similar to: Advice on CentOS 7, software raid 1, lvm, 3 TB

Sorry for breaking the threading, as I only get the daily digest. My comments (interspersed) begin with the **. Message: 41 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:38:02 -0400 From: SilverTip257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Advice on CentOS 7, software raid 1, lvm, 3 TB disks Message-ID:

Greetings - I am preparing to order a new desktop system for work. In general the new system will be a Dell Precision T3610 with two 3 TB drives. I plan on installing CentOS 7 as a KVM host, with virtual machines for Win 7 Pro and Linux Mint. I am looking for some advice or a good how-to on configuring software raid on the two drives, then using LVM for the host and virtual machines. I

On 02/10/14 07:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > email at missionaccomplish.com wrote: >> We been trying to boot the image in vbox using efi emulation but it >> complains about kernel not supporting handover. > If it complains about a kernel then it should be past El Torito > or GPT. The job of xorriso is to point BIOS and EFI to their > boot images. Everything else

Hello, I have the following environment - ISC dhcp + Syslinux. Any chance to get it working for EUFI clients? I need to be able boot both BIOS and UEFI clients. I know that alpha version of syslinix should have EFI support but didn't found how to get this working. Thanks.

Hi All, My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi but not the next one ldlinux.e64 Any ideas? Thanks Software> syslinux ver 6.3 atftp 7.1 Log server side >> Booting Embedded LOM 1 Port 1 : HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331i Adapter - NIC (PXE IPv4) >> Booting PXE over

> Hi All, > > My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy > mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi > but not the next one ldlinux.e64 > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > Latest updates (including firmware) for the HP ML350 Gen9 were released on 2014DEC19 (v1.21); I would suggest double-checking

I am using this command to install a w8 guest on my Archlinux host: virt-install --connect qemu:///system --name=tintinVM --ram 4096 --cpu host-model-only --os-variant=win7 --disk /dev/vg0/tintin,size=120,bus=virtio,sparse=false,format=raw --name="tintinVM" --network bridge=virbr0,model=virtio --graphics spice --cdrom /dev/cdrom The virtual machine window open and show the blue windows

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jorge Cisneros via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy > mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi > but not the next one ldlinux.e64 > > > Any ideas? My latest personally-published binaries.

The matter of EUFI?s Secure Boot vs Legacy Boot has been briefly discussed a couple of days ago. I would ask the List opinion concerning our case. A bit of the history. We?ve been in the research of malicious hypervisor threat since 2013. We finally developed publicly available HyperCatcher freeware. It runs on specially built Ubuntu 14.4. We tried CentOS 6/7 as well. The OS was compiled to

Thanks Robert, I was doing that but it was still renaming to ens*. However, I now know why, and have fixed it. For those who are interested, the problem was that when I created the base image from a kickstart I didn't pass net.ifnames=0 to virt-create, and I ended up with an image that had forgotten about eth0 completely. I have now redone the kickstart with net.ifnames=0 and all is well.

Here are some comments and questions for you. > I want to eufi boot this image: > http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz I am going to assume that by "boot this image" you don't mean something like memdisk or equivalent, but rather that you want to transfer that image using "dd" to your

I want to eufi boot this image: http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz there is a bug against it: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913523 I'd like to fix the resulting usb stick for my use, and also fix it in a way that can be used to fix the upstream bug. I'm trying to follow the guids

On 12/05/2014 01:50 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Milhollan" <mlm at pixelgate.net> > To: "Jeff Boyce" <jboyce at meridianenv.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:18 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 install software Raid on large drives error > > >> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Jeff Boyce wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:10 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > Here are some comments and questions for you. > > > > Thanks. > > I've have my scripts to a better state, including installing/using > qemu to uefi and legacy boot the usb stick for testing. > > It mostly works for me, but the "wget a tarball of

Hello, I'm not much of a pro when it comes to managing large filesystems in Linux, and I'm not sure if this is entirely on topic, but I felt that you folks would know best. I have a 3Ware 7810 card with 8 160 GB drives attached to it set up as a large RAID5. I fdisked out one large partition and simply mkfsed the drive with that ext3 filesystem, no other tweaking. I'm accessing

Hi again Timo, As agreed earlier tonight, you'll find as attachments 4 diffs (diff -u) implementing the new workaround "tb-lsub-flags". The 4 impacted files are: ./src/imap/imap-settings.h ./src/imap/imap-settings.c ./src/imap/cmd-list.c ./src/config/all-settings.c Here is the proposed description for the dovecot.conf file: # tb-lsub-flags: # Usually IMAP servers don't

Hi, I notice in the Changelog that the tb-negative-fetch workaround shouldn't be needed any longer. We have a user running Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 that is experiencing the same problem described in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263904 The current command did not succeed. the mail server responded: error in imap command uid: invalid body[..] parameter. Missing '>' in

This would be so it could auto-disable GLODA - its new 'Global Search and Indexing' scheme - for that account - assuming they accept (and implement) my bug request to be able to do that: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544100

Just a status note - my beta group is upgrading/upgraded to the new Thunderbird 2.0.0 (OS X & Win32 so far, Linux to come) and beating it up against Dovecot 1.0.0 and all is A-OK, nary a problem in sight. Obviously just an initial status report, but good mojo so far for those curious about trying it. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

Hi, I am currently searching for storage solutions to use in an environment with two CentOS servers. Both are web/MySQL servers hosting several web applications that forward HTTP requests for files to storage servers (all with 3ware cards offering RAID5 arrays) that collectively serve 10TB of images. The data grows by 2TB every year. This has been working so far but this current implementation