similar to: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 123, Issue 38

Joshua, Regarding Outbound Registrations in realtime and a reload. Does it require a "pjsip reload" or full asterisk restart? Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > Hi, > > The asterisk wiki page says: > > "Sorcery.conf allows you to try to configure other PJSIP objects such > as transport using realtime and it currently won't stop you from doing so. > However,

Excellent. I was using ast-13.1.0 with no luck. I upgraded to 13.2.0 and have made it further, but am having a little difficulty. The outbound-publish object types seems to be working in realtime now. But the asterisk-publication object is only reading from sorcery.conf. I know you said that it *should* work, with no guarantee, which I'm fine with. I just want to make sure I don't

Good Morning, After further investigation, I found that the res_pjsip_publish_asterisk module does not use the realtime sorcery wizard, but instead only reads from the configuration files. I've been able to patch the module, using the logic from the other modules to learn how to make the sorery configuration read from the other sorcery wizards and it's now working for the

Hello, I am currently trying to set up pjsip realtime and would like to have outbound-publish, inbound-publication, and asterisk-publication sorcery object types in ODBC realtime. Is that currently supported? I know that some object types are known working and others are not. I was curious what the status of those objects are. Thanks! Matt Hoskins | NPG Corp | Systems Architect

Hi, The asterisk wiki page says: "Sorcery.conf allows you to try to configure other PJSIP objects such as transport using realtime and it currently won't stop you from doing so. However, some of these object types should not be used with realtime and this can lead to errant behavior." Which objects and is this still true in 1.13.1 ? Thanks, Antonio. PS:

Matt Hoskins wrote: > Good Morning, > > After further investigation, I found that the res_pjsip_publish_asterisk > module does not use the realtime sorcery wizard, but instead only reads > from the configuration files. I've been able to patch the module, using > the logic from the other modules to learn how to make the sorery > configuration read from the other sorcery

Hello everyone, Recently we've been focusing quite heavily on making Adhearsion[0] faster. To do that, we needed a convenient way to test our Asterisk voice apps. The obvious tool in the Open Source world is SIPp[1]. SIPp is great! Though it's a little clumsy to use sometimes, especially if you're trying to use it to drive interactive calls like an IVR. So to make our own lives

The Adhearsion team announces the release of Adhearsion version 1.0.1. Adhearsion is an open source Ruby-language framework for creating telephony applications. This update primarily addresses compatibility with newer versions of other software but also adds native support for Bundler to newly created Adhearsion applications. Here are some highlights from the changelog: Handling of new Asterisk

Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received. Return-Path: <centos-bounces at centos.org> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id p2LKkur4025229 for <jpyeron at pdinc.us>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:57 -0400 Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod8mx192.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with

I am not running ODBC storage for Voicemail. Just running Real-time time static for configurations. John =============================== ;Do you have compiled asterisk by yourself? In the Voicemail Build Option, what option have you selected? I think you need to select "ODBC Storage" and then ;configure ODBC on the system to connect to your database.;; ;;; ;Leandro

We have a mail filter ( CanIt, by Roaring Penguin, see http://www.roaringpenguin.com ) that is doing a very good job indeed of blocking spam and viruses. And I certainly get a lot from this list ... so much that without the use of CanIt, I would have already had to retire my email address, and possibly even our entire domain, to avoid the constant march of crap. But ... the list server keeps

Klang is tested with LLVM 3.1 Header file location is often changed. I guess that's why.. What version of LLVM do you use? 2012/12/30 Peng Yu <pengyu.ut at gmail.com>: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Journeyer J. Joh > <oosaprogrammer at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Peng Yu and List, >> >> I have put toy.cpp into github but it has a form of LLVM project

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Journeyer J. Joh <oosaprogrammer at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Peng Yu and List, > > I have put toy.cpp into github but it has a form of LLVM project > makefile infrastructure. So you can build it together with LLVM > Project source tree. > > git://github.com/Journeyer/klang.git > > There exist many branches and each branch is for

On 12/25/12 11:10 AM, Sean Silva wrote: > UML diagrams can be really helpful for explaining how a piece of code > works (such as the diagrams in your klang project on github). > > The main reason I don't draw them is that I haven't found convenient > tools to use which integrate well with my workflow. Doxygen produces > class diagrams, but I would really like to have

> I think that klang should be based on the latest SVN/git version of LLVM. OK. I am testing it with LLVM 3.2 wait a minute. -- Journeyer 2012/12/30 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu>: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Journeyer J. Joh > <oosaprogrammer at gmail.com> wrote: >> Klang is tested with LLVM 3.1 >> Header file location is often changed. I guess

UML diagrams can be really helpful for explaining how a piece of code works (such as the diagrams in your klang project on github). The main reason I don't draw them is that I haven't found convenient tools to use which integrate well with my workflow. Doxygen produces class diagrams, but I would really like to have something which produces sequence diagrams (such as

> I divided toy.cpp into several .cpp and .h files in several directories. > The purpose of this work is making it structured similar to clang. > And I put it up to github. > > git://github.com/Journeyer/klang.git This is a brilliant idea. This is the perfect way to get familiar with LLVM (and Clang, to some extent). > Now I wonder what license should this work follow or if it

Hi Sean Silva and people on our list, >> What tools did you use to generate the diagrams for the klang documentation? I use StarUML. ( http://staruml.sourceforge.net/en/ ) I mentioned about this earlier before on this mail-list. It's a Windows only application and free software. It is good SW. But development is stopped since long ago. The product was originally a commercial one. But

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Journeyer J. Joh <oosaprogrammer at gmail.com> wrote: > Klang is tested with LLVM 3.1 > Header file location is often changed. I guess that's why.. I think that klang should be based on the latest SVN/git version of LLVM. -- Sean Silva

[this went to me instead of the list; MM, your list maintainer] I am digging in the wrong hole I guess. Where can I find R /S routines for spatial statistics? Also has anyone made an R link to a GIS package? Anyone out there who works in this area? Thanks Richard E. Hoskins WA State Department of Health 1102 Quince Street Olympia, WA 98504-7812 richard.hoskins at doh.wa.gov tel: (360) 236 -