similar to: [Announce] CTDB release 2.5.4 is ready for download

We have a three-node ctdb/samba cluster (8x Sandy Bridge cores + 64GB RAM each node) running on top of GPFS 4.1.0.8, serving 5-600 CIFS clients. We use sernet-samba-4.1.6 with ctdb 1.0.114 on Centos 6.6. Unfortunately the administrator who originally installed the ctdb/samba solution has left some time ago, and we are still learning it. Users are reporting intermittent "latency"

OK, thank you! I have another question: what the current CTDB have done for transparent failover ? achieved fully or partially? if CTDB has not achieved fully, what else we should do ? thank you! best wishes! From: Amitay Isaacs<mailto:amitay at gmail.com> Date: 2016-10-11 13:43 To: sun yekuan<mailto:sunyekuan at outlook.com> Subject: Re: Re: [Samba] a question about tdb record

Changes in CTDB 2.4 =================== User-visible changes -------------------- * A missing network interface now causes monitoring to fail and the node to become unhealthy. * Changed ctdb command's default control timeout from 3s to 10s. * debug-hung-script.sh now includes the output of "ctdb scriptstatus" to provide more information. Important bug fixes

Hi folks, We're building a new CTDB cluster - any recommendation on what version of CTDB is the most "production" at the moment? We're currently on 1.2.66 on our currently in-service clusters. Cheers, Orlando > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Samba] [Announce] CTDB 2.4 available for download > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:11:29 +1000 > From:

Dear samba maintainers, Recently I was testing samba and ctdb with the glusterfs. Everything works well but I got some problems with file locking. When I exclusively lock a file from one Windows client the second client sees that this file is in use and doesn't allow access - this is correct. But when I move public IP to the second node these locks are lost and it is possible to access the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I just set up a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes. In /var/log/log.ctdb I saw the following error many times: - ---------- ERROR: samba tcp port 445, is not responding - ---------- the command "ctdb scriptstatus" is showing: - ---------- root at fs1:~# ctdb scriptstatus 11 scripts were executed last monitor cycle 00.ctdb

Hi guys, I try to set up two identical installed up to date CentOS6 machines with Glusterfs/CTDB/Samba . I have set up Glusterfs and it works. I have set up CTDB from CentOS and it seems to work too. Samba is AD integrated and works mainly. The main problem is that file locking seem to not work between the machines at all. If two Win7 clients try to open an document from the same Samba server

I am seeing these errors every night in the logs. Should I be worried about any of them? The only thing I have noticed is slow log ons. Jonn CentOS 5.6 x86_64 Samba 3.5.8 CTDB 1.0.114 DRBD/GVFS --------------------- samba Begin ------------------------ **Unmatched Entries** auth/token_util.c:525(debug_nt_user_token) NT user token: (NULL) : 1 Time(s)

Hi there, I use Samba 4.9 since its releaseday and also had some troubles first due to the lack of informations in the wiki. Anyways... after some try & error i got it working and since i run the Cluster (non-production environment) had no errors except CTDBs monitoring of the Samba process did'nt work as i would expect it (RPC-Server was dead but CTDB did'nt complain and "ctdb

Greetings list, I was looking at the wiki "samba and clustering" and a ctdb.pdf, admittedly both are quite old (2006 or 2007) and I don't know how things change over years, but I just have two questions about LMASTER: < this is from pdf > LMASTER fixed ? LMASTER is based on record key only ? LMASTER knows where the record is stored ? new records are stored on LMASTER Q1.

Hi, we run ctdb with samba on SLES11. It was running for some month ok but after an update of the system and ctdb it fails to run. I tried to setup a new ctdb setup on two other nodes and it still fails with the same error. After startup the status is: > ctdb status > Number of nodes:2 > pnn:0 10.94.43.7 DISABLED > pnn:1 10.94.43.8 DISABLED (THIS NODE) >

hello everyone: I want to know if the lastest version of ctdb has the following mechanism: when a record in tdb was added or upadted, if there are two same record in different nodes.In other words, if ctdb need to backup a record on other node? if not, do we plan to add this mechanism? thank you ! ________________________________ sunyekuan at outlook.com

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first preview release of Samba 4.6. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.6 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= vfs_fruit option

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first preview release of Samba 4.6. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.6 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= vfs_fruit option

Hi, I have already sent this once, but since the problem persists here it is again. Please consider the attached patch for inclusion in the rsync distribution. The patch fixes the problem that 'make install-strip' tries to strip the manpages and thus fails. An other part of the patch adds DESTDIR (for package building). This is nowadays part of all automake generated Makefile's,

Hi, all. I note that incremental transfer (i.e. using the rsync algorithm) doesn't work when transferring to a remote machine. I get a speedup of 1.0. Transferring from a remote machine does achieve the speedup that the rsync algorithm yields. Even using the --no-whole-file switch doesn't help: % rsync -avP --no-whole-file file remotehost: building file list ... 1 files to consider file

Dear Listmembers I hope somebody can help me with the following rsync problem. I am trying to connect (at least list the modules) to an rsync 2.4.6 server with a 2.5.4 / 2.5.5 client. I compiled rsync 2.5.5 on an AIX 4.3.3 and on a HP UX 11.x system and I get the same behaviour on both systems. Command: rsync oradump:: (oradump is a 2.4.6 server) Error message: rsync: getaddrinfo: oradump

Hi, I've encountered a strange issue, difficult to reproduce for now. I'm searching from where it comes. Here are some facts: - all programs are compiled from sources using gcc 2.95.3/glibc2.2.x and run on a i686 LFS linux system. - rsync doesn't run above ssl. - using rsync 2.5.4 as server to backup mailboxes on another computer. rsync daemon is launched from xinetd, rsync

hi All, I followed this and installed 4.4 on ESX 2.5.4 without a hitch. Any pitfalls I shall be aware of before I try yup update? TIA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070319/aa0020f7/attachment.html>

Hello, I suspect a minor bug in the file rsync-2.5.4/backup.c line 206. To identify too-long pathnames, it makes the following test: if (strlen(backup_dir) + strlen(fname) > (MAXPATHLEN - 1)) I think that the constant subtracted off should be 2, to account both for the forward-slash and for the trailing zero in the following snprintf statement, line 211: snprintf(keep_name, sizeof