similar to: Can't verify gpg signature for the file with hashes for the CentOS 7

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> >> Hello Jeremy, >> >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client >> > and server ? >> Yes, the uids and gids are identical on both server and client machines. > Then it should work. Set debug level 10 on the smbd > and look

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 3:48:51 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello, >> After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

On Dec 19, 2014 9:05 PM, "Rufe Glick" <rufe.glick at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Jeremy, > > Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > >> Hello Jeremy, > > >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > > >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at

Hi list, I downloaded the CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-2003.iso ( sha256sum 659691c28a0e672558b003d223f83938f254b39875ee7559d1a4a14c79173193 ) and mount it on /mnt Unfortunately, It returned "BAD signature" when I verified the repodata/repomd.xml.asc So should I continue to use this ISO? Below is my procedure: # gpg --import /mnt/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-7 gpg: key F4A80EB5: public key

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello Jeremy, > > Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > >> Hello Jeremy, > > >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client > >> > and server ? > > >> Yes, the uids and gids are

On 2016-04-28 21:08, Andreas Benzler wrote: > repository gpg can be found in > /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ > > read the repo file(s) in > > /etc/yum.repos.d/ > > cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo > # CentOS-Base.repo > # > # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the > # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to

Greetings - I don't think this is a bug; just something I don't understand. I'm using RedHat Linux v7.0 with an i686 processor. I've been using openssl v0.9.5a with openssh v2.2.1 I've upgraded to openssl v0.9.6b and openssh v2.9.p2 I've built both packages with the '--prefix=/usr' option. During the openssh 'make install' at 'host-key' I get

First off, I have to admit that I'm uncertain if this is the appropriate forum; I'd be happy for suggestions about where else to look. I'm doing this work on a stock install of CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1810.iso, with no updates. I'm trying to create an RPM database from a custom set of RPMs. One RPM ('openldap-ltb' from the LDAP Tool Box project (ltb-project.org) has a

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello, > > After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something

In the v7.0 SDK I see _WIN32_WINNT defined in several places: winresrc.h0x0500 if not defined already (Windows 2000) sdkddkver.h0x0601 if not defined already (Windows 7) objbase.hSet based on NTDDI_VERSION, if not defined already objidl.hSimiler to objbase.h sdkddkver.h is included by windows.h in the v7.0 SDK. With SP1 VC2005, it's defined as 0x0500 in only one place (winresrc.h). So it

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Don Williamson <don.williamson at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Francois, > > I have all licensed versions of VS at my disposal (the benefits of being a former MS employee) but I'm currently using VS2005 due to specific technical reasons that I can't disclose. > > The "Getting Started" page states support of 2005 SP1 which, if

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9744 Summary: Support Git, Mercurial, Subversion ignore lists Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: jglick at apache.org

<div><br><div><br><br><br><br><br><font color="#990099"><br></font><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;"><div><div><br> <asterisk-users-request

Cisco has version 7.1 of their SIP firmware for the 79x0 phones. They advertise "no new software features", but it does include bugfixes for a number of things. I know there was a discussion about the 0.4sec delay, which is said to be resolved in this firmware (CSCed48311: Media takes 0.4 sec to be set up) Steve

Hi, Does anyone have experience with BackupExec and Samba? BackupExec refuse to access Samba shares. Windows shares are OK, but all my Samba shares are not. I have Samba on at least 2 Linux 2.4 machines + 1 on Solaris. Neither ones work with BExec. Any idea? Other have experience with BExec and Samba? Thanks a lot -jec _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Jean-Eric Cuendet

Am 2017-09-19 09:36, schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: > Hi, > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or > Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS

I've followed all the LLVM+clang build-from-source instructions for Windows using MSVC++ 2008. It all builds fine. I initially had troubling getting any linking to work at all until I made sure to have the right environment variables set using a wrapper batch script. Now C programs compile, link, and execute fine, but C++ programs don't link, not even a simple "hello, world"

Hi. It looks like the gpg signatures of the RC2 and RC3 tarballs are bogus... I've tested the .bz2 and .tar.gz files downloaded from the us1 and us4 mirrors. To confirm that it's not a local problem, I've tested the signature of the Samba_CA.crt file (http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/) and it's ok. Can someone else please confirm it? Thanks. - Ademar $ gpg --verify