similar to: centos5 cifs/autofs

Hi all I've got an issue where when I call a number that just plays early media back to me. Instead of hearing the full sequence of tones I hear a short ringing then part of the sequence. What seems odd is that I can see the telephone-event/8000 being passed up the chain but when it gets to Asterisk, it is never sent back to the phone. Instead I just see the usual RTP flows. I've been

Thanks Joshua. Hopefully I'll be able to retry tomorrow. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 15:30, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Mark Farmer wrote: > > Thanks, I did enable debugging but didn't see any attempts to resolve > > hostnames. I will give it another look. > > > > I did have an empty resolver_unbound.conf

Sorry, should have included that. Asterisk 16.2.1 Mark. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 14:56, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, at 10:53 AM, Mark Farmer wrote: > > As I understand it, delays like this are almost always caused by slow > > or failing DNS lookups. Running a packet capture on all interfaces > > filtering on port 53 shows no DNS

Seems to be res_resolver_unbound.so Reading the documentation now but any hints greatly appreciated! Mark. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 15:07, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, at 11:03 AM, Mark Farmer wrote: > > Sorry, should have included that. > > > > Asterisk 16.2.1 > > And what res_resolver module is loaded and in use? Depending

Thanks, I did enable debugging but didn't see any attempts to resolve hostnames. I will give it another look. I did have an empty resolver_unbound.conf (not even a general context) - would that likely cause issues? I would expect the defaults to kick in but I have now added: [general] hosts=system I will retest/debug when ASAP. Mark. On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 15:20, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Mark Farmer wrote: > Hi. Sadly I'm still struggling with this. I've captured the debug output. > I also upgraded to 16.3.0 this morning. > > https://pastebin.com/raw/HxbX0uXt This doesn't really give enough context to be able to really say anything. The SIP traffic, "pjsip set logger on", and normal verbose information mixed in

As I understand it, delays like this are almost always caused by slow or failing DNS lookups. Running a packet capture on all interfaces filtering on port 53 shows no DNS traffic leaving the server. I have ensured that there is a DNS record for the server & that it can resolve it. I've also added records to my hosts file and checked using 'genet ahosts hostname' but still the issue

Hi everyone I’m building an Asterisk 16/PJSIP server and my dialplan uses SIPAddHeader & SIPRemoveHeader but the apps don’t appear to be installed in v16. Can anyone tell me where they went and how to get them installed please? Thanks Mark. Mark Farmer Senior UC Systems Architect Intercity Technology Limited HQ 101-114 Holloway Head, Birmingham, B1 1QP Tel: 0330 332 7933 / 07872542107 /

Hi, just wondering if anyone has any suggestions on this. I'm having a rather odd problem in that I cannot see new emails in my IMAP inbox, this is true for both Thunderbird & Squirrelmail. I know the mails are arriving & being delivered correctly as I see the logs for postfix & procmail, and I can also list them from a command prompt on the Linux mail server. The really odd thing

I'm trying to set up mounting of a Windows share for non-root users via /etc/fstab on a CentOS 4.6 box - I've followed the instructions at: <http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares> Using something like the /etc/fstab example given in the wiki page (with, of course, using a valid share, username and password for my set up): //winbox/getme /mnt/win cifs

I posted this to the CentOS list and was advised to post here so here goes ... I've looked at the CentOS docs-list as well as the Wiki as I was interested in Samba. On one CentOS box I've got 3.0.32 (the latest bug-fixed version from Samba.org) and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). The docs look almost the same and the docs refer to security = share. However

I've looked at the CentOS docs-list as well as the Wiki as I was interested in Samba. On one CentOS box I've got 3.0.32 (the latest bug-fixed version from Samba.org) and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). The docs look almost the same and the docs refer to security = share. However 3.0.32 comes with a blank smb.conf making it harder to get a secure server up and

Hi I think I hit the cifs bug described at http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1776 As CentOS Wiki said, CentOS 5.0 do have a bug fixed cifs.ko, so I thought it should be in CentOSPlus repository ... so I upgrade my kernel and using 2.6.18-8.1.10.el5.centos.plus. After I use this kernel release, I check the cifs.ko and see the following: $

Hi not sure how long this has been going on for ( sure it has not been that long ) when i get auto fs to try map a shair using CentOS release 3.4 the shairs UID is not set right Ie cat /etc/auto.misc uber_work -fstype=smbfs,username=me,password=XXX,workgroup=box,uid=500 //sys/uber when ls i get drwxrwx--- 1 root 2015 0 Mar 2 16:50 1 drwxrwxr-x 1 2001 2015

I want to combine a selection of data from two tables and display it as list. Note that this isn''t a join. i''m looking for something like this: Table 1: Sheep Name, Age, Farmer, etc. (sheep specific columns) Table 2: Cows: Name, Age, Farmer, etc. (cow specific columns) For my display I nneed something like this: Farmer Jone''s Livestock: TYPE NAME AGE Cow

It would appear that using :include on a model that has_many with an :order on another model makes it so that the order is ignored. Is this supposed to happen? Strikes me as odd behavior. For example class Farmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :cows, :order => ''position'' end class Cow < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_list :scope => :farmer end If I do

Hello guys, I have these models class Farmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :cows end class Cow < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name :cows belongs_to :farmer end ... graph = Farmer.find(x) # Retrieves four cows of x graph.cows[1].name = "Trottolina" graph.save while adding a new cow to collection works perfectly fine, ActiveRecord doesn''t

I'm having problems getting a SAMBA share on a remote (Windows XP) machine to allow me write access to files. I can copy/paste whole files OK from my CentOS 5 box, but can't do any editing of files on the Windows XP machine, which I use as a file server for most of my domestic data (historical reasons for using Windows!). I've tried re-setting permissions to allow write access to the

Using GUI methods (read: easy for most users), is there a way to map to a Samba share and have it accessible to all applications? Going through Nautilus I'm able to create a link to the shares, but they're not accessible from many applications. And, obviously, this is going to be something that changes per user (different mappings, different credentials, etc), so I can't use a static

Hi, I have CentOS 5 with the XFCE-4.4 window manager installed. (BTW, I've tried many XFCE-centered distros before, and CentOS offers by far the cleanest implementation). Two questions for that. 1) I've seen various HOWTO's about how to display Samba shares with the Thunar file manager. Did anyone manage to do this with CentOS? 2) Is there some HOWTO about configuring that nice