similar to: Recvfile patch issue with windows.

Hi All, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements.Following is the comparison result samba 3.6.8 + samba4.1.3. Following number is robocopy 2 flow result. 3.6.8 Read/Write (speed MB/sec) : 210/*202* 4.1 Read/Write: (speed MB/sec) : 220/*192* In case of read am getting better throughput for samba 4.1 but write always less. How can i improve the write throughput? Am not

Hi Everyone, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0). My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines (win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers). Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1

Apols to ask again, but my dns went the way of the pear and I missed a week of emails. Hopefully connection details will be part of the next patch? Stuart -----Original message----- > From:samba-request at lists.samba.org <samba-request at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday 5th June 2014 16:19 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: samba Digest, Vol 138, Issue 11 >

Any roadmap for 4.2 yet. Eagerly awaiting more samba functions :) Stuart -----Original message----- > From:samba-request at lists.samba.org <samba-request at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday 5th June 2014 16:19 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: samba Digest, Vol 138, Issue 11 > > Send samba mailing list submissions to > samba at lists.samba.org >

Hello list, I setup Iometer to test AIO for 100% random read. If "Transfer Request Size" is more than or equal to 256 kilobytes,in the beginning the transmission is good. But 3~5 seconds later,the throughput will drop to zero. Server OS: Ubuntu Server 14.04.1 LTS Samba: Version 4.1.6-Ubuntu Dialect: SMB 2.0 AIO settings : aio read size = 1 aio write size = 1 vfs objects =

Dear Samba team In my lab: Windows XP/7/8 joined Samba4.1 AD DC OK! I don't change any password policy (all are default!) But when users logged on sucessfully, they *pressed ctrl + alt + del* in order to change their passwords (new password included over 8 characters, complexity...), but they failed I also read this link: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-September/158171.html

Recently, i scanned my samba4.1 server by Nessus (a vulnerability scanner tool - http://www.tenable.com/products/nessus) Nessus says that Samba4 is vulnerable to "LDAP NULL BASE Search Access" as "The remote LDAP server may disclose sensitive information." Further it says that - The remote LDAP server supports search requests with a null, or empty, base object. This allows

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:12:24AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Not that I know of. Can you run winbindd under valgrind ? > Should help debug this. this is the only waring regardless read/write that valgrind reports: ==16475== Syscall param writev(vector[...]) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==16475== at 0xBB32337: writev (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so) ==16475== by 0xA4AC8E4:

We are seeing the SMBD process sitting at 99.9% Are there any step-by-step troubleshooting guides to track the source of the problem? -Jeremy

Hai, ? Im setting up scripted samba4 installs to make things more uniform installations. It saves time, and errors, and it will be easier to trace bugs. ? This is the first one and more are comming. ? ? How does it work and what do you need and what do you get in the end. ? What you get. Debian wheezy, with sernet samba4.1 - server setup as AD-DC? ( the first server with samba4 )

Hello, I'm facing a bug with winbind. If I request groups for particular domain user, winbind cache gets corrupted. My winbind version is 4.1.12-23.el7_1 (Centos 7.1, x86_64). 1) this is correct UID to SID mapping: wbinfo -U 100152 S-1-5-21-3451901064-902568176-4053310204-180212 2) I request groups info for a user: id -G -n 209459 [reply with 33 groups] 3) I request UID to SID mapping

On 23/03/15 12:51, Jhon P wrote: > One ADDC with linux Debian 7 and Samba4.1 working.} > Im test "NIS" and works fine after we expand the samba 4 schema. ;-) > > This is the DC with the problem of getent and can give domain users > infoonly "wbinfo -u". > > When list directories with "ls" also display UID instead Domain User > ID in the

My log files are full of crap about cups errors, despite smb4.conf explicitly stating not to load printers, and stating not to use cups in any case. Feb 27 16:32:38 arabian winbindd[1321]: [2014/02/27 16:32:38.591648, 0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3196(initialize_winbindd_cache) Feb 27 16:32:38 arabian winbindd[1321]: initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with

Hello Experts: I understand from the samba code (3.0.25) that we use sendfile during client's Read operation. Is there a reason for not using the same for write operation? Is it to do with header processing etc. Thanks for your feedback!

Hi, I bet this question was asked several times, but I'm honestly not able to find a solution. My samba4.1 (running on FreeBSD10) is part of a larger network/AD where I only have very restricted rights. Our network consists of a "toplevel" AD-Domain (top.foo.bar) and several "subdomains" (in my case: sub1.top.foo.bar), which have their own domaincontrollers (MS Windows

======================================================== "Before anything else, preparation is the key to success." Alexander Graham Bell ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series. Changes since 4.10.3: --------------------- o Jeremy Allison

======================================================== "Before anything else, preparation is the key to success." Alexander Graham Bell ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series. Changes since 4.10.3: --------------------- o Jeremy Allison

Hi all, with this version, as in 4.0.5, i have always the windbind crash after wbinfo --uid-info 3000000 or ls -la sysvol/ my system 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 x86_64 GNU/Linux I already post here some information (no problem with 4.0.4, found last stable patch with bisect), could someone help me ? thanks and regards philippe > -----Original Message----- >

On 23/03/15 13:15, Jhon P wrote: > Yes its correct. > > > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:09:26 +0000 > > From: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com > > To: samba at lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.1 gentent, ls, no display domain user > name on Primary ACDC but wbinfo -u yes > > > > On 23/03/15 12:51, Jhon P wrote: > > > One ADDC with

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba