similar to: sudden replication failures

Hi all, We seem to have some issues with our samba4 ad setup. I posted about this last week already but had received no replies at all so far. :-( What is our situation: two domain controllers (dc1 and dc2), one (separate) fileserver, all running sernet-4.1.7. From the workstations perspective, everything is running as it should, there appear to be no issues. However: something in my

On 10/17/2017 11:22 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Can you please be less vague on what the link is exactly? A suggestion > around the office from Garming was that we should: Oh sure! I posted that info already, I think, but this is the error: > ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object

Hi all, We would appreciate some input here. Not sure where to look... We have three AD DCs, all running samba 4.5.10, and since a few days, the samba DCs are getting stuck regularly, at ramdon times. Happens to all three of them, randomly, and currently it is happening up to a few times per day..! Must be some common cause. For the rest, the systems appear fine, enough diskspace, nothing

Hi James, Thanks for the quick reply. On 10/09/2017 08:52 PM, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > You should be able to fix the 'replPropertyMetaData' errors with; > > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes > 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' Yep, worked great! Fixed all of those replPropertyMetaData errors! :-) > The highwatermark doesn't necessarily

On 10/10/2017 3:14 AM, mj via samba wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > On 10/09/2017 08:52 PM, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > >> You should be able to fix the 'replPropertyMetaData' errors with; >> >> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes >> 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' > Yep, worked great! Fixed all of

On 10/9/2017 1:28 PM, mj via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > We would appreciate some input here. Not sure where to look... > > We have three AD DCs, all running samba 4.5.10, and since a few days, > the samba DCs are getting stuck regularly, at ramdon times. Happens to > all three of them, randomly, and currently it is happening up to a few > times per day..! Must be some

On 10/16/2017 11:13 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:17 +0200 > mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am >> trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done >> >> ldbedit -e nano -H

On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:42 +0200, mj wrote: > > On 10/17/2017 11:22 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > > Can you please be less vague on what the link is exactly? A suggestion > > around the office from Garming was that we should: > > Oh sure! I posted that info already, I think, but this is the error: > > > ERROR: no target object found for GUID

On 17/11/2020 11:54, mj via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not > propagated? to DC2/DC3, I discovered the > ?samba-tool drs uptodateness > command. > > I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" > means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? > > It's output: >

Hi, Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not propagated to DC2/DC3, I discovered the samba-tool drs uptodateness command. I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? It's output: > root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness > Unknown invocation ID

Same as MJ and You. So you have 5 DC's running. > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > >>> Unknown invocation

Hi all, We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very stable for years. Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from * CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com to * OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager version 7.3) Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started reporting

On 10/16/2017 08:56 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Are they breaking anything? Not sure. But in another thread I reported some issues on replication, highwatermark notifications, high COU load, etc. My idea was do try several things to fix this. SO I created a virtualised isolated environment, in which I can try out all kinds of things: - upgrading the DCs to 4.7 (as suggested by you) or -

Hi, We have three DC's, and one of them has been misbehaving a few times lately, stopping to replicate, showing the following error in samba-tool drs showrepl, for all DC partitions: > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com > Default-First-Site-Name\DC2 via RPC > DSA object GUID: 5e93a102-2963-496a-af16-0c51eebb2e31 > Last attempt @ Wed Nov 11 06:41:21 2015 CET

Greetings, I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. here are outputs: vm1.xml: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> <source bridge='virbr0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874 eric at anholt.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|eric at anholt.net |swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW QAContact|

Hai MJ, ( gelukkig nieuwjaar he .. ;-) ) First, why sernet 4.2.5 current is 4.2.7 Upgrade to 4.2.7 first i suggest. And : Last attempt @ Wed Nov 11 <= 11 Nov ? latest really? The "misbehaving server" check the time first. Try to run : knit Administrator samba-tool drs replicate <destinationDC> <sourceDC> --full-sync -k reboot your server, check time, check

On 12/15/18 9:54 AM, daggs wrote: > Greetings, > > I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. > here are outputs: > vm1.xml: > <interface type='bridge'> > <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> > <source bridge='virbr0'/>

Hi everybody Could someone give a tip on how can I configure asterisk to use 2 ATA's 186 to communicate each other using SIP with asterisk. I know this most be a very simple task, however this is the very first aproach I have to asterisk. I set the following config but I don't get dial-tone when I off-hook the phone from any of the two ATAs. Can some one tell what I'm missing in

I have a version of R-devel which is configured with the flags configure --with-tcl-config=/Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework/tclConfig.sh --with-tk-config=/Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework /tkConfig.sh --enable-R-shlib --with-aqua --without-x TCLTK_LIBS="-framework Tcl -framework Tk" TCLTK_CPPFLAGS="-I/Library/Framewor ks/Tcl.framework/Headers