similar to: Samba 4 / idmap / NIS / winbind

Hi, i have two DCs and they are replicate find. No errors. I use rsync to replicate the sysvol folder. If I have a Windows 7 Machine over time it both DCs are used to load the GPOs. When the Second DCs is used I get a GPO error. I found that the folders and files are not with the correct xattr acls. I user rsync with -X to sync xattr acls. I sed getfacl to compare the uids. I use sernet 4.1.9 but

Sorry if this is a duplicate: I tried to send it last night and it didn't go through. I'm trimming some text to see if it helps. I have a simple program that fails on the Microblaze: int main() { unsigned long long x, y; x = 100; y = 0x8000000000000000ULL; return !(x > y); } As you can see, the test case compares two unsigned long long values. To try to track

Hello All, I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. When I try to link this object file with microblaze GCC linker I am getting below errors and debug symbols are missing in it. mb-objdump: DWARF error: found dwarf version '15877', this reader only handles version 2, 3, 4 and 5 information

On Saturday, April 18, 2020, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:02 AM Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to >> generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. >>

Hi, General Question. Anybody should answer this. Which files are really hard links and which not? from /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ --> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ 2872186 -rw-rw---- 1 root named 7675904 Sep 8 22:04 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SWI,DC=LOCAL.ldb <-? 2872187 -rw-rw---- 1 root named 9359360 Sep 8 22:04 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SWI,DC=LOCAL.ldb <-? 2872184

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:11 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, not sure - you mention the linker produces errors, but the errors you showed looked like objdump errors? Were those errors from trying to dump the linked executable, and not errors that were produced by the linker itself? Yes, as mentioned earlier I was able to generate final executable but it

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:53:39PM +0100, Axel Glienke wrote: > Creating snapshot: > > [root at lvmtest ~]# lvcreate -L5G -s -n root_snap /dev/centos/root > Reducing COW size 5,00 GiB down to maximum usable size 2,94 GiB. > Logical volume "root_snap" created. > [root at lvmtest ~]# lvs > LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move > Log

Hi, maybe ist a general Problem. i have the following question. Wheni create manually a DNS record with RSAT Tools there is no problem. The following steps i try to get automatically updates. The following steps i have done. - Remove the Computer from AD - Remove DNS Record (checked also with ldbsearch for the principal, nothing found) - Join the Computer back to

On 15/10/2019 10:54, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/10/2019 10:29, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> hi everyone >> >> I'd like to ask, with having basic logging in config as here: >> ? ?? log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m >> ?? max log size = 5000 >> ?? log level = 1 auth:3 tdb:5 passdb:3 sam:3 winbind:0 idmap:3 >> >> log files get

Hi -- I forgot to remove an LVM snapshot after making a backup. Now neither the snapshot nor the original volume are available. How do I recover and get the original volume back online? Currently, the output of lvs looks like LV VG Attr LSize Origin Snap% Move Log Copy% ...... dom5_data VolGroup01 -wi-ao 10.00G

Hi, i have the following problem. I use the remote administration tools. I added a forward lookupzone A Record and would automtically add the suitable PTR Record. A Record was added but i miss the PTR Record. I have a foreward and reverse lookup zone. I use 4.1.6 and use now 4.1.11. Before it worked. I read at the wiki out that the sam.ldb.d and dns/sam.ldb.d are hard links. I checked that

Hello after a lvm snapshot creation and a reboot are all logical volumes are missing, only swap is present. lvcreate -L 5000M -s -n centos_h1-root_snap /dev/mapper/centos_h1-root lvs LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert centos_h1-root_snap centos_h1 swi-a-s--- 4,88g root 0,00 home

Hi All, I'm having issue with creating LVM Volume via libvirt. We are running libvirtd 1.2 with KVM. We are creating Volume Group (VG01) outside of libvirt and defining a storage pool for it. Here is the StoragePool XML for the Volume Group created outside libvirt. <pool type="logical"> <name>VG01</name> <target>

Hi, [some background] I have a dataset which describes a number of subjects doing a "scientific discovery". That is, they have to discover the rules underlying a particular domain. To do so, they have to set the levels of 5 variables which leads to a certain outcome. To identify what kind of "experiments" the subjects did, I want to combine these levels into one variable

Hi, i'm working on a microblaze port extremely similar to microblaze that only has data hazards. The advice given to look at PPC and ARM is poor because neither of them check for data dependencies and are entirely complicated and different. The port has a 5 stage pipeline where the result of instruction can only be used at stage 3 and 5 only whereas load and store instructions require 4

After some fiddling around with the tapply command, I discovered that the factors (the INDEX argument) given to tapply must be specified in fastest-cycling first order. The following code shows how I discovered my error: (R version 1.2.1) -o-o-o-o-o- x <- as.data.frame(list(data=c(-9,0,3,1,-9,1,0,-9,0,3,1,-9,1,0), subj=c(rep(1,7),rep(2,7)),

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Jan Mostert.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 715 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20020306/e36726e6/JanMostert.vcf

Hi, we have seen proper register numbers when we have generated assembly files through clang but when we generated dump files from object file then we didn't see expected register numbers. Note : all registers are replaced with R0 *Disassembly of section .text:00000000 <main>: 0: 3000ffcc addik r0, r0, -52 4: f8000000 swi r0, r0, 0 8:

Hi James, Thanks for reply. When I looked in to the generated debug dump from the object file I found that DW_AT_name is always (indirect string, offset: 0x0): clang version 8.0.1, instead of variable names. Below is a sample output of the debug dump. Compilation Unit @ offset 0x0: Length: 0x6a (32-bit) Version: 4 Abbrev Offset: 0x0 Pointer Size: 4

Greetings All, I was running libvirt-0.9.10 on CentOS 6.3 and it was working perfectly until yesterday when I decided to update to 6.4, which upgraded libvirt-0.9.10 to libvirt-0.10.2. I have a storage pool of type volume group, upon upgrading to libvirt-0.10.2, the disk image gets created as a snapshot on the volume group not as a regular volume. Now every time I create a vm using