similar to: markdown and textile

so much for the markdown listserve grapevine... it ends up that there has been a markdown-savvy display-in-real-time app for a couple months now, by the name of "macchiato", coded by a college kid. > http://getmacchiato.com > http://kswizz.com/post/8624456381/macchiato > http://mac.onedayoneapp.com/macchiato/ > http://shawnblanc.net/2011/08/macchiato/ >

brett terpstra continues his obsession with markdown... > http://fuckyeahmarkdown.com/ there's also a g-rated version: > http://heckyesmarkdown.com/ brett has accomplished more in the last three months than this listserve accomplished in the last three years. and it looks like he's only just getting started... meanwhile, fletcher is about to send off his rocket, which

While I empathize with your predicament, I generally prefer not to have expletives in my inbox. Also, what has this to do with markdown? On Jul 5, 2013 7:20 PM, "bowerbird" <bowerbird at aol.com> wrote: > fan_fucking_tastic. > > somebody hit another one of the dead skunks on this road. > > -bowerbird > > _______________________________________________ >

i'll be doing some experiments myself, but i thought i'd ask here first about back-translation and round-tripping with markdown and its xhtml output. the object is to take markdown output, reduce it back to a markdown text-file, then regenerate the output again and compare it with the "original" output, repeating if necessary until there exists a pair of files that give perfect

i should probably just let this listserve die, but... *** anyway, it's that brett terpstra fellow again... > http://brettterpstra.com/my-ultimate-markdown-editor-wishlist/ -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20120508/8915e1cf/attachment.htm>

i am considering writing converters between my "zen markup language' and "markdown", but i don't know which version of markdown to target. i'd think it'd be the "pandoc" version, and i understand that to be closest to "multimarkdown", but gruber has said he "disagrees" with "almost every part" of multimarkdown's syntax

Along with the new release of PHP Markdown 1.0.2b7 comes this new version of PHP Markdown Extra. It contains every improvements of PHP Markdown 1.0.2b7 plus some new fixes and two new features. You can download it here: <http://www.michelf.com/docs/projets/php-markdown-extra-1.1b1.zip> and you can test it on the PHP Markdown Dingus (select PHP Markdown Extra):

where are the worthwhile markdown dingi? (dinguses?) i'm interested in any dingus that can take a "reasonable" amount of text -- let's say anything up to a megabyte -- and return the results in real-time, without a long wait... ideally it'd handle something more than gruber-minimum, and an a.p.i. (that'd take a u.r.i. as input) would be dandy... bonus points for

like history, the future is decided by the people who write it... > http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/10/the-future-of-markdown.html by the way, if you want a form of light-markup which is still flexible enough to be molded, but will be _totally_ free of ambiguities and "edge-cases", and governed by a well-written specification and thorough documentation, along with an

alan said: > I think I am in agreement, > if by "isn't necessary" you mean to say that > simply providing more features to Markdown > doesn't force end users to use them, > or even really know they exist. except that wasn't what i meant. i mean that it's not necessary to trade simplicity in order to get the power of additional

ok, how do we get markdown put into the browsers?, so people can start serving documents in plain-text, spared from the drudgery of converting to .html first. -bowerbird ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

babelmark sure does make it easy to convince people that markdown inconsistencies are a mess of trouble. before, people ignored the problem and/or its scope. and waylan's new list just shows how big that mess is. especially if we acknowledge all the other uses extant. plus gruber's latest manifestation of his longstanding reluctance to "fuck with it" means markdown is stuck.

fletcher said: > For any consensus to come about, > I think we need to agree on the > fundamental purpose and philosophy of > the consensus we claim to be interested in. it would be nice. > Otherwise many of these discussions will > continue to occur without much hope of > moving forward to any actual outcome/resolution. yep. > it's

i am waiting to hear about "the future of markdown" according to john gruber, because as far as i can see, he's the only person who can determine that future... sadly, however, i think i _did_ hear about it from him, in that "i'm not gonna fuck with it" post from last week. i know i'm certainly not _expecting_ any more from him. he's met his

I am glad to see support for footnotes working its way into other implementations of Markdown! However, I have a couple of issues. Issue # 1. There appears to be a bug in the footnote parser that causes material following the footnote to be included as part of the footnote. For example: < Example Section > ## Metadata ## First, take a look at the overall structure of the document.

emmanuel said: > Thanks again for the detailed comments. well, sir, you deserve them. and i must say that your responses are uniformly impressive, both individually and -- most especially -- in their aggregate. the only one of them that would still wrinkle my forehead is the thought of possibly limiting the program only to chrome. i believe that might be a decisive turn-off to too many

from : benoit at transmekong.com to : markdown-discuss at six.pairlist.net Subj.: Use of Markdown Extra in a forum Date : Apr 19th 2007, 15:24:25 (GMT+7) Dear all, I have tried to implement PHP Markdown Extra in a forum (PunBB) and found that however well each message is translated, there are collisions when different messages in the same page have the same inside link names (footnotes, title

sherwood said: > If agreement is reached, then the group > looks at variants 6,7,8,9 and inquires > if they would like to join in this effort. well, that kind of leveraged consensus would have been the way to go about this process a year ago. but not today. > Has anyone collected a would-be canonical list > of either the ambiguous cases in original MD, >

this is fascinating: > http://daringfireball.net/linked/2011/08/05/markdown-uti i don't know (and don't care about) any possible significance of such a pronouncement on a "uniform type indicator", but i think that it's interesting that gruber has decided to make _any_ type of statement on markdown, with the big moves now underfoot, and doubly so when he chooses to

godspeed, steve. thanks for giving us the tools to catch fish. -bowerbird -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111006/3e1c11bd/attachment.htm>