similar to: multiple DCs / rsync / sysvol / xattr acls

Hi, how can i get work Samba 4 Sernet 4.1.7 correctly with NIS. Ist provisioned with rfc2307. When i query a User withi get the following. getent passwd testswi SWI\testswi:*:10000:100:testswi:/home/SWI/testswi:/bin/false I want to change /bin/false to a other value /bin/bash I tried many things to change the value. 1. ldbedit -e vim -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb samaccountname=testswi

I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, except for 300000. Below is an example. root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ total 16 drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 scripts root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/Policies total 16 drwxrws---+ 5 MEDARTS\reachfp

I forgot about ldbsearch. Here is a dump of xid numbers. root at dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber xidNumber: 3000028 xidNumber: 3000013 xidNumber: 3000033 xidNumber: 3000003 xidNumber: 3000032 xidNumber: 3000023 xidNumber: 3000019 xidNumber: 3000010 xidNumber: 65534 xidNumber: 3000031 xidNumber: 3000022 xidNumber: 3000026 xidNumber: 3000017 xidNumber: 3000027

Wait, now I'm confused. Idmap lines do not need to be set up on the DCs? Then how does windows figure's out the ids in the Unix Attributes tab? I thought you needed both rfc2307 and idmap on the DC and the members. Em 27/10/2016 05:39, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 > Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >

OK, I noticed that also, but why does everything return NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID? Even if I run "smbclient -L \\localhost -U adminnamehere" on the DC itself, I get the error. At this point we are looking at erasing every workstation, wiping the DC, and starting from scratch. It has been a week and not even rolling back to 4.4 fixed it. What should my next steps be? I attached the server

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

Hello $list, i can't access the netlogon share on the second dc. I got this error: Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: [2020/05/04 22:13:53.035964, 0] ../../source3/smbd/uid.c:448(change_to_user_internal) Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: change_to_user_internal: chdir_current_service() failed! Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: [2020/05/04 22:13:53.037230, 0]

( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) I still think this is a bug.. why not a bug: If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. why a bug: User administrator and the domain groups are set by default by samba. and its not consistant at all which is needed for a

On 1/12/2017 11:41 AM, Richard via samba wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > thanks so much for the feedback. > > Yes, you're 100% right. I'm new at this and originally changed the default GPO, however subsequently reset the default and created a new GPO. (so this getfacl output is post creation of a new GPO) > > The getfacl output is shown here: > > # getfacl

pam doesn't work. Samba Version 4.12.0rc4 openSUSE Leap 15.2 ./configure --with-ads --systemd-install-services --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad --enable-debug --enable-selftest --with-systemd # Global parameters [global] dns forwarder = 172.16.0.1 netbios name = WNETIN realm = WNETINFO.LAN server role = active directory domain controller workgroup =

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: woensdag 17 juni 2015 10:54 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba tool and sysvol/gpo checks >error/bugged? ( but it all works ok) > >On 17/06/15 08:15, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >>

I have a brand-new install of Debian 8 without systemd and a freshly-built Samba 4 install with issues. I created this as a standalone AD DC, setup group policies, etc and then took it to the client location. Now nothing works. I keep getting "RPC server unavailable" on Windows machines and trying to list shares on the DC itself results in NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. I am lost as there are

On 30/04/15 09:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > ( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) > > I still think this is a bug.. > > why not a bug: > If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. > new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. > > why a bug: > User administrator and the domain groups

I remain baffled as to why richard.h cannot access the sysvol share. Permissions all seem ok from what I can see and I'm not sure why this should be any different from normal AD share behaviour (our other shares are working fine for domain users) I would really appreciate it if someone could let me know whether the sysvol has become corrupt in some way and I am wasting my time even trying

Hi Andrew, thanks so much for the feedback. Yes, you're 100% right. I'm new at this and originally changed the default GPO, however subsequently reset the default and created a new GPO. (so this getfacl output is post creation of a new GPO) The getfacl output is shown here: # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

Hello, samba team. I provisioned Samba 4.8 wich compiled from sources as DC with --use-rfc2307 parameters. It is fresh installation of Domain controller. All functions are working, but i can not enable (apply group policies = yes) parameter,to provide Default Domain Password policies from GPO. That I did wrong? Thank you. root at dc4samba:~# cat /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf # Global parameters

Hi All, Trying to avoid making this into a "Me too" response :) but this is the single largest issue I have with Samba at the moment, I've struggled with this for literally years, both before I switched to rfc2307 (which did help in many areas) and since switching. I am following this thread with great interest, in the hope that I can get my GPOs working, too. Currently I've

Hi I've just recreated whole environment and after DC provision ?group "domain users" has gid 100 getent passwd OFFICE\administrator:*:0:100::/home/OFFICE/administrator:/bin/bash OFFICE\guest:*:3000011:3000012::/home/OFFICE/guest:/bin/bash OFFICE\krbtgt:*:3000015:100::/home/OFFICE/krbtgt:/bin/bash OFFICE\dhcpduser:*:3000016:100::/home/OFFICE/dhcpduser:/bin/bash getent group ...

Hi James The output is as follows... wbinfo --gid-info=10013 => CT\domain admins:x:10013: wbinfo --gid-info=10014 => CT\domain users:x:10014: wbinfo --uid-info=3000000 => BUILTIN\administrators:*:3000000:3000000::/home/BUILTIN/administrators:/bin/false wbinfo --uid-info=3000008 => CT\domain admins:*:3000008:3000008::/home/CT/domain admins:/bin/false Yes I have set

On 1/12/2017 2:47 PM, Richard via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I've done the below and retried to log on as a normal user, but sadly: > > C:\> gpupdate /force still returns > > The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\ct.mydomain.com\sysvol\ct.mydomain.com\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain