similar to: Rsync with folder redirection from samba share

Hello , ( samba 4.6.9 - centos 6 DC1 centos DC2 ) I tried to sync sysvol as described in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Rsync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround between two DC but rsync shows some errors like this rsync: set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(apam-ad.apam.it/Policies/{D725AAC4-27E8-46AC-918D-55B560988386}/Machine/Applications/{031B2C75-D832-429B-B4C4-226BAA665E3A}.aas,

Hello, Using Samba 4.4 as a DC on Ubuntu 12.04LTS. Users 'My Documents' are redirected to a member server running Samba 4.1.17 on Debian Wheezy. I joined the ReadyNAS to the DC and set permissions using file explorer. When I ssh to the ReadyNAS, I see the following on the folder destination. *drwxrwx---+ 1 administrator domain admins 20 Apr 1 10:55 pfms1* The rsync syntax and

Hello, 1) fs acl support I use XFS I did the tests ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/File_System_Support ) and no errors [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -d test.txt # file: test.txt user.test="test" [root at dc1ucp ~]# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt # file:

Hi I use /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --log-file /var/log/sysvol-sync.log --delete-after -f"+ */" -f"- *" /var/lib/samba/sysvol root at DC2:/var/lib/samba && /usr/bin/unison &> /dev/null and works ok but not working with crontab */5 * * * * root /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --log-file /var/log/sysvol-sync.log --delete-after -f"+ */" -f"- *"

Am 21.06.2016 um 10:41 schrieb lists: > Hi Achim, > > On 21-6-2016 0:01, Achim Gottinger wrote: >> Hi MJ and Rowland, >> >> I did abit of testing last week (two debian jesie servers with sernet >> 4.2 samba packages). Seems when rsync is run against rsyncd or involved >> via xinet as it is described in the wiki the user and group mapping does >> not

Hello Andrew, i use the rsync script from the wiki.... crontabl -l */5 * * * * rsync -XAavz --delete-after --password-file=/etc/samba/rsync-sysvol.secret rsync://sysvol-replication at dc01.samba.laurenz.ws/SysVol /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Andrew Bartlett via samba Gesendet: Montag, 4. Mai 2020

Hello fellow Samba users, I have a question that is related to sysvol replication. I have for now two Samba DC's that are functioning as DNS and Active Directory roles in my network. As samba for now does not support sysvol replication, I am replicating sysvol shares via rsync with -XAavz attributes as suggested in samba wiki. The issue is that getfacl on these two servers return

Hello, Can someone please point me to documentation on encrypting a file share? Looking to have data created on a Windows workstation backed up and saved on a Samba file share across a WAN link. Currently using IPsec so I assume I'm good on the transport end? Thanks. -- -James

I am trying to replicate a samba-4.3 DC [192.168.8.65] to a newly joined samba-4.10 DC. I am using rsync as described in the samba wiki, excepting that I am using a remote shell (ssh) with the root user and password-less logins. When I run the command below from the 4.10 DC I get acl errors as shown below. rsync -XAavz --delete-after --rsh='ssh' [192.168.8.65]:/var/db/samba4/sysvol

On 8/24/2015 12:43 PM, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: > Hi > > setfacl -Rb /srv/samba/share > chown nobodycares:a group with SeDiskOperatorPriviledge /srv/samba/share > chmod g+rwx /srv/samba/share > > always did the trick for me > > Regards > > Le 24/08/2015 18:35, James a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> How do I reset default folder permissions? For

Am 2019-08-26 um 16:35 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 26/08/2019 15:20, ? Peter Rindfuss via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a question regarding permissions at the top of a share as seen >> from a Windows 10 client. >> >> We are using Samba 4.10.6-Debian (van Belle) on Debian 10 (Buster) with >> one AD controller and one file server. >>

Hi, I have a question regarding permissions at the top of a share as seen from a Windows 10 client. We are using Samba 4.10.6-Debian (van Belle) on Debian 10 (Buster) with one AD controller and one file server. The top directory of our main share on the file server has, on the Linux level, these permissions reported by getfacl: # file: ... # owner: root # group: domain\040users # flags: ---

I have an issue with W2K/XP using Folder Redirection to a Samba homes share (or any share for that matter). This is only a problem when access for a user is via an ACE (ACL) and not the traditional file system permissions. So for example (user is cath in this example): [root@gandalf users]# ll -d cath drwxrwx---+ 5 root root 4096 Apr 15 20:40 cath [root@gandalf users]# getfacl cath # file: cath

Hello, sambadmins. First some background. Server is (soon to be dist-upgraded) Debian Lenny 64-bit and samba version is 3.5.6~dfsg-3~bpo50+1. Samba as PDC, LDAP as passdb backend, pam/nss uses same ldap on Linux side, so all ID-s are "in sync". Locks settings are default. Windows XP SP3 as clients. Few weeks ago I started to see following in logs: [2011/06/08 15:17:51.766871, 2]

> > [2011/06/08 15:17:57.268946, 2] > smbd/service.c:587(create_connection_server_info) > guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access this share > (some.user) When user tries to write to network drive (map network drive in windows) or > \\server\some.user share, everything is okay. > But! > We have Desktop and My Documents redirected to network drive and

Does anyone know how to setup the smb.conf file for the my document folder redirection in windows. If I point it to a root share, with a Microsoft file server, it will automatically create a folder for each user with a my documents folder under that. How can I get that to happen with a samba share. Using Debian Etch and Samba 3.0.24 and fairly new to samba. The default smb.conf makes mention

So, what is the difference between "Using Group Policy Folder Redirection" and "Using a Group Policy Preference"? Is it an either/or and _NOT both_ scenario? Clearly the ". . . Policy Preference" is editing the registry settings of each workstation with a GPO. Something the " . . . Policy Folder Redirection" does not do. Is not "Using a Group

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

Hai Bob, Always.. Pretty buzzy at the office atm, so thats why i have not much around, but i had a look. If everything is setup correctly. Using Group Policy Folder Redirection, is also the one i use and you should use. Are you using it like this. \\hostname.internal.domain.tld\users\%USERNAME%\Desktop If i look at this. ( on the wiki ) On the Settings tab: Unselect Grant the user

Hi all, I''m not sure if the problem is with FreeBSD or ZFS or both so I cross-post (I known it''s bad). Well I''ve server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don''t count / on differents disks) zfs pool with 36 disk. The performance is very very good on the server. I''ve one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS is very good : For example