similar to: Samba 4 AD share: Access denied

Alright, even with that change they cannot access the share. I do not have SELinux on this system to my knowledge. The only change since my initial post was changing SAMDOM in my config to TRUEVINE as was pointed out. I then rebooted the server for good measure. People in the AD group FBC are still debied access to the FBC share and people in the AD administration group are still denied access to

About sysvolreset errors: send them to us. There is (at least) one error from sysvolcheck which is not too much important (if I have well understood it): ACL is set on FS to Local Admins when it should be Domain admins (or the contrary). That one should be a simple warning, or it is and it can be ignored (once more: according to my memory). 2016-03-29 15:14 GMT+02:00 mathias dufresne

Ok, same as im running. DC => (replicated zones) => Slave DNS << == Client pc's. Have you tried to reset the network id manualy from withing windows. ( where you change/add the computer to the network ) The button "change network-id." I have seen these things also with pc's which are wrongly syspreped. Which cases same SID's for the pc's. But

Hai, Yeah, you have probely one of these 2 problems. ( or both ) 1) This is probely because your "computer" *(user) does not have any acces. Recheck you permissions on the share and and folders for that specific policie. 2) Connections specific suffic and/or network suffic is wrong. Check if you pc is setup correct with dhcp. Ipconfig /all ( check these, and make sure you have

I dont read any france but translators work ok. ;-) pfew.. Ok any firewalling on the DC's? if so, open TCP and UDP port 88. Or try short without firewalls on, on the DC's. Other options to try is recude the MaxPacketSize in windows. Looks like a to big package which is rejected. Ow and above is also needed on the DNS port 53. Open tcp and udp. If the upd packages are to big,

Sorry for my delayed response, my job has had me out of state for a while. I wanted to add that I am not getting the Kerberos error in my event logs. It just flat out claims that it cannot read gpt.ini for some reason. This happens randomly, whether dc01 or dc02 is the logon server, and the strange part is that most PCs can work fine, but one or two randomly won't. In other words, if pc1 and

To see which DC is used by Windows client: open a MSDOS console, type "set", look for LOGONSERVER=\\<your_dc> <your_dc> is the DC used to connect on. If issue comes from one DC I would have on sysvol synchronisation between DC, ACL on all sysvol, DNS entries (but I don't think that's a DNS issue if you have only GPO issue). 2016-03-29 14:51 GMT+02:00 Sébastien Le

IPv6 is disabled on all systems where I am having the issue, so it is not a fix here. All systems have a GID, all users have a UID. It fails on startup and when running gpupdate, with or without the force parameter. That is why I am lost. DNS works correctly and I can ping the domain name and it will ping one server or the other. I have reset and checked the sysvol permissions to no avail. It

I found this one. Check which one works for you. http://www.eventid.net/display-eventid-40960-source-LSASRV-eventno-8508-phase-1.htm Im sure this is not a samba configuration problem. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens L.P.H. van Belle > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 16:18 > Aan: samba at

I hate 'me too' replies - but I have also been struggling with this for some years in my multi-DC environment. (yes, replicated sysvol via lsyncd + rsync; permissions looked identical via getfacl last time I checked). Sometimes a client machine will run gpupdate just fine; other times it will fail, seemingly randomly. My next step was going to be to run wireshark on a client machine to

For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-06-15 01:04, Min Wai Chan wrote: > I agree, > If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it > would be easy... > However, it seem

Ok, where your pc's get the DNS info from? Server : AD-DC + DNS Or Server : AD-DC + Some other server with DNS Can you give the output of dig NS your.domain.tld and tel us what what is. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sébastien Le Ray > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 16:31 > Aan: samba at

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

I agree, If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it would be easy... However, it seem that they have something else running under samba/nfs to control the permission on the files/folder... I would like to use bidir sync because I like some of the synology feature on remote sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync

I for one would like to see it merged.? Thanks! Sent?from?my?BlackBerry?10?smartphone?on?the Verizon?Wireless?4G?LTE?network. ? Original Message ? From: Jakob Schlyter Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 04:29 To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Re: Call for testing: OpenSSH 7.4 On 2016-12-14 at 01:53, Damien Miller wrote: > OpenSSH 7.4 is almost ready for release, so we would

I'm not an expert in idmap (at all in fact :p) but I thought idmap stuffs were here to replace RFC2307 UID/GID declared into AD/LDAP objects. In others words, if you configure correctly idmap into smb.conf I expect you don't need any more declaring UID/GID for machine accounts. Anyway here my machines get access to their GPO: I tested one computer's GPO this morning, the one giving

Also, if password-based auth is not allowed, WTF would you want to log passwords? This whole idea is ugly, and smacks of a teenage-level prank attempt. I would strongly object against any such modification of the main source (though I'm sure the maintainers are sane enough to never let such a crap in). Of course the original poster is free to hack his own copy in whatever way he wants.?

Whoa there :) Lol All I am pointing out is an experience. Its not so bad now as I know. I am not sure about the reference to sernet as the binaries are free and sernet support is optional. I just don't want the probs of any noob compile errors or battling with apparmor. I mention sernet purely to say there are a lot of choices, depending on distro it can be sernet, backports or native.

WTF is a jitterbuffer? Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> Date: 01/29/2015 10:41 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] JITTERBUFFER function On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:56 AM,

Complete event id of : > But still, events log show a warning about kerberos ticket from LsaSrv > source and right after a permission denied on GPT.ini And a getfacl of the problem GPO SID please, i'll check. And a output of ipconfig /all on the problem pc. And question, dedicated IP or dhcp IP? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba