Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Samba on Chrome OS"
2020 Apr 20
2
[cfe-dev] State of NaCl in monorepo?
> On Apr 20, 2020, at 1:47 PM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> But the most recent NaCL toolchain release is based on LLVM 3.7 from 2015.
>
> Unless you're planning to upgrade the NaCL toolchain to use a new release based on LLVM devhead (which would seem a rather expensive thing to attempt now, given the plan to desupport it in a
2020 Apr 20
3
[cfe-dev] State of NaCl in monorepo?
Hi Fangrui,
As you noted we are working on helping our NaCl users transition to
WebAssembly and new web APIs that cover the functionality offered by NaCl.
In terms of actually turning down the platform features, we recently
announced a timeline at
https://blog.chromium.org/2020/01/moving-forward-from-chrome-apps.html.
In terms of LLM, I would prefer to keep the support we have in the tree
until
2020 Apr 19
3
State of NaCl in monorepo?
Hi all,
LLVM/Clang supports an OS called 'NaCl' (llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h).
It apparently hasn't had any development since 2015.
This page https://developer.chrome.com/native-client/migration
mentions that NaCl is deprecated.
Is it still used? If not, I would propose that we remove it.
I created a patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D78441 which I think can
delete 90% of the
2010 Dec 17
1
google chrome "big brother"
Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable),?BSD?(source code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD License?with proprietary parts (source code and chromium 5 beta executable, as it integrates?Adobe Flash Player?10.1[1])[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome
in my?interpretation, this means Google Chrome is fully open-source, only the flash player has proprietary
2013 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] Building a stable bitcode format for PNaCl - based on LLVM IR
> From the provided documentation I understood that in memory data
> structures of a PNaCl program are incompatible to the host program because
> ABIs are different (e.g. PNaCl pointers are always 32-bit even when running
> on x86_64 platform).
> So PNaCl program can't access any data structures of the host program
> directly. The only communication way is by using syscalls,
2013 Jun 16
1
R for Chrome OS
Hello,
I have heard that Chrome OS is Linux based, so I am wondering if there is
anyway to use R on a Google Chromebook using one of your Linux packages. If
not, do you plan on making a version of R that is compatible with
chromebooks or cloud based?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building a stable bitcode format for PNaCl - based on LLVM IR
Am 19.06.2013 18:01, schrieb JF Bastien:
>
> From the provided documentation I understood that in memory data
> structures of a PNaCl program are incompatible to the host program
> because ABIs are different (e.g. PNaCl pointers are always 32-bit
> even when running on x86_64 platform).
> So PNaCl program can't access any data structures of the host
>
2013 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Building a stable bitcode format for PNaCl - based on LLVM IR
On 18 June 2013 15:27, Dmitri Rubinstein
<dmitri.rubinstein at googlemail.com>wrote:
> Is it possible to use PNaCl infrastructure (i.e. translation and execution
> in a sandbox) without a Chrome ?
>
> I mean a something like a standalone VM like Java or Mono/C#.
>
Yes. The NaCl tool 'sel_ldr' will run a program inside a sandbox outside
of the web browser. We do a
2013 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building a stable bitcode format for PNaCl - based on LLVM IR
From the provided documentation I understood that in memory data
structures of a PNaCl program are incompatible to the host program
because ABIs are different (e.g. PNaCl pointers are always 32-bit even
when running on x86_64 platform).
So PNaCl program can't access any data structures of the host program
directly. The only communication way is by using syscalls, but the
document does not
2019 Feb 28
2
Regression with "arm64: KVM: Skip MMIO insn after emulation" on 4.4 stable
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:16:05 +0000,
Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi both,
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:36:39PM -0800, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In my testing of crosvm[1] with Linux 4.4.175, I am observing failures
> > on a 'kevin' Chromebook (RK3399) device - the guest kernel does not
> > even get to the
2019 Feb 28
2
Regression with "arm64: KVM: Skip MMIO insn after emulation" on 4.4 stable
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:16:05 +0000,
Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi both,
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:36:39PM -0800, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In my testing of crosvm[1] with Linux 4.4.175, I am observing failures
> > on a 'kevin' Chromebook (RK3399) device - the guest kernel does not
> > even get to the
2016 Apr 01
4
DAGIR
Hello all,
The rich history of binary distribution formats based on LLVM
[0][1][2][3][4] has proven LLVM's viability as a launchpad for stable
platforms. However, issues with compilation time and compiler size have
suggested that the translator must do too much, i.e. LLVM IR isn't a
low-level enough virtual machine. So we introduce DAGIR ("dagger"), a new
portable close to the
2015 Oct 20
1
Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6
On a centos-7 machine where I was having this issue, updating just
chrome from:
google-chrome-stable-45.0.2454.101-1.x86_64
to:
google-chrome-stable-46.0.2490.71-1.x86_64
seemed to resolve this problem.
I realize that the OP is reporting this issue, on C6, with the
release I just updated to. By the way, I haven't run into this
problem with the versions from their beta release channel.
2015 Sep 02
3
why I use chrome on CentOS
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:36 PM, zep <zgreenfelder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/02/2015 03:12 PM, Wes James wrote:
>> I use chrome on CentOS because I wrote a web socket web app and I can only get chrome to work properly with web sockets.
>>
>> I have a local web app created with erlang. It works like ms sccm to wake, freeze/thaw deepfreeze PCs and
2015 Oct 20
1
Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6
On 10/19/2015 04:11 PM, Richard wrote:
>
> I was seeing issues like that on centos-7 with a couple of the
> recent releases of chrome. What I found was that chrome didn't seem
> to be shutting down fully -- leaving a process and the
> ".com.google.Chrome..." lock file in /tmp. After cleaning those up
> chrome would restart without issue. The release that you're
2012 Jul 03
7
after last update google-chrome no runs anymore
Hi all. I've updated google-chrome to recent version and it gets
unbooted, when I fired google-chrome up I got messages like these:
/usr/bin/google-chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information
available (required by /usr/bin/google-chrome)
/usr/bin/google-chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information
available (required by /usr/bin/google-chrome)
/opt/google/chrome/chrome:
2015 Oct 19
4
Google Chrome Issues on CentOS 6
I've installed Google Chrome using the Richard Lloyd 'install-chrome.sh'
script (http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/), and am finding a couple of
nagging issues.
(Current install is google-chrome-stable-46.0.2490.71-1.x86_64).
First, every time I shut down Chrome and start it back up, it whines
about not having been shut down "properly."
Second, and worse, at start up,
2013 Oct 27
1
Does elrepo fix google-chrome requirement for newer glib and GTK
Has anyone tested installing the newer kernels from elrepo (or
somewhere else) in order to keep google-chrome updated beyond version
27? Actually, i assumed a newer kernel would come with a newer glibc
but i do not see a newer glibc via elrepo, just newer kernels. hmmm.
# yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=elrepo* info glibc | grep -i repo
only lists my already installed glibc packages from
2019 Jan 06
2
rsync client for Chrome OS?
Having found no mention of Google's Chrome OS in the rsync archives,
nor any useful* pointers via Google, I'm wondering if anyone here
knows of an implementation of rsync client for Chrome OS in normal
(not developer) mode, i.e. as an app or extension.
* It seems that rsync is available in "test" builds of Chrome OS, but
not in normal release builds. As far as I can tell,
2011 Apr 04
3
Is Centos 5.5 too old fro Google Chrome?
I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies
error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older
Chrome version that is compatible?
Todd
--
Ariste Software
Petaluma, CA 94952
http://www.aristesoftware.com