similar to: OT: Question on Caller ID (Spoofing calls with Asterisk)

Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running asterisk? Then it's time to move them to Canada or similar. http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-about-t o-be-outlawed.html Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd dean at cognation.net <mailto:dean at cognation.net> +1-212-203-4357 Ph +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).

Hello everybody! I am having the following problem and since I am a beginner in playing with asterisk, i can't solve it: I am trying to integrate my existing H.323 network in real world telephony by ISDN cards. The problem is that i DON'T want to change all e164 numbers in my h.323 network and my ISDN provider doesn't accept those identities (CIDs). So, i have to spoof the outgoing

We have antiquated caller ID schemes here in Australia. We barely support numbers from other local carriers, let alone OS ones. Certainly no names either.

Is there anyway to "spoof" a BLF signal to a phone from within a dialplan? That being so I can turn a BLF light on or off on a phone when a certain thing happens in a dialplan?

I am currently suffering various SIP attacks. I am using the following extension to record the caller's IP address: exten => h,n,set(CDR(srcip)=${CHANNEL(recvip)}) However, in recent attacks, this IP address is not correct, and I believe that they are spoofing it. I am using asterisk 1.6.2.15. Does the CHANNEL(recvip) variable record IP show in the SIP header instead of the real, UDP

My firewall is using shorewall 3.0.x and CentOS Recently, I found that firewall is attaching from ARP spoofing.. There are a lot of "out of socket memory" in messages log ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and

Hi there. I have configured kvm domain (rhel6.4) with ethernet bridged over macvtap, and found no filtration applied except mac. 'virsh' just silently ignoring attributes 'filterref' and 'ip address' in different formats. No error on validate stage. Config examples: ... <interface type='direct'> <mac address='52:54:00:31:ae:1a'/>

On a BT line, how do I determine whether the number on an incoming call has been deliberately withheld (by dialling 141) or is merely unavailable (e.g. because it originated from overseas or passed through some ancient switching equipment) ? In the first case, I want the caller to be played a message to the effect that we are not at home to anonymous cowards but if their business is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Is there a way to prevent hwaddr/mac address spoofing between DomU''s? So in a way ''binding'' a mac-address on boot time with a virtual interface? (with something like ebtables/arptables/etc?) Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Hi, I have the following Problem: My Rootserver stands at a hoster, I run a debian sarge and installed Xen 3 there latetly. I booted the xen Kernel - everything ok. However: when I started xend, the server instantly stopped responding. My Hosters Support said, that was due to a sort of mac spoofing protection in the switch, which disabled the Port, to which my server is connected, because there

I'm thinking of doing an app to work with the CID that's gotten from the Zap channel. All the CID's I see from within the US are 10 digit numbers. I'm out in the rural areas of the US, and no-one ever calls me from overseas. If they did, what would the CID look like? What does the CallerID look like overseas? How many countries provide it? murf

So, I agree, the curent wireless card I have been given does not allow source address spoofing, but I still would like to use bridging. I wonder if anyone has tried modifying the bridge code to encapsulate the actual packet in some way so that the desired source address can be preserved? I am thinking of something like duplicating the ETH header, adding it to the beginning of the packet, so that

Hi, I'm resending since I got no feedback: I assume that the message was lost... The attached patch fixes a few bugs related to the spoofing portmapper used by nfsmount. Regards, Louis -- Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes -------------- next part

I have an outgoing line that allows me to set my caller id. I want to be able to change the caller id when ever I place a call using this line. I would like my user to press 7, then be prompted for their 10 digit caller id number, then be prompted for the number they would like to call in the form 1NXXNXXXXXX. How can I accomplish this??? Right now I am using this script that users have to

Hi guys Though being a mere user, - as opposed to an expert - in many long years of ssh in my use this, is new: -> $ ssh box5.proxmox.mine hostname -i 10.3.1.78 -> $ ssh box5 hostname -i Warning: the RSA host key for 'box5' differs from the key for the IP address '10.3.1.78' Offending key for IP in /root/.ssh/known_hosts:2 Matching host key in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts:2

So I'm not getting caller ID via the X100P card. I've confirmed the PSTN is sending me caller id by plugging in a little third party box. Ideas, tips, greatly appreciated

A little bird whispers to me: Don't expect this particular trick to be un-addressed by various legislatures forever. That window is closing, and the bottom of the window looks very much like a guillotine blade - don't have your head in the wrong place. In any case, as has been discussed on -users before (which is where this thread should go, and thus where I'm relegating it)

Reposted to this list: (http://lists.virus.org/voipsec-0610/msg00046.html) > That's exactly the type of thing that needs to be stopped. If Dell outsourcing calls me from India, the CLI must be their number in India not a faked-in number of some office in the US. That to me is exactly the purpose of this proposed law. It is equivalent to the law regarding FAX calls that has been

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:44:12 -0400, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael <venefax at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call

Hi List! any body use www.simpletelecom.com? I subscribe to www.simpletelecom.com for A-Z termination and paid US$15.00 and US$70.00 via credit card in two days, but my account has US$15.00 only. I checked my credit card from the bank and they said me the payment already paid to merchant. I've lost US$70.00 :( so anyone here has experience with them? are they a SCAM? Thanks! </Madhawa>