similar to: Samba4 PDC keytab creation for NFSv4 not working

Hello, For a while I have been running NUT 2.0.0 just fine with my APC Back-UPS RS 800 using the usbhid interface. I decided to upgrade to 2.0.2, and all went well (upsc and upsd/upsmon seem happy to talk to the UPS), but I am getting a ton of these messages in my syslog: Jul 6 17:12:45 yggdrasil kernel: usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 3, frame# 780 Jul 6 17:12:50 yggdrasil kernel:

Workstation  is member of NT domain, DC is samba 3.6.12. Was running Fedora 22 (samba 4.2.12), domain logins were working fine. Upgraded to Fedora 23 (samba 4.3.11) and domain logins no longer work: "Domain Controller unreachable, using cached credentials instead." Can connect to shares on the DC (e.g., with smbclient) without problem. Upgraded to samba 4.4.5 (from Fedora 24), issue

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- $Id: lpr-vulnerability-0.6-linux,v 1.1 1996/11/22 21:42:46 alex Exp $ Linux Security FAQ Update lpr Vulnerability Thu Nov 21 22:24:12 EST 1996 Copyright (C) 1995,1996 Alexander O. Yuriev (alex@bach.cis.temple.edu) CIS Laboratories

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- $Id: lpr-vulnerability-0.6-linux,v 1.2 1996/11/25 22:39:20 alex Exp $ Linux Security FAQ Update lpr Vulnerability Mon Nov 25 16:56:59 EST 1996 Copyright (C) 1995,1996 Alexander O. Yuriev (alex@bach.cis.temple.edu) CIS Laboratories

Flash does support interactive audio/video, not only streaming. And there is a new protocol called RTMFP in flash 10, which is on top of UDP. For voice application, see Connect Now (www.acrobat.com) Jozsef Message: 2 Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:54:53 +0200 From: Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <tor-einar at jarnbjo.name> Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Fwd: [Vorbis-dev] Flash Vorbis player To: Ivo Emanuel

Alexander O. Yuriev wrote: > > Your message dated: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:04:39 EST > > >has anyone played with the securelevel variable in the kernel and the > > >immutable flags in the ext2 file system? > > > > Yes, and its actualy quite nice. > > > > >The sysctrl code seems to allow the setting of the flag > > >only by init (PID=1)

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > When I did try that support, it didn't give me a favourable > impression. However, that's just my opinion. It's good enough that HP is losing lots of clients because HP (among other tier-1 OEMs short of IBM) is finding that Linux their support is sub-par. Even Dell and others are just farming support out to Red Hat. >

KSR[T] Advisory #002 Date: Jul 16, 1997 ID #: lin-ldso-002 Operating System(s): Linux Affected Program: ld.so / ld-linux.so Problem Description: ld.so is the run-time linker used by dynamically linked executables(a.out). Inside the error reporting

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > To be quite honest with you - that's been and gone so quickly I can't > ever remember what my position was at that time. It actually happened over the span of 2 years before any name change. With the introduction of RHEL as a separate product, RHL was having an identity crisis. It used to be that ".2" was the

Author: marks Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: d3160869d28dca623e514dc1f38e84d9335c2a55 Log message: 6362908 nfsv4-test: RENAME does not check PERM with NFSv4/ZFS 6372549 nfsv4 server returns OK for SETATTR of size on a symlink over ZFS, INVAL is expected Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_acl.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c

hi there - is it possible to share a directory via samba and (kernel-)nfsv4 in parallel and make samba use (ie.: read, write and enforce) nfsv4 acls to implement winnt-acls? i know that using nfs3 and posix acls is working halfway okay, but couldn't find anything useful for nfsv4 and the associated acls - sorry if i missed something obvious. i played around with the nfs4acl_xattr and

From: Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> > I still remember the FIRST Linux GUI installer for a Linux distro. It > came on the Caldera Openlinux 2.2. It worked. It was really nice. Actually, the first distro with a GUI installer was Yggdrasil, circa 1993. It installed on 8MB of RAM using X and Athena/FVWM. > The Novell guys that were behind Caldera deserve plenty of respect for

Hello, we just installed the latest 13 and 16 version of asterisk and face problem on incoming calls: they are ended like in Asterisk 16 [2020-02-04 19:19:48] ERROR[3768][C-00000001]: stasis_bridges.c:199 bridge_topics_init: Bridge id initialization required [2020-02-04 19:19:48] WARNING[3768][C-00000001]: bridge.c:809 bridge_base_init: Bridge da3bd3d1-cdea-4a05-8b3d-0ded8c561c5f: Could not

Hi. I'm having trouble accessing a shared directory over NFSv4 on a CentOS 4.5 machine. My export file reads /test 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0(ro,async,insecure,nohide,no_subtree_check) Running the mount command with NFSv4 as the filesystem gives me a permission denied error. [root at pebble-anoop ~]# mount -v -t nfs4 pebble-anoop:/test/ /mnt/ mount: pinging: prog 100003 vers 4 prot tcp port

Hi, I have a relatively loaded CentOS5 server (64-bit, dual core) and a mixed bag of Fedora 6/CentOS4, 32-, and 64-bit clients. NFSv3 works without problem. References over NFSv4 hang occasionally, in particular on file opening. I wonder whether there is anybody here who can help to trace it, or can suggest a more appropriate forum? The one hang that I have been able to trace involved

Ladies and Gents, Having a rough time with nfsv4... Trying to mount via NFS v4 to get ACL support... I am getting this when i try to mount: NFS mount version 4 s not supported. here are my fstab options: nfs rw,hard,intr,exec,acl,mountvers=4 Nfs clients installed: nfs-utils-1.0.6-70.EL4 nfs-utils-lib-1.0.6-3 system-config-nfs-1.2.8-1 I presume I need to upgrade... how would I go about

Hi I am accessing files in a ZFS file system via NFSv4. I am not logged in a root. File permissions look as expected when I inspect them with ls -v and ls -V I only have owner and group ACLs...nothing for everyone. bash-3.00$ id uid=100(timt) gid=10001(ccbcadmins) bash-3.00$ groups ccbcadmins staff bash-3.00$ ls -v testacl -rwxrwx---+ 1 timt ccbcadmins 0 Jan 31 16:24 testacl

Author: marks Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 30d7e3669aa20772767cb9726d60c32659192c23 Log message: 6395977 unpack dump core when run over NFSv4 over ZFS Files: update: usr/src/cmd/compress/compress.c update: usr/src/cmd/pack/pack.c update: usr/src/cmd/unpack/unpack.c

Greetings Some time ago I briefly played with NFS. More recently with Samba. What I am wondering is if NFSv4 is already integrated into Centos 4 from upstream. Reference: http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/6331/1/ if not, is there a timeline? Centos 5 ? and... is or can NFS be a compatible yet better replacement for Samba? thanks - rh -- Robert - Abba Communications

Author: thurlow Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 1713bd2d1b7b2466298721235c1f98e4e01b0be8 Log message: 6344186 NFSv3 needs to support .zfs (like NFSv4 already does) Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/nfs/mountd/mountd.c update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/nfs/mountd/mountd.h update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/nfs/nfslog/fhtab.h update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/nfs/nfslog/nfslog_elf.c update: