similar to: Static build failure

Commit-ID: e3e5ce11c99ce4e5638df44ed87661945a241632 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=e3e5ce11c99ce4e5638df44ed87661945a241632 Author: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> AuthorDate: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:32:16 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] histedit: fix build with musl

Commit-ID: a2020fbd897e3c3d41c75294f4e43a0e07487822 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=a2020fbd897e3c3d41c75294f4e43a0e07487822 Author: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> AuthorDate: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:32:16 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: histedit: fix build with

In the Shorewall/ CVS project: Problems Corrected: 1) There has been a low continuing level of confusion over the terms "Source NAT" (SNAT) and "Static NAT". To avoid future confusion, all instances of "Static NAT" have been replaced with "One-to-one NAT" in the documentation and configuration files. 2) The description of NEWNOTSYN in

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Problems Corrected since version 1.4.8: 1) There has been a low continuing level of confusion over the terms "Source NAT" (SNAT) and "Static NAT". To avoid future confusion, all instances of "Static NAT" have been replaced with "One-to-one NAT" in the documentation and

Shorewall 1.4.9 is now available. http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.9 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.9 Unless something urgent comes up, this will be the last release of Shorewall 1.x. Release notes are attached. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

Hi, I've submitted a patch to the Alioth tracker but thought to give a heads up here as well, I have an issue with nut not working when the clock is moved backwards. I provided a patch[1] to use clock_gettime with CLOCK_MONOTONIC to fix this, based on comments from Charles Lepple I made a few changes and it can be seen in a git branch I created at [2]. Let me know what you think. Baruch

Hi all, I'm just getting started using WINE. I set it up, and it runs the canonical Solitaire game just fine. My WINE config file is attached. I popped in a Sierra Generations Family Tree Deluxe CD and ran its setup program. A small window titled "Setup" appears with a gas gauge and the text "Generations(R) 4.2 Setup is preparing the InstallShield(R) Wizard which will

For reference: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/10 On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:09 AM, Baruch Even <baruch at ev-en.org> wrote: > Hi, > > There is one issue that I would consider as a major issue and not fixed yet. It is the use of wall time for scheduling ups polls instead of a monotonic clock source. I provided a (partial) patch in the past and I believe there was some

Well, that's the thing: I thought that was CopyToReg. I don't know what the name of the node is to load one value into a register, so I don't know how to construct such a pattern. On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:23 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you have a pattern for loading an i16 immediate into a 16-bit register? > > ~Craig > > On Sat, Nov 4,

Hmm, okay. Then what's the problem being reported here? I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do with "LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: t1: i16 = Constant<127>".BTW, the function is: ; ModuleID = 'return.c' source_filename = "return.c" target datalayout = "E-m:e-p:16:16:16-i1:16:16-i8:16:16-i16:16:16-i32:16:16-i64:16:16-S16-n16" target triple =

?Hello everybody, I'm working on the "Use difftime for time comparison" bug (#313634). Charles directed me to the other one "Use monotonic clock for monitoring" attended to by Baruch; I believe that's very good idea, however I'd use a bit more encapsulated & general approach: 1/ I'd create an opaque timer type and its get/set/cmp/inc/dec etc interface

Hi, There is one issue that I would consider as a major issue and not fixed yet. It is the use of wall time for scheduling ups polls instead of a monotonic clock source. I provided a (partial) patch in the past and I believe there was some work on it. The bug manifests itself as a stop of monitoring with no alarm when the clock is moved backwards in time. Please consider adding this to the

The kernel module loading fix included in Shorewall 2.0.2d fails to load modules when MODULE_SUFFIX is not set in shorewall.conf. There are three possible ways to avoid this problem: a) Set MODULE_SUFFIX="o gz ko o.gz ko.gz" is shorewall.conf. b) Install the ''firewall'' script from the 2.0.2 errata: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/2.0.2/firewall

Here's the IR I'm trying to compile for my backend, a 16-bit CPU: ; ModuleID = 'foo.c' source_filename = "foo.c" target datalayout = "E-m:e-p16:16:16-i1:16:16-i8:16:16-i16:16:16-i32:16:16-i64:16:16-S16-n16" target triple = "tms9900" @global_var = common global i16 0, align 2 ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind optnone define signext i16 @dothis(i16

So there's a DAG that looks like this in the debug output: Selecting: t3: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 %R5, Constant:i16<127> In the instruction selection phase, what pattern would that match? I've constructed this so far: (??? REG16:$dst, i16imm:$src) but the problem is, I can't determine what to use as ???. There is an ISD::CopyToReg enum value, but I don't

We only have a few open items that I think should be resolved before releasing 2.7.3. The list grew a bit in the past week, but we'll cover that later. Here is the list: * #93: Devices Dumps Library improvements <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/93> * #158: Powerware BCMXCP advanced features <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/158> * #185: insecure storage

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Hi all, *TL;DR:* I have a target TMS9900CodeGen but cmake is looking for LLVMTMS9900 or LLVMTMS9900CodeGen which I don't have, and cmake dies. But the MSP430 target doesn't have that either, and cmake is happy with it. What am I missing? *The premise:* I may be making a huge mistake, but I'm trying to develop an LLVM backend. I'm writing up some notes while I do so, and I hope

Dear R Experts, Is there a way in R to add an error bar (say in the y direction) for each data point? Thanks Ming Chow -- __________________________________________________________________ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help",

Dear R Experts, Is there a way in R to add an error bar (say in the y direction) for each data point? Thanks Ming Chow -- __________________________________________________________________ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help",