similar to: error: contextstack overflow

I've never seen the error mentioned before but see Brian Ripley's post https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2008-March/157341.html. It looks like you are exceeding a limit. We probably should see some sample code and data. Please have a look at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example and/or http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html for

Hello! I written several implementations in R of R?my's algorithm for generating random ordered strictly binary trees on 2n+1 vertices. One implementation involves manufacturing character strings like: "X <- list(0,list(0,0))" for the case n=2. If I perform the following two steps: cmd <- "X <- list(0,list(0,0))" eval(parse(text=cmd)) then X becomes a true

Hi all, I´m an absolute beginner in R programming…I have a really long R-code with many variables. When I run the program I always get an error at the same place called “contextstack overflow”. Does anybody know what to do in this case? Are there so strict limitations in R? If yes, is it possible to handle it? How? Thank you for any help! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

All - I have a number of rows that I am assigning length classes to via l.class<-with(wae, ifelse((Length>=120)&(Length<130),"125", ifelse((Length>=130)&(Length<140),"135", ifelse((Length>=140)&(Length<150),"145", ifelse((Length>=150)&(Length<160),"155",

Dear R-users, Let me ask about the 'stack overflow' error which I got when I used the function 'combinations' in "gtools". The following is what I did: --------- library(gtools) options(expressions=1e5) combinations(500, 3, 1:500) # or combinations(400, 2, 1:400) Error: protect(): stack overflow --------- How can I overcome this error? Is there perhaps any other

See, /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max try to change value from this file to a higher value. It may happen. If it doesn''t help go keep mailing me :). No i didn''t overcome my problem yet. But I''m close. I did what i sad in the first line of my mail and it help for some time. I think htb has some kind of defect when using ds_mark. When I were shaping download only using

Hi LLVM hackers, when switching one of our projects to LLVM we discovered some strange behavior. We tracked the issue down to the following test case: int main() { double v = 0.84711; int r; __asm__("fistl %0": "=m"(r) : "t"(v)); return r; } The (relevant) clang generated asm looks like this: fldt 0.84711 ## InlineAsm Start fistl -4(%ebp) ## InlineAsm End

> > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:12:35 -0700 > From: Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > To: Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net <mailto:peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net>> > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>, John Regehr >

All, I''m creating a palette type UI where the user sees a div on the right of the screen with various items they can drag to the center area. So far, I''m using the drag & drop calls and this works perfectly. I''ve run into a problem now because I gave the div an overflow setting and fixed height so if the palette list gets long it won''t stretch out the page:

Sean, Let me re-phrase a couple words to make it perfectly clear > On Jul 21, 2017, at 6:29 PM, Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > Sean, > > Dan Gohman’s “transform” changes a loop induction variable, but does not change the CFG, > > Hal’s “transform” deletes blocks out of the CFG, fundamentally altering it. > > These are two totally

Sean, Dan Gohman’s “transform” changes a loop induction variable, but does not change the CFG, Hal’s “transform” deletes blocks out of the CFG, fundamentally altering it. These are two totally different transforms. And even the analysis is different, The first is based on an *assumption* of non-UB (actually there is no analysis to perform) the second Is based on a *proof* of existence of UB

Package: xen-3 version: 3.1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debian/build/build-utils_i386/tools/libxc' gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686

I've rolled up R-2.1.1.tar.gz a short while ago. This is a maintenance release containing mainly bugfixes. See the full list of changes below. You can get it from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.1.1.tar.gz (give it some time to arrive there) or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. If you're *really* impatient, www.biostat.ku.dk/~pd/R-release should work

I've rolled up R-2.1.1.tar.gz a short while ago. This is a maintenance release containing mainly bugfixes. See the full list of changes below. You can get it from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.1.1.tar.gz (give it some time to arrive there) or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. If you're *really* impatient, www.biostat.ku.dk/~pd/R-release should work

FYI >Mailing-List: contact vulnwatch-help@vulnwatch.org; run by ezmlm >List-Post: <mailto:vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org> >List-Help: <mailto:vulnwatch-help@vulnwatch.org> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:vulnwatch-unsubscribe@vulnwatch.org> >List-Subscribe: <mailto:vulnwatch-subscribe@vulnwatch.org> >Delivered-To: mailing list vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org

Hi, I installed RSPerl (RSPerl_0.91-2.tar.gz) and after loading the library I get a buffer overflow. below is the output from R and below that the messages during the installation. Its on an AMD opteron system running Fedora Core5 R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18). Thank you very much for your help. Ido > sessionInfo() R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18) x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu locale:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2784 Summary: rsync gives following error: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785 Summary: rsync gives following error: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Did you try replacing the create() with separate malloc() and init() steps. If so, which of the two was causing the problems? BTW, you need a C99 compiler for VAR_ARRAYS to work, although you may be able to use USE_ALLOCA. Jean-Marc On 05/27/2013 08:36 AM, Fezin E T wrote: > Guys, > > Program stack is getting overflowed when I create and destroy encoder > instance continuously for

Hi, Rsync 3.0.5 on both sides. receiver is Open Solaris and sender is Linux. I got a nested directory - relatively depth but still it should work. It fails instead. sending daemon args: --server --sender -vvlWHogDtpre.is --ignore-errors --numeric-ids --inplace . TEST/ receiving incremental file list delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file [...] overflow: xflags=0x7a