similar to: UPS question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "UPS question"

2012 Nov 06
4
apcupsd
Anyone else around using apcupsd? I seem to be seeing a problem, and I'd like someone to check me on it: I edit /etc/apcupsd/apccontrol to replace the value of SHUTDOWN from /sbin/shutdown to /bin/false (we don't want 3 or 6 servers shutting down over a 2 second or so blip, which it really wants to do). What's happened is that a machine shut down the other day, and looking at it, I
2015 Jul 04
4
Gracefully powering off system in case of power failure
On 7/4/2015 1:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/4/2015 12:28 AM, Jatin Davey wrote: >>> >> My server supports ACPI 4.0 standard , Will that be helpful ? > > does `init 0` as a root command cause it to gracefully shut down and > power off ? thats all the ACPI support you need. [Jatin] Yes, init 0 does gracefully shutdown the server and power off. > > >
2014 Jan 06
2
Announcing a new HA KVM tutorial!
Almost exactly two years ago, I released the first tutorial for building an HA platform for KVM VMs. In that time, I have learned a lot, created some tools to simplify management and refined the design to handle corner-cases seen in the field. Today, the culmination of that learning is summed up in the "2nd Edition" of that tutorial, now called "AN!Cluster Tutorial 2".
2019 Jul 25
6
how to increase DNS reliability?
On 7/25/19 4:07 PM, Giles Coochey wrote: > > On 25/07/2019 13:51, hw wrote: >> Hi, >> >> how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are >> sending queries, be increased? >> >> Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several >> servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single >> IP
2017 Nov 17
2
semi-OT:apcupsd
John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/17/2017 7:16 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I can't seem to find apcupsd for C 6. Just went to epel's website, and >> not >> visible. Anyone have a clue? >> > > suggestion, use NUT instead, the Network UPS Tools....? works for all > sorts of UPS's, not just APC, and supports a master/slave sort of > network control
2010 Jan 27
2
Feature Request: APCUPSD Support
Hi, We use Nexenta which has recently implemented a UPS plugin using NUT code. The one problem is that it can't look at APCUPSD servers for APC information. We have a UPS per a rack and a APCUPSD server per a UPS. Without this functionality, we would have to be directly connected to the UPS's for our SAN and we can't do that. Do you have a workaround or something we can do
2017 Nov 17
7
semi-OT:apcupsd
I can't seem to find apcupsd for C 6. Just went to epel's website, and not visible. Anyone have a clue? mark
2013 Feb 08
2
apcupsd, odd behavior
As we have every day, we had a power blip overnight. one, at least, of the servers connected to a SmartUPS via cable, announced that "power exhausted, initiating shutdown" (which I've disabled). The thing is, I know the servers on that UPS draw a ridiculous amount of power, but I don't see that on the others... and this was three seconds, not minutes, after it announced there
2009 Mar 28
1
APCUPSD port 3551 permission problem
I need a little help on this problem, please? I include my /etc/apcupsd/apcupsd.conf file is attached. port 3551 udp/tcp has been added to the (running) firewall. My APC is recognized as: APC Back-UPS 450 FW:844.Kld.D USB FW:Kld This from the hardware browser. PS says: root 2419 0.0 0.0 4196 584 ? Ss Mar23 0:09 /sbin/apcupsd -f /etc/apcupsd/apcupsd.conf Is group 2419 the
2013 Dec 05
3
Plea for a more loquacious nut
On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Kris Jordan wrote: > Roger Price wrote, On 12/4/2013 12:35 PM: >> I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its components have started operation but does not automatically log their activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this under-reporting of
2016 Dec 25
2
apcupsd-3.14.14
> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R > Pierce > Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2016 7:44 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] apcupsd-3.14.14 > > On 12/24/2016 4:33 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > > Looking for a apcupsd 3.14.14 rpm. > > > > Been getting communication lost errors. I
2016 Dec 25
2
apcupsd-3.14.14
Hello, Looking for a apcupsd 3.14.14 rpm. Been getting communication lost errors. I read there was a problem with the 3.14.12 version regarding a usb connection which I'm using, but has been corrected in 3.14.14. I found a Fedora 25 Rawhide src version, but the link must be bad. Was hoping I could rebuild it for Cento 6. Looks like apcupsd no longer producing the rpms. I could build one
2013 Dec 04
5
Plea for a more loquacious nut
I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its components have started operation but does not automatically log their activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this under-reporting of important facts is too minimalist - it would be better for system administrators and for the nut
2013 Sep 11
2
New APC "SMT" UPSes support MODBUS, will there be support in NUT?
Hi All, About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf "Application Note #176 Modbus Implementation in APC Smart-UPS" The APC "announcement" appeared on their site in their user blogs by an APC employee, here:
2013 Dec 04
0
Plea for a more loquacious nut
Roger Price wrote, On 12/4/2013 12:35 PM: > I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more > complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its > components have started operation but does not automatically log their > activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this > under-reporting of important facts is too minimalist -
2017 Aug 08
5
Power Fail Protection
Some of our largest systems run Windows because it supports engineering applications that we use regularly.? These applications have unattended runs that often take between ten and fifteen hours to complete.? We have taken the recommendation of the application supplier and equipped these Windows machines with UPS protection for 30 minutes at full load. The UPSs are Ethernet connected.? A support
2014 Dec 04
2
Changing self test date
Hello, does any one know how to change the date of the self tests on APC UPSes ? I'd like to be able to choose the day and the hour so that it happens at office hours, in case of any problem... I've tried to do this by launching a test at a convenient time, but the self tests still occurs at the previous date and hour :-( Regards. -- Frantz de Germain D?partement Informatique UFR
2009 Aug 04
3
Yum - which repo did a package come from
guys, i have installed mailscanner, spamassassin, etc on my machine. This was done sometime ago. Some of these rpms i got not frm centos repos. What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this installled package come from. yum info packagename just says; repo : installed i was hoping for something like repo:rpmforge or something similiar. i have these 3 rpms
2023 Dec 15
1
Minutemen UPS Driver
My personal experience with a number of UPSes that are monitored via USB cable is that communications errors such as the ones referenced in the issue you linked to below are a result of USB hardware incompatibilities between the USB chipset and the USB port on the motherboard.*? This is NOT specific to the NUT project as it affects both apcupsd and in fact, has been reported as an issue with
2007 Apr 30
1
any ideas? automated installation of puppet into solaris 10 zone
> I''ve built a puppet solaris - package which is distributed via jumpstart > at installation time of a solaris 10 machine. > It''s postinstallation registers the puppetd into smf and starts puppetd > afterwards. Puppetd connects to puppetmasterd, gets ist certificate signed > (autosig on) and the configuration stuff. > Now the interesting part: a new solaris zone