similar to: making samba dns authoritative

Thank you for the excellent advice. so an lxc container should be a privilege vm. Do containers share the same file system like a BSD chroot jail? Or do they have a virtual disk image like vmware or virtual box? Sorry to be dense here. If you know of any good tutorials on making lxc containers, I'd like to read them. My thinking was that I would make an lxc container for the addc instance

I currently have a samba 3.6 pdc. I would like to migrate that to a samba 4 dc. I haven't been able to google out all the 'samba migration' hits that meet my specific use case. Sorry if there is something blindingly obvious on this topic. Is it possible to set up a samba 4 dc, and have it capture the sambe 3.6 pdc info? Currently, samba uses tdbsam. (no ldap) It runs on an Centos

I want to have samba be the back end provider for authentication to a radius server. I found https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/VPN_Single_SignOn_with_Samba_AD and wanted to see if this is 'current' and works with samba 4.1.8 -- or if anyone is using it. I want to use RADIUS authentication on a firewall and have Samba be the source for the user accounts. I am using a pfsense firewall.

Hi David Thanks you for reply, are you sure about this? Windows and Samba SMB byte range locking feature doesn't allow this by locking regions of a single file ? From: "David Bear" <dwbear75 at gmail.com> To: "Dante F. B. Colò" <dante.colo at stwbrasil.com> Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:59:56 PM

hi folks, To forward everything that does not belong to AD (subdomain ad.domain.intra) to the domain "domain.intra" I configured an entry as show below in named.conf.local zone "domain.intra" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 172.16.1.10; }; # ns1.domain.intra }; Within this network (172.16.1.0/24) I have dc1 (dc1.ad.domain.intra), dc2

Is there a list of GPO functions that are known not to work with samba 4.1 ? We have a case where some settings in a GPO will get applied, and others don't. -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

Greetings All- I have an odd need for a 'semi-authoritative' DNS server. Let's say I have a zone for 'domain.com' with public DNS servers. However, I wanted to run an internal DNS server for internal things. Public resolution of 'www.domain.com' would yield the public IPs, private resolution of 'www.domain.com' would yield the internal private IPs. Easy enough.

Someone recently mentioned building a samba addc in a linux container. I'm new to containers and would really love to learn how to do it correctly. Anyone know of how-to's or gotcha's related making samba run in an lxc containter? -- David Bear mobile: (602) 903-6476

When I setup Samba4 I already had a master and slave bind9 server so I copied the relevant dns information to my master server however I don't know how to make my existing server authoritative for the zone. It will send notifies to the slave and allow ddns updates but the slave shows this error: "slave-server named[1187]: client 1.1.1.1#22792: received notify for zone

Thanks for the info. Did you create unprivileged containers to run Samba in? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:02 PM, John Lewis <oflameo2 at gmail.com> wrote: > I have my deployment of Version 4.1.17-Debian in a Debian container. I > pretty much a standard system container with Samba installed. I run two > of them in a virtual network on a VPS as Domain controllers. Each > instance is

> > And I would just put 'forwarders { 172.16.1.10; };' in 'options' > I already have this entry, but for reverse lookup it does not work. Eg: dig suporte.domain.intra +short 172.16.1.15 dig -x 172.16.1.15 +short shows nothing On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:51:00 -0300 >

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

Will a samba 4.1.9 work fine if there are newer samba 4.x AD DC in the domain? I compiled samba 4.1.9 from source on ubuntu 14 server. Now I am wondering if I can use the debian backports repo and get whatever samba is current there --is is amba 4.1.11 ? Not sure if its worth it to compile samba for each of my addc's, or if I can be lazy and use the deb from a repo. Would love

I have been wanting to allow our routers to continue to serve dhcp thinking this would give us a safer fail environment. Now we are learning that our routers can handle creating a whitelist of mac addresses to use for dhcp leases. So we need to look at alternatives. I am wondering how many samba AD DC's also run dhcp -- and if there is a samba 'good practice' for managing dhcp. Yes, I

A "good" acl manual. http://www.vanemery.com/Linux/ACL/linux-acl.html As i do prefeer the debian os, but i do really like the archlinux wiki. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Access_Control_Lists Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Frank Kahle > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 augustus 2016 13:55

my first round of trying to compile samba 4.2 from source in an lxc container. Host OS is ubuntu 14.04 lts, and lxc template was the ubuntu template. This is a privileged container. good news, is the container seems to function well. Bad news is missing dependancies. So, in tracking down depenancies, here's what I installed in to the container apt-get install python apt-get install

Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual nics and if there may be a

I still don't understand something I know is critical for a samba 4 addc to work. We want to run DNS from our firewall/router. This seems to be the natural place for it. Furthermore, it's already there. But it seems when samba 4.x is running as an ADDC, it also wants to run/be dns. Is there a way to keep dns running on our firewall appliance and have samba refer to that? If so, what are

I have a bit of an oddity here: I'm using Samba 4.2.14 with AD, using Samba's internal DNS to serve to my domain (and forwarding others to Google Public DNS 8.8.8.8). However, it looks like client queries (and subsequent forwards) to a vendor's URL (www.pitneybowes.us) fail, but are successful if I query Google directly: [root at XXXX~]# nslookup -type=any www.pitneybowes.us >

On 09/12/2016 01:17 PM, Jeff Sadowski via samba wrote: > This thread has me thinking about good ways to use python with web pages. > Maybe php or just flat HTML for the main page and have python work with cgi > to pass information with json's using AJAX > > Any thoughts on this? cgi is probably not what you want to do I doubt you want to make things complex by mixing php and