equations work and therefore produce their graphs. v_t=y_t - a_t a_t+1=a_t+K_t*v_t F_t=P_t+sigma.squared.epsilon P_t+1=P_t*(1-K_t)+sigma.squared.eta K_t=P_t/F_t Given: a_1=0,P_1=10^7,sigma.squared.epsilon=15099, sigma.squared.eta=1469.1 I have attached my code,which of course doesnt work.It produces NAs for the Fs,Ks and the a. Can somebody tell me

Hi, I want to simulate a data set with similar covariance structure as my observed data, and have calculated a covariance matrix (dimensions 8368*8368). So far I've tried two approaches to simulating data: rmvnorm from the mvtnorm package, and by using the Cholesky decomposition (http://www.cerebralmastication.com/2010/09/cholesk-post-on-correlated-random-normal-generation/). The problem is

This is not an R question but if anyone can help me, it's much appreciated. Suppose I have a series ( stationary ) y_t and a series x_t ( stationary )and x_t has variance sigma^2_x and epsilon is normal (0, sigma^2_epsilon ) and the two series have the relation y_t = Beta*x_t + epsilon My question is if there are particular values that sigma^2_x and sigma^2_epsilon have to take in