similar to: SMB3.0

Hi Everyone, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0). My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines (win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers). Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1

We have a project about Microsoft Hyper-V by using our storage. We want to use Samba to share our storage to Hyper-V. And we know from Microsoft homepage hyper-v(windows 2012) only support smb3.0 protocol, but right now the newest version of Samba don?t? fully support SMB3.0 protocol. I tried the version of Samba4.0.6, Samba3.6.9, but both failed to create virtual hosts using Hyper-V.

I need a client for Solaris 10 u11 that will allow me to mount encrypted shares located on a EMC VNXe3200 Thank you for your time ! Charles Corpany Charles.Corpany at ngc.com<mailto:Charles.Corpany at ngc.com> Information Systems Sector, Civil Division - VITA Program Northrop Grumman Corporation Virginia Department of Health Datacenter James Madison Bld, Upper Basement, UB20E 109

Thanks for the reply. I was checking this with several IT professionals and the consensus was that it should never be exposed over the internet (even SMB3.0) and they all recommended to use it over SSH or VPN. A couple of people said there are more security professionals venting/using/supporting SSH which is why they recommend using that. I was just wondering, would this just be the leftover

hi Michael, Sorry for taking so long to reply, I just get back on vacation. Your advice is very helpful. Our purpose is no IO interrupted with Window 7 cifs client accessing the shared folder when virtual IP taken over by another node. SMB3.0 or newer protocol do meet that demand, but Window 7 cifs client only supports SMB2.1 protocol and previous versions. So we need implement a

At the risk of having my inbox flooded with another 10,000 Emails from "Microsoft" proporting the "latest security update".. Now that smb3.0 is out and about, I'd really like to use it for authenticating windows users / PDC (With BDC in the plans) My problem is that there seems to be little to zero up to date documentation on how to integrate Samba and LDAP, the most I

I want to have SMB server to authenticate all my users. Problem is that I have 8 Win98SE workstations and 2 XP Home laptops. I know XP Home won't do domain log-ons. What are my options (I would realy hate giving M$ more money by upgrading laptops to PRO)? How can I do user based log-ins in that kind of environment? Thanks, Apollo

I've set up Samba on Mac OS X to do pass through authentication to the nt domain in AD several times now. No big deal, it usually just works. Now, however, it doesn't appear to be working. Note the relevant part of the transaction below (loglevel 4). Steps to replicate: a) Add pre-Win2K account with AD Users and computers b) sudo smbpasswd -j EXAMPLE -r WINSERVER -U

Hi all, ?Is Postfix package provided without mysql database suport? It seems yes: [root at ares ~]# postconf -m btree cidr environ hash ldap nis pcre proxy regexp static unix ???? If definitively yes ?is there some way to activate mysql suport?

> As an optimization for shallow nested functions (e.g., 3 levels or less), > it seems to me you could just avoid the stack walking entirely and add > $k-1$ arguments to each function at level $k$, i.e., at most 2 arguments > in all. This may even be an easy first implementation. I use this method with filtering unused in nested function args and local vars in my YAFL frontend

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

Hello, I'm new to LLVM but I see lots of potential on it for something that I'm working on. I have a few questions about it: 1) I know there is a MSIL backend which is still at an experimental phase. When will it be ready? The same question for the MIPS backend. 2) Is there any plan or work being done to implement a Java backend? 3) I saw the passes feature. I think this can be very

Hi * users, I want to know if STUN suport is available with Asterisk. Kindly let me know. I have posted this also in DEV list but none replied to me. thanks, Somesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050808/e26855c9/attachment.htm

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote: > On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too

In a past thread I've notice that smbmount (and mount's suport for it) will be discontinued and smbclient should be used insted. Sorry if the question is too lame but I use it in some of my systems now and I think I'll have trouble porting then to smbclient. Is smbmount been removed because it relays on kernel smb support? Samba will not need smb support in kernel in the

Hi, folks, I have a difficulty using a cifs connection... O/S: Mandrake 10.0, updated kernel, at 2.6.8.1-12mdk, running Samba 3.0.7 packages. I'm trying to mount, via CIFS a share on a Windows 2003 server. I have no control over the use of smb signing, so I need to use cifs, not smbfs (the organisation as a whole has over 25000 users, using numerous servers, almost exclusively Microsoft

Hi Duncan, thanks ! hehe . >> Why do you want the names anyway? because i 'am working on llvm to support sjlj-eh for my target. for my side, I lookup the llvm invoke instruction to build the sjlj-eh on sjlj-eh it's need store the landing pad index to stack before call __cxa_throw, but it seems no ! in llvm-backend because it only suport dwarf-eh! so i have to build

We've discovered a problem in the AVX2 gather patterns X86InstrSSE.td. According to the AVX2 manual, no two of the destination register, vector index register and mask register can be the same. The patterns in X86InstrSSE.td are missing this constraint and it's possible to generate an illegal instruction. It doesn't look like TableGen supports Constraints beyond EARLY_CLOBBER and

Hello all, This is a newbie question and it is very simple. In my local network of 10M bandwidth. I'd like to allow my PC to have a 9M bandwidth. While all the other PCs share the rest 1M bandwidth. Suppose my pc 192.168.3.2 gateway 192.168.3.1. Then, how could I set it in my gateway linux box? I think I should use tbf. Maybe, I need a cbq, but how to do it? The tc does not surport !

I am stumped here. I am a novice at using samba to do MS Active Directory stuff, but I have read everything I could find in the HOWTO collection and on the linux.samba cache of the list and am still stuck. A bit of background... I have set up a Windows 2003 server as a domain controller here and configured it to be the DNS for a ficticious domain for internal use only. The domain functional