similar to: Samba4 AC DC Ready! But "W2k8 R2" doesn't join...

After upgrading Win7 and W2K8 R2 clients to service pack 1 it is no longer possible to log in to domain(before the upgrade the clients can log in into domain). Clean installation of Win7/W2K8 R2 with integrated sp1 has the same effect. Our domain PDC is running on samba 3.3.7. I'm curious if anyone else has seen this already. Thank you Mikhail Zuskov

Hello! We have a w2k8 R2 64-bit machine in a Samba 3.4.4 controlled domain. When logging in as a domain user there is a ~30 sec delay waiting for the User Profile Service. This has nothing to do with the size of the user profile. Looking at the network traffic I can see 2 gaps, the first about 11 sek and the second about 19 sek with no packets sent except one TCP ACK (from the client) in each

Hello Samba Team, Have a W2K8 not-R2 (NT6.0) server that compiles code served from a CentOS 5.6 server running Samba 3.5.5 over an Infiniband link. Works nice but an 'imake' step that grinds through every source file several times takes ten-to-twenty times longer than when it runs locally on the Linux side. It's apparent that the entire source tree is cached in memory by Linux, but

Following the instructions here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO In that page there is a link to using Bind as your DNS server, which links to: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Backend_BIND On that page, it instructs you to populate the DNS server with the command: /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names Without the "interfaces" and the

Hello everybody, could samba (version 3 or 4) act as a "bdc" for an w2k8/r2 AD? There's one external office with a few users only, and there will be a samba-based system for file-storage - so if that system could also do the user-authentication for all users there it'd be nearly perfect ... Have a nice weekend! Torsten

Hello, I'm trying to connect my W2k8 (x64) Server farm to our new installed printserver based on debian lenny with sernet samba 3.5.4 installed. Everytime i try to connect to a printer share via point and print, it fails with error 0x000003e6. When i do the same from Windows XP or from our old w2k3 (x64) server farm everything works excellent. Does anybody know a workaround. I installed

I’m attempting to stand up a Windows 2008 R2 server as a domain controller to integrate with an existing Samba AD environment with 6x Samba AD servers (4.10.1) and multiple sites. This is the first Windows DC. I have a couple other Win2012 servers that are already domain joined, and ~ 300 Win 10 desktop/laptop hosts I’ve followed the guide on the wiki:

Can anyone point me to instruction for setting up Bind to work with Samba 4 on CentOS 7? I know there are some instruction at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Backend_BIND but they're incomplete when using the Sernet repo. In particular, it refers to 'include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf";' but that file doesn't exist at any location on my system. Is

hi, I trying to join a samba 3.5.6 (debian) on a domain W2K8 without kerberos followin the wiki page (http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_&_Active_Directory) using net ads join i've got this error Failed to join domain: failed to join domain 'MYDOMAIN.COM' over rpc: NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED conf in /etc/smb.conf workgroup = MYDOMAIN server string = %h server # allow

Hello all, I could use some advice on setting up this project. I have a small W2k8-R2 domain with a single DC. It runs great in spite of its age. However, the redundancy of the system is, of course, low. I was thinking of adding a 2nd DC. I can either get a cheap W2k8 license from amazon, or set up a samba DC. Running a "samba only" domain is not an option. Not my call.... When reading

Try: http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:aditional-dc Regards, LP On 25 Sep 2024 at 20:19 +0200, Carlos Jesus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > Hello all, > I could use some advice on setting up this project. > I have a small W2k8-R2 domain with a single DC. It runs great in spite of > its age. > However, the redundancy of the system is, of course, low.

James, I am running Windows 2008 R2 on Xen that is packaged with CentOS 5.4. I installed gplpv_Vista2008x64_0.11.0.238.msi using the falling steps: 1. Turn on testsigning 2. Reboot 3. Install gplpv_Vista2008x64_0.11.0.238.msi 4. Install process requests a reboot at the end. 5. At the end of the subsequent boot, there is a prompt for a reboot again. I

Guys, I have a up and running Samba4 as an AD DC, along side with 3 Domain Controllers, like like: 1- Master - ubuntu-ad-1.sambadom.company.com - Ubuntu Trusty + Samba 4.1.11 + Bind9 2- Slave - ubuntu-ad-2.sambadom.company.com - Ubuntu Trusty + Samba 4.1.11 + Bind9 3- Slave - ubuntu-ad-3.sambadom.company.com - Ubuntu Trusty + Samba 4.1.11 + Bind9 4- Slave - pdwad-1.sambadom.company.com -

Hi Brady, I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that everything else is working, or the file was not included in the package. regards, John On 21/08/15 10:16, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 11:18, John Gardeniers wrote:

I''m experiencing a problem with XenEnterprise migration for a Windows 2008 server VM where a large % of the time I notice a 45-50 sec delay after the VM has been migrated to the other side. I''m wondering if anyone in this list is using XenEnterprise and has tried W2k8 migrations. Thanks in advance. W2K8 online migration delays guest execution 45-50 seconds Posted: Mar

In my initial configuration using the provisioning tool I did not set "interfaces" or "bind interfaces only" in the smb.conf, so when I populated the Bind9 DLZ file I ended up with several A records for my DC which were IP address which cannot be accessed by other hosts on the network. Deven On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>

Hi All, I have a KVM machine with CentOS 6.4 (64bit), I have a Linux guest running well on this, I created a Windows 2008 R2 guest and once I start it, after sometime all the host memory get exhausted and both the guests (linux+win) killed. Host has 32 GB RAM, 8 GB is allocated to Linux guest and 8 GB to Windows. Any idea? anyone experienced similar issue?

I have a Samba 3.4.0 print server with WinXP, Win2K3, Vista, and Win2K8 clients. The print server functions fine with WinXP and Win2K3. The drivers show up properly and if you look in server properties from those clients you can see the Samba printer port, the drivers, and print forms. However under Vista and Win2K8 server I get nothing. The clients say that the drivers aren't

hello * 1. has anybody W2K8R2 Terminal Servers up and running in a samba domain ? 2. dito an license server, who is also joined into the domain ( w2k8r2 ) ? ( i have seen references to this combination working with the lic srv beeing on workgroup mode, but this is only possible if the lic srv is not joined in the domain. Worked fine with us as long as TS and Lic SRV were

Hi All! I use on my debian stable hosts here only sernet pkgs with samba 3.0.32. It works perfectly with Windows 2008 ADS. On my unstble host I have the 'standard' debian sid pkgs with samba 3.2.3. I have there a problem. It does work 45min - 1h and then I get this error with wbinfo -t: checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND