Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Centos 6.6 does not have a default firewall?"
2014 Sep 05
1
FW: Dell basic Server SR# 898596786 SVTG: 3CJM1P1 <<#2039741-9051508#>>
That's problem. AHCI is the standard for SATA, running modern SATA drives, especially SSD require the AHCI command structure. Running modern SATA drives in IDE (ATA) mode is not readily supported.
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc.
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
>
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant.
>
2013 May 05
1
Why?? NFS cached permissions groups etc
An hour of my life disapeared and my beautiful uptime was rebooted and it was
fixed by reading
http://serverfault.com/questions/98900/is-a-reboot-required-to-refresh-permissio
ns-after-adding-a-user-to-a-new-group
#/home is mounted from a NFS export
[jpyeron at node000 ~]$ cat /tmp/jobs/foo.txt ~jobs/test.txt ~jobs/userstest.txt
afasdasd
cat: /home/jobs/test.txt: Permission denied
Sun May 5
2010 Aug 01
2
/bin/su wont work inside a chroot?
On centos 4 (i386 chroot on an x86_64) it just prompts me for a password.
Any suggesstion on where to start looking?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443)
2014 Dec 04
0
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Ricles
>> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
2011 Jan 17
2
Procmail recipie to forward via smtp
I was in a hurry to forward email to our internal exchange server before my
vaction, the best way I found after too much googling was to use
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/mail/smtpsend-1.02.tgz and
:0
|smtpsend -to=user at pdinc.us -server=exchange
Was there a way to do this without smtpsend?
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
2014 Dec 04
0
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
systems as well.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
>> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
>> that. So you mean if
2015 Feb 17
2
Intermittent problem, likely disk IO related - mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Murphy
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:58
>
> I think the panic is the consequence of drive write failure.
> So the actual
> problem is before the panic call trace.
Most of the time it panics without any warning, but once there was:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Pyeron
> > Sent: Sunday,
2014 Dec 04
3
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
> sites with New DoDCAC
>
> I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
> DADEMS recently?
DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would
2009 Aug 02
3
Split dns issues
We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected hosts.
Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This has
always been a fine way to handle it as the zone files are for that specific
host, and there have never been subdomains before.
Now we want to just override the MX records for pdinc.us without having to merge
or manage all the records for
2011 Aug 09
1
pdbedit profile and homedir not chaning on command
Any ideas why this is not working?
[root at host67 ~]# pdbedit -u testuser -h \\\\five-68\\testuser -p
\\\\five-68\\testuser\\profile
Unix username: testuser
NT username:
Account Flags: [U ]
User SID: S-1-5-21-369316088-3201261441-1704813131-2216
Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-369316088-3201261441-1704813131-513
Full Name:
Home Directory: \\host67\testuser
2011 Feb 28
1
Dhcp 3.0.5 on 5.x
I am looking to use the update-conflict-detection false; directive in the
dhcpd.conf.
It is supported in EL6 or and dhcp >=3.1.0a1.
Since I am not going to get permission to switch to EL6 or dhcp 3.1 what are my
options?
Background:
I have a DNS/DHCPD system which its conf files are generated automagically.
Depending on which network a device is on the ip address will change. It is
always
2015 Jan 15
2
leap second and Centos
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akemi Yagi
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:05
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with
> Centos and leap
> > seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved?
> Should we be worried?
2016 Sep 22
0
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement
I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback.
How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words,
where do I discuss this?
I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment.
-Jason
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07
>
> Did you
2016 Sep 22
0
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
Jason,
Please let me know if you need any additional help with this request. I
agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote:
> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron .
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org
> >
2014 Dec 04
2
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be
certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote:
> That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL
> will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical
> systems as well.
That's really up to the program manager in which the machine would be
used. He would make a determination whether it's supportable and
maintainable, based on in-house
2010 Jan 29
2
Lockup using stock r8169 on 4.8 in gigabit mode during heavy transfer on lan
I have no output in the logs, but /etc/init.d/network restart fixes the issue.
I am rsync/scp (10GB) data from one 100MB Full duplex host to an ASUS M3A78-EM
(RTL8111B/C). It locks up around the 1.5GB Tx mark.
If I ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 100 duplex full it does not happen again.
Ideas?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
2010 Dec 09
4
5.5 x86_64 live cd
In the bang head and repeat mode here.
The live usb partition is /dev/sda1
Reboot / power on
It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2
$ umount /mnt/disc/sda2
$ mkdir /root/foo
$ mke2fs /dev/sda2
$ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo
Kernel panic
Snip from the kernel panic:
??????
list_del+0xb/0x71
cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186
ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37
....
system_call+0x7e/0x83
--
2008 Aug 12
1
Sendmail is not putting the full information in the received header anymore
Previously, when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the
received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed?
Any pointers would be grateful.
Headers received today:
Return-Path: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx220.postini.com [64.18.3.120])
by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id