similar to: Sysvol replication with Unison for more than 2 server.

Hi I use /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --log-file /var/log/sysvol-sync.log --delete-after -f"+ */" -f"- *" /var/lib/samba/sysvol root at DC2:/var/lib/samba && /usr/bin/unison &> /dev/null and works ok but not working with crontab */5 * * * * root /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --log-file /var/log/sysvol-sync.log --delete-after -f"+ */" -f"- *"

Hai, Small update since i need som testers.. im trying to setup bi-directional sysvol replication. Unison has this ability. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ This is beta, so if you have successed, please report this back. DONT TEST THIS ON YOUR PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT. Thanks ! Louis

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

Hello Min Wai Chan, ? Can you explain more about,, the DC1 will remove any emptey directory on DC1. tested it here, but that does not occure here. i can create empty directories on DC1, and these are synced to DC2. empty or not. ? ?DC1 will overwrite any users/group change on DC2? if setup correctly, your sysvol rights on DC1 and DC2 are the same.. ? i suggest you to the following. get the

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

I see the Samba guide suggests using rsync to keep sysvols in sync, but this poses a problem with ID's and it is only one-way. I have been hesitant to suggest anything because of the flak I have been getting, but I do believe I have a much better solution that transfers files via SSH, is bi-directional (no more only editing group policy on one server), and does NOT set UID/GID

Hello all, Just to ask have anyone try osync before? https://github.com/deajan/osync And would you think that this will fix our issue on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Where DC2 files or folder will be removed? Thank You.

Hello Rowland, Louis and Min, sorry for late reply, I was really busy in the past days. As Min already wrote, I have made the same experience unfortunately. With Rowland's suggested settings it didn't solve the problem. I'm on another issue at the moment and didn't find time to check the rsync/unison process on my own, but I'll promise I'll dive into it as soon as I can.

> OK, make sure that the two idmap.ldb files match and then run > 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset' on both machines and see if this cured > this problem. I did: root at dc1:~$ service sernet-samba-ad stop root at dc2:~$ service sernet-samba-ad stop root at dc2:~$ mv /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb /root/idmap.ldb.bak root at dc1:~$ scp /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb

Any plane in future to build-in Samba SysVol replication (DFS-R) ? For now we have this workaround at link: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround

Hi All, I am posting this querry second time. What i need is-- {Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie only the incremental?. Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken the backup of this file. Now I am making the changes in to this file(ss.txt) by adding 1KB of data. Now I want this 1KB data (in to a new file) when I take the

On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being used for this replication anymore. As the instructions there actually use "Osync" then the word "UNISON" should probably need to be replaced with "OSYNC". (I looked

On 2016-08-26 10:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:08:16 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication >> workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON >> when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

Has anyone tried using glusterfs to handle live sysvol replication? Cheers, Justin.

What's the current wisdom on sync of sysvol to other (samba) DC's? [I should probably search, but I don't recall seeing discussion on sysvol sync details hit the list recently.] A quick search dud turn up this wiki article - is that current best-practice? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround I'm running the Ubuntu 18.04 packaged Samba

Hai Min Wai Chan, ? I have tested it as shown in your example, and your correct. I?did a few test, but im very buzy atm. Few things i noticed. ? ? I?compaired the rights in linux and these are the same, but when i look at the rights in windows, these are different.. :-/ but wait.. Sync DC1 => DC2 , files and folder rights are ok, in windows and in linux Sync DC2 => DC1, files and

Hello, Just to share I've updated the guide to use osync. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Enjoy Regards, Min Wai On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Belle, > > That produce the similar situation. > > Thus I'm trying osync > > And the result are much present according to my test