similar to: When will Samba 4.2 release?

Dear Samba team Do we have any plan about simple "event viewer" logging in Samba 4.2.x? I think we can easily generate "raw" text logging some important events such as: user logon success, failure user logon,logoff user change password user account locked computer shutdown/startup ... When there is text logging file. I think there will be some 3rd party provides log

Dear Samba team I want to deploy Samba 4 as Read Only Domain Controller Is there any update information from this link: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4_DRS_TODO_List#Support_RODC (Because this page was last modified on 25 November 2012) Included new features and bug fixed Thanks Hieu

Hello I know there is a domain account lockout feature at: http://git.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/s4-bwdPwdCount-01 A malicious user can type in incorrect password of any domain users. Then these users will be lockout (automatically or manually) in short time. Do we have any tools (equivalent to Event Viewer on Windows Server) for monitoring these actions

Dear Samba team Do we have any update info status about 2 bugs below: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10419 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10651 Thanks

Dear Samba team In my lab: Windows XP/7/8 joined Samba4.1 AD DC OK! I don't change any password policy (all are default!) But when users logged on sucessfully, they *pressed ctrl + alt + del* in order to change their passwords (new password included over 8 characters, complexity...), but they failed I also read this link: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-September/158171.html

Hi, In domU, we can''t use xenbus to access anything outside of the domain''s home. That means we are being restricted from reading/writing to other domain''s xenstore. That is perfectly fine, and nobody complains here. But in dom0, do we have the exception? Since dom0 is trusted, I think we can be allowed to access to all other domU''s xenstore. Is that

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 23:31 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 2017-01-04 um 23:23 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > > > > > > > > I will also report that to amanda-users-ml, don't want to bark at > > > the > > > wrong tree ;-) > > > > If you could re-try with Samba 4.5 or bisect back to what change > > between Samba 4.1 and

thanks But does not show the difference between versions. hug   Citando Markus Dellermann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016, 13:39:21 CET schrieb Edson via samba: >> Difference of versions: >> >> Samba 4.5.2 >> >> Samba 4.3.12 >> >> Samba 4.4.7 >> >> Sernet >> >> hug!!! > >

Hi, I thought Samba4 was able to do everything what was doing Samba3. According to that isn't it possible for you to add a new DC into your NT4 domain which runs Samba4? As it is a DC in addition to others DC (those running Samba3) your domain should continue to work as it did for years. You would just get another DC running more recent Samba. I expect that Samba4 as filesrv is able to

I tried to run this script on a system running 4.5.15 built from source under Ubuntu 16.04, but I get the following exception: # PYTHONPATH="/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/" ./samba_CVE-2018-1057_helper --lock-pwchange Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Traceback (most recent call last):   File "./samba_CVE-2018-1057_helper",

Hi, The page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning doesn't really tell the date until samba 3 will receive security updates. It seems that it could end already in 9 months. I find it unlikely that most users will have switched by that time. The 9 month rule is fine for a switch from 3.x to 3.x+1, but the switch from 3 to 4 is special. Please consider a longer support.

Am 08.12.2016 um 17:47 schrieb lingpanda101 via samba: > On 12/8/2016 11:29 AM, Edson via samba wrote: >> thanks >> >> But does not show the difference between versions. >> >> hug >> >> >> Citando Markus Dellermann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> >>> Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016, 13:39:21 CET schrieb Edson via

Are Samba developers aware that the only way to create usable GPOs (which are arguably one of the most important features of an AD environment) is to use a Samba version (4.19.x) that is two versions behind the current one and that, according to "Samba Release Planning and Supported Release Lifetime", is scheduled for discontinuation in March 2025?

Hello All I read in www.sineapps.com have Asterisk 2.0 rewritten C# and run on windows, any body could be mail or send to me URL to download. Thanks Tin Trung Nguyen Technical Team Mobile: 084-91.365.4857 website: www.daivietcontrol.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi I'm working on Redhat 9.0,and I use Samba 3 alpha 23 as a PDC(not used ldap).I successfully create user and group for domain.I create a share on my windows 2000 workstation(using Server Manager),and I add group permission for the share.It's OK. for example:I have a user trung.h,he belongs to many domain group:domusers,layout,acc (primary group is domusers).And I create a share on my

Hello All ! i'm purchased sangoma card A-101. i connect to E1 with MF/R2 signalling. but card don't work. negotiation with E1 fail. please help me to correct it. i dont' know some parameters such as: MTU, BAUDRATE Thanks Tin Trung -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I deployed a Rails application on a Windows Server 2003 machine as follows: + I created two instances of Mongrel at ports 4001, 4002 to serve the application + I set up an Apache instance at port 8080 for balancing load for the two Mongrels => So I can access my website at URL http://mywebsite:8080/ + I want to allow users access my website without typing port 8080 in the URL.

hi, it would be extremely useful for me if someone with knowledge of how the current tools and drivers use Xenstore would be kind enough to update the Wiki with current information. I have been spending quite a lot of time trying to get my domU connected to a block device in dom0 using a home-brewed domain creation tool, and I am still at the ''Timeout connecting to device!''

Hi! It seems i already have udev... mydom0:~# apt-get install udev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done udev is already the newest version. mydom0:~# I notice when i mkfs -ext 3 my new vbd with dd, it says it''s not a block device.. i have a feeling im doing this wrong. can you suggest steps in: 1. creating a new block device 2. preparing it (mkfs) 3.

Is there a page with support status of this feature in current samba releases ? What is the current status and future? -- Best Regards, Vladimir Skubriev System Administrator CVisionLab +7.918.504.38.20 skubriev at cvisionlab.com http://cvisionlab.com